Session Start: Tue Mar 11 09:40:24 1997
*** Now talking in #spl
*** Judith (vitale@client-119-2.bellatlantic.net) has joined #spl
*** nancy (santeron@130.68.51.167) has joined #spl
*** Patricia (Giulianop.m@130.68.51.158) has joined #spl
*** Susana (alonsos@130.68.51.159) has joined #spl
*** Kristin (Antrosiglio@130.68.51.160) has joined #spl
 Susana has entered the building
* Patricia is here.
> Well, you all are right on time!
*** dudekes (dudekes@153.34.66.38) has joined #spl
> How did you all find this? Easier the second time?
 hey guys and gals
 yes
 i'm in my PJ's
* nancy nancy is here
 Yes, it was not difficult
 Much easier! I like working from home.  
> Great! and there is a student assistant there to help you too, 
right?
 yup
 yes
 How's FLA?
> To be honest, I haven't seen much of FL.
> I'm visiting my dad, whose wife died in November.
> And I've been working, preparing for conferences and 
especially classes.
 we should do this more often
> Anyway, today I hope to be able to rollerblade on the 
Hollywood boardwalk for an hour or two.
> Maybe...
*** dana (luisid@130.68.51.166) has joined #spl
> Hello, Dana!
 hello professor furr, how is florida?
> Haven't seen much of it -- hope to, though.
 how is the weather?
> Hi to Dave, Judy, Kristin, Nancy, Patricia and Susana.
 hi dave, what's up?
> The weather isn't too bad -- sunny now, was raining. Also, not 
too hot.
 dave is lucky to be at home and not here
 weathear sucks here
 hullo prof. furr
 You're not missing great weather here.
*** vi (FGHHG@130.68.51.164) has joined #spl
 Hi Vi
 HI JUDY
> Am I marked as 'back' yet? Hi, Vi!
 HI
*** Melissa (MBFmel@130.68.51.163) has joined #spl
 i didn't know you left
> Hi, Melissa!
  i can watch tv at the same time
 Hi, Prof. Furr! How's Florida!?
 jerk
> Not too bad. 
> Dave, what do you mean you can watch TV? on-screen?
 are you on the beach?
 hey dudekes, where are you?
 WHATpart of Florida, Prof Furr?  Near Tampa?
 What's on TV now Dave?
> I haven't seen the beach -- I'm in Hollywood, 500 yards from 
the Ft Lauderdale line.
 to bad there is no sound!
 Hi Judy, are you home in your slippers?
> My dad lives here and has Internet.
 dave, that is so not cool.
 My son lives in Tampa
> Dave, are you at home?
 is it price is right time?
 yep!
 No.  After class I have several errands to do.  I'm 
redecorating my daughter Michelle's room this week
> Very good! Anyone else connecting from their home, or not in 
the lab?
  Now if someone could walk my dog that would be 
perfect
 what kind of dog?
 bichon
 lazy butt, you can walk your dog!!!!!
 how do you exactly pronouce that?
 bee shon
 is that a small or big dog?
 I bet my cat could kick your dog's butt.
 tiny
 what's it's name
  i bet your right
 murphy
 as in murphy brown?
 you got it
 i take it she is a female?
  wrong
> OK, I'm back. Evidently the /away command isn't working well 
now.
 well then
 Prof. Furr, I don't know about anyone else, but I 
could use a little more time to get through Uncle Tom's 
Children...the dialect makes it a little more difficult to 
get through...
 I agree with Melissa.!!
  i second the motion
 Me too
 I third the motion
 Would you consider giving us until next Tues for first 
paper?
 the people have voted
 i have an idea, how about no homework!!!!!
> I have a suggestion -- but first, tell me something.
 what about the dog-what's his vote?
 very observant, Mr. Kessler!
> Did any message show up on anyone's screen that I was "away" 
for a minute?
 no
 yes
 no
 nope
 I agree the slang makes some of the passages difficult 
to read.   I've just finished how Mann rescued is it Mrs. 
Hartfield and her children and has now been arrested.  
 nope
 Nope
> Dana, are you in the lab, di-280?
 No
 why, yes i am
> Funny it showedup on your screen but not on anyone else's.
 Even the box on the right stayed constant
> Anyway, I suggest that we discuss Daughter of Earth, and leave 
the HW question for the end.
> Somebody else may drop in late, and we'd have to go over it 
again.
 fair enough.  
> Is that OK?
 yes
 yes
 yea
 Sure...
 ok
 Yes let's go.
* Furr is getting his copy of the book and his notes.
 someone's not prepared
 hey dave, stop watching days of our lives!!
 dave is getting coffee
> OK -- would someone like to comment on a passage on the theme 
of patriotism?
 Isn't I Love Lucy on?
 can i have some. light and sweet
> Melissa, how about your passages?
*** laura (wolkiewica@130.68.51.170) has joined #spl
> Hello, Laura!
*** frank (mine@130.68.51.155) has joined #spl
> Did you get my email?
> Hi, Frank!
 Sorry, I was helping laura get on...
 yes
 Hello I had trouble getting on
> Hi -- is all OK now?
> Looks like all are on -- see screen at right.
 thank you for the e-mail about the newspaper
> OK,Laura, good! I checked, and it is at that URL (no photos, I 
think).
> Melissa: do you have a passage we could begin with?
 I wrote on Marie's patriotism as emanating from her 
love of the earth and vice versa.  Early on, she associates 
her "love of country" with the earth...from watching her 
father toil.
> Could everyone please find one or two passages? We'll get to 
you.
> Melissa, do you have a page number?
 me too
 I agree . . . see page 276
 I don't have my book with me, but it's around 105 or 
so, when we first see a relation with the title "Daughter of 
Earth"...
> OK, let's begin with 276 -- a good choice. 
> Melissa, we'll get to the other one in a minute.
 i would like to say that Patriotism plays a very 
important role as well as education, racism, and sexism.  I 
choose the passage that dealt with the unfairness of Marie 
being confined into prison for acts she was not
 ok
 i found page  356 to be of some interest for it is 
where she decides that to help her fellow working class 
americans she must help the workers of the world first for 
they are all interconnected
 I'll find it in the meeantime...
 I chose the passage in which Marie explains to Beatrice 
the importance of not working for the war.  "...the country 
that would let her starve as it had our mother..." ( 252)
 I wrote on the same passage
 same here
 cop out
 no, true!
> OK, one at a time.
> Let's begin with a276.
> What does Marie mean by 'patriotism' here?
 Yes, 276 is relevant in that her conversation with 
Sardarji relates back to all she feels about the earth - she 
associates the "soil" with the working class
> Yes. She also asks "what does 'love of country' mean?
 Marie loves her country but not the government that's 
running it.  See the conversation between Marie and 
"Teacher."
 It means for her..."all of us who work and live and 
suffer"
 I don't think she loves any country
> I agree, Judy and Mel.
 i think Marie feels the earth is more important than 
those whole rule it.
 I agree with Melissa, she found that she loved the 
earth, "the soil" but could not love the country b/c by 
country she meant the government.
 For some, it means the people who run it...not for her 
though...
> What do people usually mean when they refer to "love of 
country"?
 She makes it clear she doesn't like the oppression of the 
people in her country.
 I think Marie is confused throughout the novel
 ditto
 i think she feels patriotic about the counrty just not 
the gov. and th eland owners
 her search for meaning goes unanswered
 i know she doesn't mean patriotism as in the sense of 
love of the "country".  She loved the land, she didn't have 
pride in the way it treated the people.
> I think there's an attempt to 'deconstruct' the meaning of the 
term 'patriotism', or 'love of country' here.
 an alteration
 the Indians loved their country though
 in what sense do you mean "deconstruct?"
 I think it is different for everyone...Sardarji 
certainly had a different view of "country" than Marie...his 
love stemmed from the culture, the language, etc. and 
everything that embodied the country
> She says that usually what people mean by 'country' is the 
people who run it.
 I agree.  We touched on this last Friday.   
> If I say, "I am a patriotic American", most people would 
understand that to EXCLUDE being a socialist or communist, for 
example.
 that is true
 the term "country" becomes relative to Marie's 
understanding of who she believes is on her level
> Marie means to redefine 'love of country' so as to mean 'love 
of the working people' and 'the land', but NOT 'the 
government' or 'the system.'
 Also on 276, she states:  "Today this is not our country, 
but theier country.  We are permitted to live only so long as 
we submit to them."  That tells what she feels.
 using the the term " the people who run it to mean 
patriotism" is hard becaus th epoeple in power today might 
not be in power tommorow
 Therefore, the dictionary defintion of the patriotism 
is the "love and loyalty for one' country".  Marie, takes the 
country as the earth of America, that is why she is the 
"Daughter of Earth.
 who is really on Marie's level though?
> Nice point, Susana! She loves 'the earth', not the ruling 
class or gov't.
 dana"  what do you mean?
 the working class-those who had to suffer
 like her mother
> There is an important, historical issue here.
 Yes, Prof. Furr, I think Smedley is indeed trying to 
"deconstruct" the very idea of patriotism...Smedley is 
forcing us to see patriotism from many different viewpoints, 
not just in the sense that we may have been
> Yes, I agree, Melissa.
 i still don't understand what you mean Dana. Could you 
emphasize?
 That is indicative of Marie's entire life.  She labored 
tirelessly.
 i think the only people who can love their country fully 
is the ruling class
 I think Marie first realizes that America is not her 
country on pg.326
> Nicely put, Laura.
 i agreed with susana about how Marie loves the soil and 
the earth, not the people who run it.
 I agree with Laura.
 because they have the power & in a sense own it?
> There is a good book that just went out of print before our 
course ... "Babouk".
 That is right Laura, because they have every thing 
they could ever wish for.
 good book
 they make the rules, so they have more to love about it.
> It was written by an American who identified strongly with the 
Haitian slaves of the 18th century.
 is it possible to still obtain this book?
 I'll have to disagree with you laura.  I love my 
country - the freedom it provides as opposed to other 
countries, the liberty I enjoy, etc. 
> Endore, who wrote "Babouk", says that the only true 'patriots' 
are those who are wealthy...
 And I'm certainly NOT part of the ruling class!
 Marie strove for an education so she can fight the 
wealthy that run the gov.
> Because they fight for their property, while the majority 
don't have any.
 do u feel u are free to do anything?
* frank never read Babouk
 Yes, Melissa, I agree. My parents and myself have been 
working class people all our lives. I too love my country.
> There is another issue here...
> Everyone is eager to be able to say "I am patriotic".
 i'm not
> Even if they have to redefine "patriotism" to do it.
> OK, Nancy, go ahead -- what's your view?
 I have grown up working class, yet i have many problems 
with our government.
 i understand how marie's view on her country not 
belonging to her
 there is nothing wrong with loving your counrty while 
still questioning it policies and taking up issues that you 
beleive in
 what don't you like about the gov Laura?
 i will not feel patriotic until i know that the 
government is working with me not using me!
 ditto
> Dave, I return you to the orginal question Marie sets here: 
what does "I love my country" MEAN?
 Me too...wouldn't we all want to live in a utopia if 
we could?
 How do you feel they are using you? Any relation to the 
way Marie Rogers was treated?
 we are the government.  Stop blaming "they"
 yes melissa
> Frank raises a good point.
 How are we the gov, Frank?
 how are we the government?
 r u saying we r a complete democracy?
> IF the country really IS "democratic", then WE are 'the 
government' in some sense.
 We are supposed to be the government, anyway!
 she loves her country as an idependent woman, expressing 
her free thoughts.
 In this country, although our judical system may be better 
than other countries, people of wealth are able to "buy"  
their freedom in  many cases, with $$ for high priced 
lawyers, whereas the middle class (or lower) ar
 to place the blame on others is to reliquish what little 
power you have
 We elected who is in office.  So in essence some of us 
are responsible for who is running the government.
 blame of what?
 it means i am free to live here in the USA and work as 
hard as i want and have the opportunity to succeed. And gain 
the the education that she was eventually able to gain to 
rais her social class 
 not quite true, I believe
 this topic is becoming a political movement here in 280
 go frankie boy
> That's right. IF you  think the country is democratic....
 the counrty is not the government.  do you think 
starving people are choosing to live that way?
 please slow down, I can't read that fast.
> This is the issue -- it's good that we are having a lively 
discussion of it.
 yes, starving people do have a choice
 You go, Laura
 marie suggests that when people say they love their 
country they r including the govn't and she doesn't
 ok they are choosing poverty?
> Smedley is outlining a view that the US is NOT really 
"democratic"...
 no but everyone has the opportunity to get ahead the 
difference is that for some the struggle is hardeer than 
others
> ... and that, therefore, this is NOT really "the country" of 
the working class...
 Obviously, most people are content with the way things 
are, otherwise we would be living in a time of war
 sometimes, I repeat sometimes, the poor do chose 
poverty.
> ... and that, therefore, "patriotism" is either BAD, or must 
be redefined.
 it's coming
 I don't think everyone does have the chance to get 
ahead.
 i agree
> These problems are inter-related.
 true opportunity is easier for those with $$$$
 How did Marie's people have opportunity? No matter 
how hard they worked they could never get ahead.
 what about Neewt Gingrich?  He made such a major fuss over 
welfare reform, and cheating, and look how he ripped off the 
gov/t himself.  What's his penalty?  $300,000 fine which he 
has the $$ to pay, and I just read tha
*** Dave (java@stuehlerd.montclair.edu) has joined #spl
 she got ahead
 one must come to understand that the natural state of a 
human being is one of self-interest
 maybe know one esle hard her ability?
 hi, who is dave
 then why did she leave her country?
 Hobbes states that for a society to exist, its members 
must agree to give up certain individual freedoms
 I disagree frank.  what about compassion.  self interst 
is a capitalistic concept.
> Can we relate Marie's view of 'love of country' to her CLASS?
 yes
> Marie is working-class -- the whole book is about her life as 
a worker.
 and its struggle
> So she sees almost everything differently because of this.
> And 'patriotism' is one of those things.
 sure can for her upbring is what she basis her feeling 
of patriotism on
 I don't think the working class in Marie's time had a 
choice, I do think we have more of a choice now...the 
struggles of her class were all she had to associate 
with...she she's the constant oppression, despite h
 Her class was the suffering. They had not much to love.  
She was subject to the upper class ruling, and had to fight 
all her life for survival.  The upper class never had to 
struggle financially.
 without this...compromise let's call it, the human 
animal would not be able to co-exist with the rest of its 
species in our cage called Earth
> Her brother goes off to the war.
 Marie enjoys working and struggling to better her life.
 she remembers her suffering not the freedom to work
 Whooooo...Frank...profound
 i wrote about that too
> Meanwhile, the US is suppporting England, which is exploiting 
India.
> So what is the war all about, really?
 frank you are quit poetic
 Marie is just like us, look at her that way
> Is it about "freedom"?
 colonialism and its allies
 the war is about getting "CONTROL"
 No, It's about Money!!
 both
 Money is control
 and Capitalism!
> Yes -- and the term "patriotism" is used to get young 
working-class men to fight in the war...
 It could be about money as well-they need money to obtain 
power.
 she not an idealistic child
> ... to support the aims of the government.
 Exploit them for the purposes of the rich...
 trust me if marie had grown up with $$$ none of this 
would be an issue
 Those two themes relate to Marie's theory. Isn't that 
ironic.
 correct, dudekes
> So this discussion on p. 276 arises inthe context of World War 
I.
 marie is just like us, yet she didn't end up loving her 
country, or even having a say in what was going on. she tried 
hard, but what has really changed since her time?
 Yeah, she might have had a whole different set of 
problems.
> Sardarji is an Indian anti-imperialist...
> .. but is NOT a socialist, remember.
> He and Marie agree, and also disagree.
> They agree in opposing imperialism...
 look...she realizes that she has to band with people of 
common interest in order to get her way, just like any good 
politician would
> ... but DISagree about the question of CLASS.
 he just wants the power for himself i don't think he 
cares about he workers
 Do you think Marie is a politician!?
 which is why marie stawho
 the working class are her people, let's not elevate them 
to a state of perfection, as if the workers constituted a 
utopian state
 whoops i meant to ask dudekes -who?
> Yes, he admits he doesn't think about classes, only about 
"freedom" from England.
*** Dave has quit IRC (Dave)
 Good going Frank. 
 in the absence of power, someone will attempt to grab 
control of the reigns
 Furr, that's because class issues don't involve him, 
or at least he doesn't think they do...
 this has been proven time and time again
> BTW, Dave, was Dave Stuehler -- a prof in the English Dept who 
installed the IRC server and wants to see, I guess, if we 
really are using it.
*** dudekes has quit IRC (Leaving)
 It's hard not to think about class issues when you're 
discussing India. 
> Dave K may have left by mistake.
 Distrust in the university
 a communist utopia is great in theory, but can humans 
achieve such a thing?
*** dudekes (dudekes@Cust38.Max11.Newark.NJ.MS.UU.NET) has joined #spl
 I agree with Judy.
> STUDENTS -- may I please suggest a pause, here?
 no
 nice to see you again, dave
 i am back
 where did you go?
> Pause, please...
 why don't we work harder for that utopia?
 pause?  As in "coffee BreakL"
 i got disconnected
> Laura, good point -- hang onto it a minute.
> That is what Marie is trying to do.
 it's not a matter of working harder...
 lets party
 i though maybe you spilled your coffee while watching the 
price is right!!
> Marie does not accept that this is the way the world HAS to 
be.
 now i can walk the dog
 does the computer drink
* frank grabs a beer
 what do you mean it is not a question of working harder?
> But again, let me suggest a pause -- I'd like to try to make a 
point or two here.
 The world does not have to be like this.
> Is that OK?
 correct she awants change
* Melissa enjoys one too
> Marie is trying to redefine patriotism.
 You guys get goin' early!!
> Throughout the 20th century, those who dislike exploitation 
and capitalism...
* dana would like a corona with lime
* Patricia wants one too
> ... have tried to still "keep" the term "patriotism" to 
include themselves, as well.
> Marie tries to do this on 276.
 what about prof furr. if i was in florida i would be 
drinking a pina colada!!
> .. but she has to radically redefine "patriotism" in order to 
do this.
 of course who wants to be thought of as unpatriotic
> That is the point.
> Even Marie -- at least here -- doesn't want to be thought of 
as "unpatriotic."
 exactly...I think everyone defines patriotism to suit 
their needs.
> But at the saem time...
 what exactly is her definition?
> ...she realizes that "patriotism" has in fact been "captured" 
by the capitalists.
 Doesn't Marie approach everything radically?
 the same as yours, Laura!
 Love for the earth
 When does Marie say she is patriotic?
 marie makes its clear what she means by love of country on 
276
> .. because most people would think you can't be "patriotic" 
and still hate the governement and hate capitalism.
 she says it in defending her idea of love of country
> In the US, "patriotism" has come to mean an adherence to 
capitalism as a system...
> ... and therefore this poses a problem for those who are 
opposed to capitalism...
> ... like the socialists, like Marie (and Smedley).
 Not necessarily, most working class people probably 
feel they are more patriotic than capitalistic white collar 
workers.
> Marie shys away from saying outright: "I am not patriotic"...
 Prof. Furr - do you think that the view of patriotism 
STILL necessarily has to include love of government for it to 
be considered valid?
> ... but she comes pretty close to it.
 i feel most in poverty r prone to hate the gov't
> I think that "patriotism" is understood in a certain way...
 that is not neccessarily true.  I can love my country 
without liking the ruling goverment and it's laws.
 that's not true either. 
 what's going on
> ... and that, if you oppose capitalism anbd the government, 
you can hardly be "patriotic":...
> ... at least, in a way that would be understood by most 
people.
> .. .and that's Marie's problem here, and why she redefines it.
> At least, those are my interpretations.
> It is interesting that the term "patriotism" is so powerful...
> ... that almost everyone wants to appropriate it.
> For example, the right-wing militias in the US today...
 Really! I disagree...I think patriotism is a personal 
thing...but I do think that we have been traditionally 
thought in terms of a patriotism inclusive of govt.
> ... are very anti-government, yet still call themselves 
"patriots."..
> .... but they remainvery loyal to capitalism.
 i think our country is going through major changes and 
the question of patriotism is relavent to these changes.
 They are fighting for what they see as the good of the 
country?
 or the people?
 if i were to approach a politician and discuss and these 
views,yes, in their eyes, i might not be patriotic.  in my 
eyes i am. Our country does not stand for the best rules and 
regualtions, but I would not want to l
 oh yes capitalism is ingrained into america. it is loke 
peanut butter and jelly
 Sounds like they are loyal to some other country, not 
one founded on democratic principles
* Melissa is hungry
> Dave K, you chose p. 356 -- which paragraph did you pick?
 democracy is nothing short of the political extension of 
social Darwinism
 I agree with Dana, I have grown into a family in which 
I am not always sure if the there is going to be food on the 
table tomorrow, but I would not want to live elswhere either.
 exactly frank. i agree with you here
> In Uncle Tom's Children, we see another side of the US, which 
calls the whole idea of "patriotism" into question again, in 
yet another way.
> And when we get to _Moscow Yankee_, we will see this issue 
again.
 test
 i think that page 356 is talking about how she views 
all working class people as in the same struggle and 
therefore no patritism is involved
> In "Big Boy Leaves Home," a soldier returning from WWI murders 
two black youngsters with impunity.
 frank, do you want to go for coffee sometime
> OK, Dave K!
 sure
 why not?
 I don't like coffee though
 let's digress
 impunity?
 ok how about tea?
 who want's to talk about the government anyway
 sure
> Dear Students: ...
 (an insurrection)
 just kidding
> ... for the sake of analysis, at least, it's good to make a 
separation between what YOU think as a person, and what you 
SEE in the novels we are reading.
 troublemaker...
> We can discuss both...
 generally, yes
> ... but there is a difference.
> ... Marie's views are not necessarily our own...
 everyone should voice their opinions now, take action
 type
> ... but, in trying to "deconstruct" the notion of 
"patriotism"...
> ... she can lead us to ask important questions.
 our perceptions of the novel allow us to be biased and to 
make our own opinions.
 Yes, but certainly the issues we read about are going 
to effect our own and vice versa
*** frank is now known as Marx
> Marie suggests the relevance of CLASS and EXPLOITATION to this 
concept of "patriotism"...
> .... and to much else.
*** Marx is now known as frank
 It can be difficult to make the separation Pr.Furr. talks 
about regarding Marie's opilnions vs our own.
> Marie has LIVED exploitation, so she knows it in "her skin", 
so to speak.
 I've got a duel identity
 Vi, you know about this issue from our Pursuits class.
> .. and this experience causes her to see EVERYTHING 
differently from many around her...
 I think she uses the issues of class and exploitation 
to invalidatee the very idea of patiotism
 I mean, it's very true what he says, just difficult to do 
when reading  the interpretation
> As we've seen, she sees the position of women differently...
> .. she sees "education" and the educ. system differently...
> .. and here she sees "patriotism" differently.
 differently from who?
 from the socialists, from the anti-imperialists
> Differently from most of those who -- naively -- accept the 
elite definition of "patriotism."
 isn't it best that we learn to see things through the 
eyes of others?
 right
 yes laura.
 everything is a state of mind, taking shape in that 
strange realm known as relativism
> Marie is asking (among other things): why should those who are 
exploited be "patriotic"...
 ok...
 we aslo need to learn things from our own experience.
> ... if being "patriotic" means being loyal to a governemtn, 
and to a system, which exploits them.
 I can talk like this for hours
> Her own brother is in the war.
 blah, blah, blah...Marie!
> Frank, that's what class is for.
> Frank -- you seem disturbed by the position Marie takes. 
That's fine. Let's talk about it.
 I'm not really disturbed, I'm just troubled by the same 
old routine
 which routine?
> Marie is certainly suggesting that "patriotism" as usually 
understood is in some basic way AGAINST the working class.
 Must Marie continue to see herself as oppressed?
 I think Marie is not discrediting patriotism 
altogether, just redefining it based on her experiences and 
what she wants the future to hold.
> Yes, she wants to redefine it as opposed to abandoning it 
altogether.
 yes because she is still oppressed!
 Marie viewed everything in life as oppressing her and 
her family.
> In the '20s and '30s -- and beyond --
> the socialist/communist movements still saw themselves as 
"patriotic"...
 Wasn't she correct in that?
 and yes, although she avoids using the word 
"patriotism" she still "loves her country" - is that not a 
form of  patriotism?
> .. but in some other, "higher" or better sense...
> I think this has changed since that time.
 It is redundant to state "I am a member of society" and 
then say "I am oppressed" one must naturally lead to the 
other
 shopuld we be using marie, as a tool to see our own 
futures?
 Marie just wants the  chance to make it in the world, 
she is tired of working hard and getting nowhere.
 yes Melissa it is, for her, maybe you and me, but for 
the rest of the country ( the gov), it is not.
> I think "exploited" is more useful here than "oppressed."
> "Oppressed" can mean a psychological or social state; 
"exploited" has to do with one's relationship to the economy, 
to employment, to capitalism.
 Who do you see as the oppressor(s) then, Frank?
 o.k. exploited is the better term.  Yet are
 suspence
 Yet is the line between the exploited and the exploiter 
so clear?
> "Daughter of Earth" explores the CLASS content of many ideas: 
education, sexism, and, here, patriotism.
 if so, would not this state of affairs have been changed 
long ago
 If we are a part of society are we necessarily 
oppressed in some fashion?
 I would agree that Marie was exploited
 marie was exploited true but she rose above it
> That's because Marie's unique life -- a working person who has 
gotten the wherewithall to write --
 how is that line not clear! i think it is the clearest 
thing we have in capitalism
 not really... she was still struggling when the book ended.
 if there is a will there is a way
> .. has empowered her to see things from a class perspective...
 She rose above it because, as previously stated, she 
loves her country despite its wrong doings.
 She was struggling till she died ( China)
 not so.  Picture yourself as "the capitalist tyrant" ok
> But what does "love your country" mean? The earth? How can you 
love the "earth", except metaphorically?
 nothing wrong with strugling we all do in some fashion
 now, would your values all of a sudden change?
* #spl is being logged
 would you necessarilly take pleasure in the exploitation 
of others?
 what about the ones that "run" the country...they are 
a part of society, are they oppressed (exploited)?  I'm just 
trying to explore this - I don't fall necessarily fall on 
either side
 Well, the Indians loved the earth, NO?
> Yes -- and the Indians fought against the country...
 please answer me, I am not an omniscient being
 Everyone is exploited.  Even capitalists.
> .. and to kill Indians was part of being "patriotic" in the 
19th century.
 I think that's a slight to the issue, to say nothing wrong 
with sturggling.  Marie had an awful lifestyle.  Poverty, 
ignorance.  Anyone from upper class would not have survived, 
should they  had been put in  her shoes.
 but the indians are still patriotic to their land
 i hope that i am of a better intergrity than that.  
goodd question frank
 now, let me make my point
 i must learn to spell
 or type
> Note how everyone, or almost everyone, still wants to 
appropriate the term "patriotism."
 ahh
 They fought against others, not the ground itself.  I 
respect that the Indians truly worship the earth, regardless 
of who governs it.
> Yes, this form of dialog puts those who can't touch-type at a 
real disadvantage.
 patritism has many forms not just love for the GOV.
 ...what time is it?
 I agree with dave
 10:30
 thank for the support
 frank where is your point?
 the exploiter is defined by it's opposite, namely Marie 
in this case
> But wouldn't most people think that a person could not be 
"patriotic" and reject the constitution and capitalism?
> Anyway, this is a good subject -- we will return to it in 
future books.
 continue..
 what do mean defined? I think that would be giving the 
working class she comes from more power than they have in 
actuality
 the exploiter is in the unique position, along with its 
fellow peers, where the goal of its microcosm is a monetary 
end, agree!
> Can we take a minute and talk about HW for Friday and for the 
Break?
 One's class structure determines in a large sense how they 
view the system.
 ok
 yup
 pleease
 ...
 ok
 I agree Vi.
> OK, here it is...
 none
 is that you're view or the dog's?
 let's vote
> First: I would like to know the telephone number of someone 
who will be home at some time on Thursday evening.
> Could someone type their phone number here now?
> I need tospeak to someone --here's why.
 201-614-1411 i have an answering machine 
 I can volunteer...I'll be home doing homework - 
777-2261
 i won't be home until about 8
> Today I'm in Hollywood at my dad's. 
> But Friday I'll bein Orlando, at a convention.
 tell mickey i said hi
> ... miles away from Disneyworld, I might add...
 sure
> .. in fact, I was there on Friday and Saturday and never got 
out of the hotel..
> Here's the deal...
 make sure you go and see them. i am sure your sons will 
love it
> I'm trying to make arrangements with Kinko's, at the 
convention center...
> .. they have a MAC on the Internet, but they do NOT have an 
IRC client on it...
> ... so they have told me I can come in Thurs p.m. and try to 
download one for myh use...
> ... they won't charge me for this...
> ... but I'm not sure I will be able to do it, as I'm not 
skilled in use of MACs...
> So I need to set up a contingency...
> ... I will call Melissa around 8-9 p.m...
> .. and let her know whether I have been successful in 
configuring the MAC so I can connect to you all at Kinko's 
Friday a.m.
> If Ihave been successful, we will have class Friday, like 
this.
> .. if I haven't been, then we can't, because I won't have a 
connection...
 so I will contact the class?
> So I'd like everyone to take Melissa's phone number...
 we can exchange numbers now...
> .. and phone her AFTER 9 P.M. FRIDAY.
> I think it's fairer to have you all phone her, rather than 
have her have to phone everyone else.
> does this sound feasable?
 can we call @ 4:00 am
 do you mean thursday?
 yesI should be home (20l) 538-0138.
 okie dokie
> Dave, I can also send an email to everyone -- but they might 
not get it. You will, of course.
 yep
 sure
 NO! and I think you meant Thursday...warning to you 
all I have Caller ID.  Judy, you need to call me...
> Melissa -- is this OK with you?
 who cares about the peasants
 okay
 ill
 the politico in action
> Mel, is this arrangement OK with you?
 what about uncle tom's children?
 Yeah, I'd rather do it by e-mail, so my phone isn't 
ringing off the hook...those who I can contact via e-mail, 
please seee me now.
> We're getting to that.
 so, what is the bottom line?
> OK, please set things up about contacting Melissa.
 come down dana
> I'd like to begin UTC but not have the papers due til after 
Break.
> I don't want to get TOO far behind.
 come down,where?
> If you do your paper before break, yhou only have reading to 
do over break. 
> Otherwise, you will have to write your paper over break.
     so the paper is due after the break?
> But I don't mind postponing the paper due date til the Tuesday 
after the break, which is march 25.
 sounds good...talk to everyone on thursday...please 
call me after 9pm but before 10:30 please.
> Still, I would like to begin discussion of UTC on Friday -- IF 
we have class. Is this OK? Doable?
 that sounds good to me
 did everyone get my #?
 no
 doable
 yes
 201-777-2661
 ok
 doable
 ok
 sure
> I will also email everyone. but if your only email access is 
at the college, you won't get it til Friday a.m.
*** laura has quit IRC (Leaving)
 you sure susana 
 about what?
> I don't want anyone to have to come all the way into college 
and then have to find out there's no class.
*** frank has quit IRC (Leaving)
 Dave and Judy, can I e-mail you about Friday...?
 coooooool
 sure
> Please ask Laura and Frank if this is OK with them -- 
theyshould be leaving about now.
*** Susana has quit IRC (Leaving)
*** Kristin has quit IRC (Leaving)
 you don't have to fuur G said he will
> Is this arrangement OK with everyone?
*** Patricia has quit IRC (Leaving)
 have a great time in florida!
 back to sleep
 this arrangement is fine with me.
> Thanks, I will try rollerblading later today.
> OK, Dana.
 Yes, speak to you on Thursday...have a nice time, 
Furr!
 yes
 that sounds like a lot of fun,have blades myself.
*** Melissa has quit IRC (Leaving)
> OK, thanks, Mel, for doing this for us.
 Bye Everyone!
> OK, you can all go now. This was a success, I think.
 thanks melissa.
*** Judith (vitale@client-119-2.bellatlantic.net) has left #spl
*** dana has quit IRC (Leaving)
 bye-have fun
*** dudekes has quit IRC (Leaving)
*** nancy has quit IRC (Leaving)
> Vi, all OK?
*** vi has quit IRC (Leaving)
Session Close: Tue Mar 11 11:05:46 1997