Position Paper Portfolio
After
reading the assigned material, you need to arrive to seminars with
a position on material in mind. In French called a précis, in German a Referat, the position paper
is an academic tradition whereby seminar participants share their
thoughts in writing (ca. 1-2 pages/250-400 words not incl. the
Works Cited).
Another
way to think about a position paper is as a provocation: it should
provoke readers to new ways about thinking about a complex issue.
Very good, great, or excellent
position papers might point towards the reader’s
critique-in-process, or a mature critical perspective on both
primary and critical text, opening the way for the seminar to
discuss and debate themes that may call other scholars'
perspectives into question. Fine or good
position papers might begin to closely
analyze details of a passage in the primary text while
acknowledging points of the scholarly debate surrounding the
primary text; it's probably a bit too general. Okay or fine position papers might
summarize the some critical points of a scholarly debate and
connect these to the reader’s personal thoughts on the primary
text, without taking an independent position in a scholarly
debate; such papers are too general. Poor position papers are
likely not long enough.
You should use position papers as opportunities to hone your own
critical perspective, as well as your academic writing persona.
The ability to say something intelligent about texts in a short
amount of time is a skill that English graduate students are
expected to demonstrate in several different forums: in seminars,
in theses defenses, in oral presentations at conferences, and
ultimately, in front of the classroom as professors. If you are
struggling for an approach to take for your paper, consider
beginning with a critical question; closely
analyzing a specific passage in detail (examining issues
such as subtext, gesture, language, symbolism, etc.); researching
additional theater reviews and writing an anatomy of a specific
performance that leads to a new interpretation of the text (by
examining the potential for different interpretations that
performance engenders); and/or arguing against a critical author's
assumptions.
Nota Bene: All
primary and secondary sources should be cited according to MLA.
Sometimes we will be reading more than one critical text. Please
choose your own focus: you do not have to write about every single
text we read, but should form a critical perspective that
definitely shows understanding of at least one of the secondary
readings that might apply to one or more primary texts. Every
seminar participant will write a position paper on assigned days
and submit it to the instructor (hard copy, typed, stapled, 12 pt.
font in Times New Roman, with 1" margins). In order to make
these works in progress pedagogically effective for all seminar
participants, please post your weekly writings on
Blackboard/Discussion Board in addition to handing in a hard copy
to the instructor.
Once
a semester every student will present his or her position paper to
the class. On these occasions, students should provide enough
copies of the position paper for the entire class and the
instructor, and should come prepared to read the paper aloud and
to contribute in a significant way to the class discussion. Or we
could agree to view the presenter's paper onscreen with the help
of a data projector, if we happen to be in a classroom that
facilitates this.
Evaluation: I will
read your position papers (hard copy only), comment on them, and
provide check, check plus, or check minuses as pre-evaluative
criteria. At the end of the semester, a portfolio of your position
papers will be evaluated for a letter grade (see below). The
presentation of your position paper is not graded, but you must do
it in order to receive a satisfactory Participation grade. Owing
to scheduling difficulties, I am afraid I am NOT able to read late position papers,
although you may include them as part of your top 5 papers in the
Final Position Paper Portfolio. I will NOT accept emailed Position
Papers. If you cannot attend class, I suggest you ask a fellow
participant to bring your hard copy to class. If you are unable to
turn in your Position Paper on time, I suggest you ask a fellow
student to read and evaluate the work-in-progress, or come and
discuss it with me in office hours.
- Check
plus = Very Good/Great/Excellent
(88-100 range): Shows excellent understanding of the
issues. Provides a clear and
original argument that articulates the reader’s
independent position about an academic debate and text-based
interpretation of the primary text, and needs very little or
no revision.
- Check
= Okay/Fine/Good/Very Good (78-87
range): Shows fine understanding of the issues and
debates. Provides a summary that may need some revision, such
as articulating the reader’s
position and argument, providing support for
assertions, and writing in an academic style.
- Check minus = Unsatisfactory/Okay
(0-77 range): Shows poor understanding of the issues.
Provides an unclear summary and points to no argument or
position on the part of the reader. Needs a lot of revision in
terms of clarity and/or style.
The Position Paper Portfolio will include a
critical introduction, your TOP 5 Position Papers, the original copies of the position
papers with my comments on them (behind each revised
copy), and at least 1 revision
that highlights your editing skills. If you wish to submit all 6 assigned analyses, you may; I
average the top 5 scores. If
you are not revising your original position paper, please just
hand in the original with my comments on it (do not reprint
another copy).
The cover letter should self-evaluate your own position papers and
address the following questions: How do these position papers show
the independence of your critical thinking? How would you describe
your (evolving) academic writing persona? What have you learned
about reading, researching, and the field of English? In what ways
have these writing exercises prepared you to become a better
student as well as to become a better researcher? How have these
writing exercises aided your thinking this semester? What are the
strengths and weaknesses of your position papers? Which is your
best position paper, and why? What grade would you give yourself
for this assignment?
Immediately following the cover letter, place a well-edited
revision of one of your position papers that highlights how well
you can transform your writing from rough to final copy. Even
though this is the only required revision, I encourage you to
revise all papers carefully. Please include all originals with my
comments on them. You should also include any position papers that
you’re handing in late--but only the five you are submitting for a
grade (I will only evaluate the first five papers). Here’s a final
list of everything you should include: 1) Cover letter; 2) Edited
Revision; 3) Original Position Papers; 4) Any late material.
Please simply staple everything together, or use a binder clip. No
cover pages or folders, please.