13) A Brief Introduction
Ludwik Kowalski
Department of Mathematical Sciences
Montclair State University, Upper Montclair, NJ, 07043.
Return to the clickable list of items
What follows is a paper on what used to be called, quite inappropriately, Cold Fusion. Several names have been proposed to replace this misleading name. My own preference evolved toward anomalous energy (AE) phenomena. This name focuses on the unexplained energy puzzle without trying to impose a premature interpretation. I am still not certain that AE is real but I think that scientific papers, including the one below, should be validated scientifically. I met the author of the paper at the International Conference on Emerging Nuclear Systems (ICENES2002) and became interested. He is a Russian scientist who has been conducting AE experiments for more than a decade. Two of his presentations have been published (1,2) in the ICENES2002 report.
As a Russian speaker I was able to help the author improve his presentation in English, a language in which he is far from fluent. We talked about his paper before it was formally presented, and we discussed it afterwards. What I heard in Russian was much clearer than his English translation. That is why I decided to improve it and asked the author to send me the original Russian text. He did this and I paraphrased it. The goal was to improve the readability of what may turn out to be a very significant scientific contribution. The text that follows is based on the original Russian paper, on conversations with the author and on what was presented at the conference. Naturally, I tried to stay as close to the original as possible. The author made several corrections and allowed me to make the paper available over the Internet. A large number of relatively recent articles about the AE phenomena are now available (3).
Claims made in the article are highly unusual and I am puzzled. Will Dr. Karabuts experimental findings, said to be ~100% reproducible, be confirmed by other competent scientists? I do not know; I am a physics teacher and only a part-time nuclear researcher. It was a great challenge to learn and to write at the same time.
(1) A.B. Karabut, Research into Powerful Solid X-Ray Laser (wave lengths
0.8 to 1.1 nm) with Excitation of High Current Glow Discharge Ions.
(2) A. B. Karabut, See the article below.
(3) These articles can be downloaded from http://lenr-canr.org/Features.htm
Return to the clickable list of items
Generation of Heat, Long-Living Atomic Levels in the Solid Medium (1 to 3 keV) and Accumulation of Nuclear Reaction Products in a Cathode of a Glow Discharge Chamber
A.B. Karabut
FSUE "LUTCH"
24 Zheleznodorozhnaya St. Podolsk, Moscow Region, 142100, Russia.
email: 7850.g23@g23.relcom.ru
This paper was presented at the 11th International Conference on Emerging Nuclear Energy Systems, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, October 2002.
Return to the clickable list of items
Abstract:
The described experimental results, based on (1), describe processes associated with the excess heat generated in a deuterium discharge chamber. A calorimetric method was used to demonstrate that thermal energy produced in the chamber can exceed the electric energy supplied to it by as much as 10%. The excess energy is attributed to nuclear reactions taking place near the surface of the palladium cathode bombarded by positive ions of very low energy (0.5 to 2 keV). The process is accompanied by the emission of protons (3 MeV), alpha particles (14 MeV), soft X-rays (up to 100 R/s) and the production of heavy nuclides (at the rates of up to 1013 atoms per second). Most of the results were statistically significant and 100% reproducible.
1) Excess Heat Measurements in a Flow Calorimeter
The apparatus used in these experiments consisted of a chamber pumped out down to 10-3 Torr and filled with hydrogen or deuterium up to 10 Torr (see Figure 1). The glow discharge was established between parallel plates, palladium-covered cathode and a Mo anode, separated by several milimeters. Other cathode materials, and other gases, were used in control experiments. The cathode, the anode, and the body of the chamber were water-cooled using three independent circuits. Each circuit was equipped with two thermoresistors, one at the input and one at the output, plus a flow meter.
Figure 1 (left): The glow discharge chamber used as a continuous flow calorimeter. (1, the discharge chamber; 2, cathode unit; 3, anode unit; 4,thermal insulation cover; 5, insulation of the anode cooling system; 6, the chamber cooling system; 7,the discharge chamber tube; 8, the chamber jacket tube; 9, windows in thermal insulation cover; 10, the vacuum hose; 11, insulation of the cathode cooling system.)
********************************************************
Figure 2: Results of calorimeter calibrations. Nearly 100% of electric energy supplied is removed as heat when the current was flowing through ohmic resistors placed inside the chamber.
***********************************************************
The heat excess rates, that is, differences between the thermal output wattage and the electrical input wattage, were measured using the Pd cathode in the deuterium gas. The results are shown in Figure 3a. The heat excess rate depends on the following parameters: current density in the discharge chamber, applied voltage, duration of current impulses (t) and duration of intervals between the pulses (T-t). Note that T is the period of repetition, the inverse of the frequency, from 100 up to 1000 Hz, of the electric pulse generator. The value of excess wattage tends to increase with input wattage. Note that excess power also increases with the time between the current pulses, (T-t). This indicates that releases of heat in the cathode continue to take place after the current is turned off (that is, between the consecutive current pulses). The largest excess of power takes place when the difference of potential is between 1000 and 1400 volts; further increase in the voltage results in a rapid decrease of the excess power.
Figure 3 (left): Excess heat power versus the electrical input power for the palladium cathode in deuterium at the pressure of 10 Torrs. The distance between the anode and cathode was 11 mm. Different curves in correspond to different duty cycles of the electrical power supply.
Figure 3b (right): Heat removed as a percentage of supplied electric energy. Different curves correspond to different duty cycles of the electrical power supply.
**********************************************************
Each curve in 3a or 3b corresponds to a different value of t/T, where t is the duration of the current pulse and T is the period of repetition. The curves labeled as 1,2,3 and 4 correspond to t/T being 0.22, 0.16, 0.11; and 0.054, respectively.
At some pressures (inside the discharge tube) the power excesses were found to be negative, as shown above (curves labeled as 5). Further investigations revealed that this is accompanied by a laser-like emission of X-rays, to be discussed later.
In several reproducible experiments the total measured energy released from the palladium cathode was 4 MJ during the total time of 120 hours This amounts to a mean rate of excess heating equal to 9.2 W, as illustrated in Figure 4. Measured excess heat rates could not possibly be attributed to a chemical reaction inside the chamber. The slight decrease of the excess power was most likely associated with the progressive deterioration of the palladium cathode.
Figure 4a (left): Dependence of the excess heat power on the duration of experiments. System Pd-D2; t/T=0.13, current 220mA.
Figure 4b (right): ): Same system as in 4a. Dependence of the total heat removed (expressed in terms of percentages of input power) on the duration of experiments.
************************************************************
2) Registration of Charged Particles
Protons and alpha particles were observed in a setup with a displaced anode, as indicated in Figure 5. They were counted by using plastic track detectors (purified CR-39, Fukuvi Chemical Industry, Japan). The methodology of detection was similar to that used in testing for radon. The observed average rates of emission turned out to be between 10 and 15 particles per second (up to 250 tracks per square centimeter of the detector area and per 6 hours). Some of the detectors were positioned to see the cathode, others were used to determine the background radiation inside the apparatus. Detectors was wrapped in protective Al foils of thickness between 11 and 33 microns. Protons with energies up to 3 MeV, and alpha particles of 14 MeV, were detected in experiments with the Pd, Ti and Ni cathodes (but not the Ta cathode) exposed to the deuterium plasma. The dependence of the number of tracks on the distance from the cathode, r, was found to be consistent with the 1/r2 law.
Figure 5: Experimental setup to study emission charged particles and x-rays. (1, discharge chamber, 2, cathode holder; 3, cathode, 4, anode, 5, beryllium window; 6, CR-39 track detectors; 7, glow discharge region; 8, TLD detectors.)
*************************************************************
A control experiment with the Pd cathode and ordinary hydrogen showed that the density of tracks in the detectors exposed to the cathode was essentially the same as in the background. In other words, protons seemed to be emitted from the Pd cathode exposed to the D plasma but not exposed to the H plasma, as illustrated in Figure 6. The left side graphs show distributions of proton track lengths in D plasma (each for different thickness of Al foils) while the right side graphs show corresponding distributions in the H plasma. As previously indicated, tracks recorded in the H plasma can be viewed as the background not associated with the processes inside the cathode.
Figure 6: Distributions of lengths of tracks in the CR-39 detectors recorded in the deuterium plasma (left side spectra) and in hydrogen plasma (right side spectra). The protective covers were: 11 microns of Al for a1 and b1, 11 microns of Al plus 60 microns of polyethylene for a2 and b2, 22 microns of Al plus 60 microns of polyethylene for a3 and b3, 33 microns of Al plus 60 microns of polyethylene for a4 and b4. The left side spectra (in deuterium) were collected in ten hours of discharge while the right side spectra (in hydrogen) were collected in five and a half hours of discharge.
********************************************************
The rates at which alpha particles and protons are emitted, at different voltages, and at two different currents, are shown in Figure 7. Note that the dependence of Dn (particles per second in all directions) on the discharge voltage is more or less exponential. The recorded rates, however, are much too small to be responsible for the observed excess heat power. It is conceivable that protons are associated with DD reactions; the emission of 14 MeV alpha particles remains a mystery.
Figure 7a (left): Emission rates of 3 MeV protons at different discharge voltages. 1, for the discharge current of 220 to 300 mA; 2, for the discharge current of 370 to 450 mA (Ti cathode in D2).
Figure 7b (right): Emission rates of 14 ± 3 MeV alpha particles at different voltages. 1, for the discharge current of 220 to 300 mA; 2, for the discharge current of 370 to 450 mA (Ti cathode in D2).
***************************************************************
3) Registration of Gamma Rays.
A Ge-Li detector connected to a multichannel analyzer was used to detect gamma radiation between 0.1 and 3 MeV. To reduce the outside background, the detector and the chamber were shielded by 10 mm of lead. Numerous radioactive isotopes responsible for the emission of gamma rays were identified on the basis of characteristic spectral lines. Gamma ray spectra, recorded during the discharge, and at different times after the discharge, are shown in Figure 8. In a typical experiment the discharge was turned off after tens of hours of the exposure to plasma and gamma rays could be observed for up to eight days before being reduced to the background level. The gamma ray background spectra were recorded during prolonged time intervals (up to several months) between the experiments (starting 10 to 14 days after turning the discharge off). The duration of a background recording could be as short as one hour or as long as 65 hours; fluctuations of background spectra were less than 10%.
Figure 8 (left): Progressive decrease of gamma radiation after ending an experiment in which a palladium cathode was exposed to the deuterium plasma. The (a) spectrum a was recorded during the discharge, the (b) spectrum was recorded one day after turning the discharge off; the (b) spectrum was recorded two days later; the (c) spectrum was recorded six days later; the (d) spectrum was recorded eight days later.
Figure 9 (right): Dependence of the intensity of gamma rays (at the end of an experiment) on the total number of current ions per unit area. Different symbols are used to distinguish four different combinations of cathode and gas, as labeled.
*************************************************************
The recorded counts per second were subsequently converted into absolute gamma ray intensities, I, expressed in counts per second, in all directions. This was done by assuming that the distribution of gamma rays is isotropic, by taking into account the geometry and by using known detector's efficiencies. The dependence of I on the exposure to plasma, immediately after a discharge, is shown in Figure 9. Note that the exposure to plasma is expressed in terms of numbers of ions per unit area. The dependence is more or less exponential and, surprisingly, not very different for the four cathode-gas combinations (Pd in D, Zr in D, Ag in H and Pd in Ar).
Groups of radioactive nuclides of half-lives ranging from 1 to 8 days were identified in the Pd cathode after its exposure to the D plasma for 8 days. The spectra shown in Figure 8 were analyzed in terms of two components: peaks and continua. The peak component exceeded the background by a small delta factor ranging from 2.5 to 5, depending on peaks. The continuous component, on the other hand, exceeded the background by a delta factor ranging from 8 to 10. The analysis of data, based on (2), led to the conclusion that gamma rays are emitted from the neutron-deficient (and thus beta-radioactive) nuclides with atomic mass numbers ranging from 16 to 136. In particular, all products of the following A=101 chain:
Rb -> Sr -> Y -> Zr -> Nb -> Mo -> Tc -> Ru
were identified on the basis of numerous peaks, as summarized below. The numbers shown are peak energies in keV.
Rb/Sr Sr/Y Y/Zr Zr/Nb Nb/Mo Mo/Tc Tc/Ru
111.6 128.3 98.3 119.3 157.5 119.9 306.85
271.6 163.4 118.7 140.6 180.7 533.5 545.06
251.6 474.1 216.9 373.9 276.1 590.9 623.8
363.1 510.7 133.8 597.8 280.2 1012.5 489.1
92.8 590.4 104.4 597.8 294.6 713.0 344.0
232.7 666.6 146.9 722.2 466.3 1599.3
1091.8 694.3 661.8 912.2 810.8 1590.1
1362.9 744.1 668.7 1095.8 797.1 1759.8
1124.8 729.7 1924.5 1042.6 2032.1
1062.9 2009.5 2041.2
2565.4 1957.6