Intellectual Prose: Assignments

This page is now complete . . .

Unit I Essay Unit II Essay   Unit III Essay   Unit IV Essay    Unit V Essay    Portfolio Assignment   General Evaluative Criteria

Unit I Essay--Problems in Popular Culture

The topic for Unit I is "Reading Strategies and the Media: Popular Culture," and your first essay assignment should also center on problems in (reading) popular culture. This paper must be 3.5-5 pages long (875-1250 words) and meet the following general evaluative criteria. What, exactly, you write is open as long as it refers back to the theme of problems in popular culture. However, your essay should narrowly focus on a specific aspect of popular culture (high versus low culture, daytime talk television, reality television, or  "morality" and the influence of television on young minds, etc.). In other words, your essay should analyze a specific problem in popular culture, give examples and relate these to your specific position on this problem, and conclude with some "solutions" to the problem your essay outlines. Please document your observations carefully, and citations from/analyses/incorporations of any of the articles we read in this unit are strongly encouraged. Thus, while no specific "answer" to this assignment is expected, it is expected that this essay be substantive, analytical, and represent college-level thinking and writing.

As with every essay in this class, each step of the writing process will involve student and instructor feedback. Here is the schedule of drafts and responses:

5. R 9/18
Write Unit I Essay, Rough Draft; bring two hard copies to class. Note: the first draft is a substantial piece of work, representing several hours of writing--perhaps exploring a topic, or working on one approach, abandoning it, and trying another. Bring Hacker's Writer's Reference to class.
6. M 9/22
Mid-process draft due; bring hard and/or electronic copies to class; and email it to instructor by 12:45 (as text in email, not attachment). Note: A mid-process draft is the re-working or extension of the materials of the first draft. Now your essay should really take shape in terms of content and depth. You have gone beyond description and into analysis. This draft will certainly be as long as your final draft.
7. R 9/25
Final Draft due. Note: A final draft is the re-working or extension of the mid-process draft. You need to hand in the first draft, the mid-process draft, and all notes (including peer-editing sheets and other notes) with the final draft. Please include journal entries for Unit I!


Unit II Essay: Understanding Generational Difference

This essay must be 3.5-5 pages long (875-1250 words)!


R 10/9 Rough draft due in class (two copies)
M 10/13  Mid-process draft due in class; deadline for sending second draft to instructor (optional)
R 10/16 Final draft due, including all drafts, peer reviews,  and journals (in separate packet); please staple the final draft on top
 
The goal of the essay for Unit II: Understanding Generational Difference is again to demonstrate competency in college-level writing, which signifies possession of the skills of advanced literacy, critical thinking, and intellectual prose.

As with the Unit I essay, you must work hard to design your own specific topic; to build an argumentative thesis; and to support your thesis with concrete evidence that is intelligently analyzed for the reader. You may consider the general subject of the essay as “understanding [problems in] generational difference.” One of the following options might allow you to refine your specific subject matter, which should be analytical, substantive,  and argumentative:

A) Creative / Analytical

Write a culturally specific short story of generational conflict along the lines of Gloria Taylor’s “Kiswana Browne,” Mary Gordon’s “More Than Just a Shrine,” or Maxine Hong Kingston’s “No Name Woman.” Then, write an analysis of your narrative (at least three pages). You might consider some of the following questions for your analysis.

What kinds of generational conflicts does your story depict? How are they resolved? Are these generational conflicts culturally specific, and if so, how does integration into (Anglo-) American society change the dynamics of these conflicts? How does your style of story-telling (based on cultural difference) compare to Taylor and Kingston’s?

B) Investigative / Analytical

Investigate, through concrete images in the media (internet, magazines, television, movies, advertising, etc.) what specific messages are being marketed to your generation.  These sources should be carefully documented  (and included in the essay if possible). Then, analyze the meaning of these images and make an argument that critiques them. You might consider some of the following questions. Do these images promote the so-called generation gap? Do these images project cultural diversity or tribalism? How much does marketing determine (or just reflect) the attributes of your generation?

Relevant reading for this assignment would be articles that theorize about generation and advertising (e.g., Mike Pope, Lawrence  Grossberg, Thomas Hine, etc.).  You should cite where your argument intersects with or draws from these sources.

The same general evaluative criteria for the first essay as well as the instructions apply to this essay as well.

Unit III (Documented) Essay: Violence and the Media


17.  R 10/30 Write a rough draft of the Unit III (Documented) Essay--at least 2.5 pages. Bring Hacker to class.
18.  M 11/3 Mid-process draft due; bring hard copies to class; and email it to instructor by 12:45 (as text in email, not attachment). 19.  R 11/6 Final Draft (incl. mid-process draft and peer-editing sheets) due

Your assignment for the third unit is to write an argumentative 3.5-5 page (875-1250 word) essay that stems from research on an aspect of violence in the media. At its center, the essay will discuss one primary source/media (film, music, video games, etc.). You must have at least 3 supporting secondary sources; one may be an internet-only source and at least one must be academic (peer-reviewed, refereed). Additional source material may come from interviews and/or essays in Reading Culture. An initial question that you might consider (but will of course revise and refine to fit your own topic) is: Is the media responsible for perpetuating fear and violence? The following list is designed to prompt you to formulate your own research question:

- Do video games cause young children to act violently, or does this media cater to a natural attraction to violence? 

- Does graphically violent music incite hostility in teens or allow them to vent aggression?

- Does the horror movie/story create hysterical fear in audiences or reestablish a sense of normalcy?

- Does news coverage of violent events inform the public of valid dangers or exaggerate violence?

Your success in this assignment will depend on two factors: 1) Specifying and revising your research question and 2) obtaining reliable sources. In addition to the general evaluative criteria used thus far in the course, you will be evaluated according to your skill in differentiating between different kinds of source materials and relating these nuances to your reader(s). You will also be evaluated on your success in citing sources according to the MLA Citation Guide (see also Hacker). Ideally your paper will conclude, as Brunwand’s essay does (p. 324 in Reading Culture) with ideas for future research projects. 



Unit IV Essay--Critique of the Art of Advertising

23.  R 11/20
Write Unit IV Essay, Rough Draft; bring hard and/or electronic copies to class.
24.  M 11/24 Mid-process draft due; bring hard and/or electronic copies to class; and email it to instructor by 12:45 (as text in email, not attachment). Things to think about over Turkey Day: What kind of cultural objects and practices does Thanksgiving celebrate?  25.  M 12/1 Final Draft (incl. mid-process draft and peer-editing sheets) due.

Your assignment for the fourth unit is to write an argumentative 3.5-5 page (875-1250 word) essay that critiques art, advertising, and/or the art of advertising. The producers of Ad and the Ego, Arthur Asa Berger (author of “Sex as Symbol in Fashion Advertising,” p. 187), and Jean Kilbourne (author of “Beauty . . . and the Beast of Advertising,” p. 193) all argue that advertising is the most profound educating force in America. What do advertising messages teach society, especially teenagers? How do marketing campaigns submit subliminal (or overt) “lessons” about living the so-called American dream? Why should we (an educated audience of critical readers and thinkers) be critical of the marketing world?  





Unit V Essay Assignment: Academic Writing (Revision)

26.  R 12/4

What is American culture? Revising for an academic audience

Read p. 370-73, 378-89; Bring the previous essay to class you have selected to revise (incl. instructor notes and comments)

27.  M 12/8

DI 277; Workshop: Peer review, self-assessment, and writing

Mid-process draft of revised essay due; you may, if you desire feedback, email it to the instructor by 12:45 (as text in email, not attachment). 

28.  R 12/11

Course summation/conclusion; Ideas and Strategies for ENWR 106; Writing across disciplines

Revision of a previous essay (Unit I-III) due


Though you will be revising all of your work for your portfolios, the final essay will allow you to receive a separate grade for a revision of an essay from Unit I, II, or III. You may revise an essay for which you received a grade lower than 83 or your lowest graded essay (whichever applies). Revising this essay is not simply a matter of ‘fixing’ mechanical errors (though you will need to do this too). Rather, your revision should be substantial, and you will be evaluated on the extent and thoroughness of your revising work. This means that you should present a new paper based on previous work, perhaps with a stronger thesis, supporting evidence, and conclusion. Attach the original essay to your final draft.



Portfolio Assignment
M 12/15
4-5 pm: 324 Dickson (safer, preferred) or 439 Dickson (mailbox); option for early delivery: under door of 324 Dickson or in 439 Dickson
Portfolio due

I. Attach a Portfolio Cover Letter to your Portfolio

The first part of this portfolio letter should explore and analyze what you have learned about intellectual prose. In a sense, I am asking you to “close read” the form of writing we have been producing all semester. What are its main features? How do the pieces work together? What is not acceptable in this kind of writing? What does this kind of writing tell us about the people who use it? Your goal here is to show that you have acquired “membership” in a general academic community of practice and that you “know” the rules of the game. Prove your membership by carefully explaining what is expected from intellectual prose, and provide an explanation of what this might tell us about the users of this genre.

The final section of this letter should build on the knowledge of intellectual prose that you have displayed in the first section. Use this last portion of your cover letter to highlight why your writing this semester shows progress toward developing the idealized academic discourse you described in the first part. In other words, how does your writing this semester demonstrate that you are prepared to participate in the world of letters and reasoning that constitutes the university?

II. Items to be Submitted





III. Format

- Items may be submitted in a folder, stapled or clipped together, or in a binder. Please make sure your name is on every (beginning) page. You may collect your portfolios next semester between 22 January and 22 February 2004 in 324 Dickson (check http://english.montclair.edu for office hours or email for an appointment).

IV. Evaluation

The portfolio assignment is in lieu of a final exam and therefore should represent a culmination of the skills and techniques you have learned this semester. Careful attention will be paid to the thoughtfulness of the cover letter and the extent to which you have revised your previous essays. The portfolio counts for 20% of your final grade.




Evaluative Criteria:

Remembering that an ‘A’ means that a student ‘goes above and beyond’ the basic requirements of an assignment, spend significant time brainstorming, drafting, and editing your paper. You will be evaluated by the following criteria; these evaluations will help you understand your essay's strengths and weaknesses:

TIPS:
  • Please simply staple, number, and label each page with your last name (no cover pages or booklets). Include a title. 
  • Papers should be no longer or shorter than the length assigned and submitted on time. Use twelve-point type, in Times New Roman or CG Times (or 10 pt. in Veranda, etc.). Late papers will result in grade reductions. Never submit a paper without proofreading it carefully.
  • Late papers will be penalized.
  • Please carefully proofread your paper; grammatically sloppy papers will have points deducted.
  • In order to avoid plagiarism and to guide your readers in following your sources, please cite texts according to MLA standards. You may use outside sources but are not required to do so. If you do use outside sources, please be sure to cite them properly.
  • Academic Honesty and Plagiarism: Definition of Plagiarism (from Student Handbook)

    "Plagiarism means the use of another's words as if they were your own, and the unacknowledged incorporation of those words in one's own work offered for credit.  The following guidelines for written work will assist the student in avoiding plagiarism:

                a) General indebtedness for background information and data is acknowledged by inclusion of a bibliography of all works consulted.

                b) Specific indebtedness for a particular idea, or for a quotation of four or more words from another text, is acknowledged by footnote reference to the actual source.  Quotations of 4 -5 words or more from a text are indicated by the use of quotation marks."

    Honesty is expected of you.  It is expected that the work you hand in will always be your own, and that you will never copy sentences, phrases, paragraphs or whole essays from any other person's work, for that is plagiarism.  Plagiarism is dishonest, and against both University policy and my own.  If you are ever unclear about how to cite another person or author's ideas, come see me or consult the staff in the Writing Center.  We can help you do this correctly.  It's important to understand that plagiarism is a big deal in this university and in my class.  Don't make this mistake.  Students who are caught plagiarizing will fail the course and be referred to the Dean of Student's office for disciplinary sanctions.


  • This paper will be evaluated according to the strength and clarity of its argument, validity of its support, and originality of its conclusions. In addition, evidence of each student's ability to communicate these ideas in writing weighs considerably on the final evaluation. Therefore, you are encouraged to engage in peer-review and extensive proofreading.
  • Students are encouraged to make use of the University Writing Center, located in Dickson Hall 285 (655-7442); students are benefited most by making an appointment, but drop-in hours are also available. I am more than willing to provide extra help and extra office hours! Please come to my regular office hours in Dickson Hall 324 or email me at nielsenw@mail.montclair.edu for an appointment.

CONTENT = 50 POINTS

Focus (having a main point): When you finish your paper you should be able to verbalize what the main point of your paper is. You need to have some overarching question that you are aiming to answer, or you need to be arguing for an interpretation of the unit's topic and readings. The focusing point should be reflected in each of the paragraphs in your essay.
  • The focus should also show significant strides towards the formation of a clear thesis, argument, and controlling idea, which (in excellent papers) is original (i.e., not a regurgitation of ideas expressed in class). Ideally, you will formulate an argumentative thesis, or a controlling idea that formulates a position on a topic. The opposite of an argumentative thesis is a descriptive thesis, which merely restates, in general terms, an issue without specifying the writer's position on the topic.

Development of a line of thought or point: A developed paper is one in which the main point is substantiated by textual evidence and thoughtful discussion. There are no precise rules on how to organize and develop a strong line of development. However, effective arguments are generally discussed in some depth. Importantly, regurgitation--re-telling what we already discussed in class or referring to general ideas without defining them in relation to the paper's main point--does not help you develop your point.
  • An organized paper provides readers with introductions, clear paragraphs, transitional cues, and conclusions.
  • The strength of the introductory paragraph, structure of supporting paragraphs, and the ability of the conclusion to summarize the paper's main point while pointing to new conclusions will also be considered.
  • Clarity: You need to have reasonable connections between paragraphs and between points. Proper use of language, grammar and mechanics all contribute to the clarity of your paper. the paper should also be well organized so that readers can follow points clearly and logically.
  • Topic treatment--the extent to which a writer has engaged and thought about the topic in a careful, thoughtful, and original manner.
  • Key to development is analysis, which is also referred to as reflection or critical thinking.

Reflection/Critical Thinking: Analysis is when a writer examines and explains events, beliefs, or experiences that have been discussed. Analysis is evident when a writer connects one individual experience with a larger phenomenon or when a specific quality is generalized or theorized about. Analysis is asking, and addressing, questions. Analysis is discussion.
  • You are expected to analyze, work or discuss the statements you make about topics and readings you are discussing. Be reflective--anticipate and answer the questions which readers might ask you. One way of thinking about reflection is to imagine that you are answering a series of questions that start broad and then move in closer as your analysis develops.
  • Excellent papers should show sophistication of thought.
FORM / STYLE = 50 POINTS (precision of words; appropriate level of specificity; sentence style is clearly structured and focused; minimal mechanical errors (run-ons, fragments, parallel structure, agreement, spelling, etc.).

Form/Style includes:
  • precision of words;
  • appropriate level of specificity;
  • sentence style is clearly structured and focused;
  • minimal mechanical errors (run-ons, fragments, parallel structure, agreement, spelling, etc.).

Writing as a process:
  • Papers will be evaluated on the progress you have made within this essay--drafting, use of peer review, self-assessment, and editing
  • Peer review: You will be evaluated on the quality and usefulness of the peer review work you do for your peers.
  • Proofreading: Proofreading errors are errors in spelling, capitalization, typos, missing words, etc.--that is, errors writers should be able to catch through careful re-reading.
  • Improvement: Students will be evaluated on their improvement from essay to essay.