Interview, in groups of three, one of your
classmates and prepare to report
the following information to the rest of the class:

Course Introduction



“Modern European Drama” :"

- What is the tragedy of the modern family? How are family members expected to “perform”? And can the theater even begin to portray the comedy and tragedy (or tragicomedy) that is modern life?

- So-called Anti-Aristotelian dramas, or the plays written and produced between ca. 1870 and 1930, address these and many other questions. This course covers Naturalist Drama to the roots of the Theater of the Absurd.

- We will read and consider the performance histories of Scandinavian, Irish, French, and Italian theater: Ibsen, Strindberg, Ernst Rosmer (Elsa Bernstein), Wilde, Wedekind, and  Pirandello. Students will leave with a profound appreciation for the development of modern Europe and its playhouses. Satisfies 1b (pre-1900); Drama; multinational; gender


- Students will leave with a profound appreciation for the turbulent world of the modern playhouse.

Unit I: Drama before 1900 and the Naturalists


1.    Henrik Ibsen, Doll's House (Signet )
2.    Henrik Ibsen, Hedda Gabler
3.    A. Strindberg, The Father
4. A. Strindberg, Miss Julie
5. Elsa Bernstein, Twilight
6. Wilde, Importance of Being Earnest

Unit II: Twentieth-Century Families and Performances

Brecht and Artaud (pdf/online)

7. Wedekind, Spring Awakening  
8. L. Pirandello, Six Characters in Search of an Author

Course Objectives


(pre-1900, Drama, multinational, gender, 300-level course)

-    Historical/Literary Epochs: Sophisticated Command of “Modern European Drama” ca. 1870-1950 (Naturalist Drama & Theater of the Absurd)

-    Genre: Ability to distinguish between Drama as Text and Performance

-    Comparative Prowess: Contrasts and Similarities between Scandinavian, French, Irish, English, German and Italian Plays

-    Appreciation for Gender Issues in Modern Drama and Culture

-    Scholastic Growth and Maturity (from Consumer to Producer of Knowledge)

Course Requirements:



What do you like about modern family life? What do you think could change about modern family life? In what ways is your favorite movie or play about family life, and what comment does it make on (modern) family life?

Pros

- gender roles more flexible
- family unit is more unified
- family is more public (and so people can compare)
- equality in finances
- easier to keep in touch with family members through technology

Cons

- families break up easily
- coddled children w/no independence (need for more balance)
- fears about children passed on through technology
- technology distracts family members > "I" more important
- extended families not together very often
- generational divide

Anti-Aristotelian drama
- time not unified
- character / action
- open-ended
- spectacle
- characters atypical


What qualities do you think good mothers have? bad mothers?
+
being able to sacrifice for the family
spending time with children
being loving and caring
putting children's needs first
creating an environment in which children can learn (to be independent)
patience

-
fail to discipline kids
neglectful
selfish
passive to needs of the child
overbearing
irresponsible

How important was love, and what role did love play in this type of a family?

Nora / Torvald Helmer
Kristine Linde / Nils Krogstad
Dr. Rank / Nora Helmer

kitchen, church, children = mother/wife

What's going on outside the world of the stage that we don't see?
- bank
- upstairs neighbors
- Rank's apt.
- Torvald's study
- mailbox
- bedroom
- nursery

Review
1. Why is the play called Hedda Gabler and not Hedda Tesman?

> Yvonne, Jonathan, Renea, Krisy


2. Why does Hedda marry Tesman?


> Yvonne, Jonathan, Christina, Krisy


3. Why is Hedda so cruel to Aunt Julia and Thea Elvsted? What aspects of femininity might they represent?


> Yvonne, Kristen P., Melissa (first part)


4. Similarities to Doll House?


> Sarah, Renea


5. Hedda's unhappiness


> Christina H., Renea, Megan, Melissa


6. Role of Scenery


> Kareem, Krisy


7. Hedda and Nora as New Women

>> more work needs to be done on this ques.

8. Hedda's Suicide

Krisy + Kristen P.

9. Death in Hedda Gabler

Christina H. + Kristin P.



Why is Laura set against the Captain's plans for their daughter?

















In what ways is Miss Julie a New Woman?


In what ways is Miss Julie a "naturalistic" drama (as described by Strindberg p. 58-9, 64, 66)?

- environmental influence
- no breaks in time > no breaks for acts
- current day
- real props
- complicated characters





What does it mean that Hedda, the Captain, and Miss Julie die at the end of the dramas? Does it make them heroic, or not so much?

- epic ending?
- tragic ending?

- poisoned environment

- Hedda : strong

- Captain + MJ : weak willed?  



Questions on Twilight:

A. Comprehension


B. Interpretation
  1. Krisy, Christopher, + Paula: What is the significance of Isolde’s blindness? Bernstein specifically choose to make her blind. How does this connect to Isolde’s transformation?
  2. Yvonne: Do you think Isolde and Sabine are both "New Women?"  Provide some character traits that support your view. 
  3. Kristin S.: Why do you think Ritter decided to choose Isolde instead of Sabine?
  4. Kareem: Why do you think Isolde has such a fear of letting Ritter know the full extent of her failing eyesight. She says, "I can't tell him. I'd rather be killed... It'll break him, really, it'll break him---" (Bernstein 76). Does this show love, or rather fear?
  5. Kristin S., Maureen + Melissa: Do you think Carl's love for Isolde was out of pity or do you think he really meant it?
  6. Kristin S.: What kind of man or father do you think Ritter is? + Krisy: What is expected of Ritter as Isolde's father? Why does he feel that he has failed her?

Other New-Woman Plays:


What qualities do you associate w/traditional fatherhood?


In what ways is Earnest similar to the Naturalist dramas we've been reading?

parentage

Why is Lady Bracknell played by a man? How does it change the performance?



How many different tragedies occur in the play?

Free write (5-10 min.): Why do you think Pirandello constructs his play in such an abstract manner? Consider how you might, as an audience member, react to the family's "painful drama" if it were dramatized in the Naturalist style.


Writing Drama Exercise


1. Father (Torvald Helmer, the Captain, the Count, Ritter)
2. Mother (Nora, Hedda, Laura)
3. Daughter (Bertha, Miss Julie, Isolde)
4. Nurse
5. Pastor
6. Doctor (Rank, Sabine Graef)
7. Visiting/returned friend male (Eilert Lovborg, Carl)
8. Visiting/returned friend female (Mrs. Linde, Thea Elvsted)

A. Come together as a Cast

Find enough classmates to constitute a kind of cast, and then decide who wants to read, and who wants to write. Everyone should generate ideas, but it's more efficient if each group has 1 or 2 scribes to write out the dialogue for 3-5 readers, which may include someone to read the action. Those without roles should write out the dialogue. Kill off one of the characters at the beginning (is the mother alive? the father?), freeing at least one student to write the dialogue; eliminate more characters as needed for the plot.

B. Come together as Screen Writers

Write one brief scene (not nec. the beginning) that you'll prepare to share with the class. Perhaps the plot involves introducing the  the visiting friend to the audience.  Your setting can be a 21st-c. living room, but consider including a tragic social issue that we have discussed such as.

7pm Curtain Time








What did you find helpful about the close analyses?

Which was your best one and why?

Did you have any favorites of your classmates'?


Writing Pitfalls

- You/we is not okay b/c it's not academic writing

- Eliminate all to be verbs (passive + colloquial)
- Don't use semicolons (;) = period

- Nineteenth-century women includes a dash, but the nineteenth century, a noun, does not.