New Page 1

< Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >

< Messages posted to thread: >

< From Date >

< Let's stick to the issues 06-Sep-99 >

< One for Cislo 07-Sep-99 >

< Picton Park? 07-Sep-99 >

< She got the money 07-Sep-99 >

< To She got the Money 07-Sep-99 >

< Two for Cislo 07-Sep-99 >

< Don't Blame Cislo 07-Sep-99 >

< Two for Cislo 07-Sep-99 >

< To Above 07-Sep-99 >

< To above 07-Sep-99 >

< Vader 07-Sep-99 >

< A Disappointed Softball Dad 07-Sep-99 >

< To Softball Dad 07-Sep-99 >

< Ellenport's had a busy day 07-Sep-99 >

< Not Ellenport 07-Sep-99 >

< same thing 07-Sep-99 >

< Inquisitive voter 07-Sep-99 >

< John K 07-Sep-99 >

< Can someone explain LOSAP? 07-Sep-99 >

< Don't make the same mistake twice 07-Sep-99 >

< What are their backgrounds? 08-Sep-99 >

< Jim Keenan 08-Sep-99 >

< Voter 08-Sep-99 >

< Wher has Cislo been 08-Sep-99 >

< One voter to another; 08-Sep-99 >

< Second Ward Voter 08-Sep-99 >

< Cislo backer 08-Sep-99 >

< If you are a Democrat PTA is all th 08-Sep-99 >

< Don't avoid the issue 08-Sep-99 >

< To Cislo Backer 08-Sep-99 >

< To: Cislo Backer 08-Sep-99 >

< To don't avoid the issue 08-Sep-99 >

< Chaim - to Jim Keenan 08-Sep-99 >

< HELLO 08-Sep-99 >

< Stop beating around the bush 08-Sep-99 >

< curious 09-Sep-99 >

< 09-Sep-99 >

< The Facts 09-Sep-99 >

< ??? 09-Sep-99 >

< What do you think? 09-Sep-99 >

< TO: Stop beating around the bush. 09-Sep-99 >

< LOSAP 09-Sep-99 >

< Totally disappointed 09-Sep-99 >

< Fireman Bob 09-Sep-99 >

< to fireman bob 09-Sep-99 >

< TRUE TEST 09-Sep-99 >

< To: The Facts 10-Sep-99 >

< Let 'em eat cake 10-Sep-99 >

< The Dem's Cheer. 10-Sep-99 >

< No Cislomania 10-Sep-99 >

< The Dem's Cheer. 10-Sep-99 >

< The Truth 10-Sep-99 >

< SOS 10-Sep-99 >

< 10-Sep-99 >

< To: Everybody is Laughing At Us 10-Sep-99 >

< Second Ward Resident 10-Sep-99 >

< Why Nevargic? 10-Sep-99 >

< What has Cislo done? 10-Sep-99 >

< So What? 10-Sep-99 >

< A taxpayer Just Once I would 10-Sep-99 >

< Give me a break 11-Sep-99 >

< Cislo 11-Sep-99 >

< Another moronic Demcrat 11-Sep-99 >

< HEY 11-Sep-99 >

< No Contest 11-Sep-99 >

< Why? 11-Sep-99 >

< ? 11-Sep-99 >

< pay better attention 11-Sep-99 >

< NOZZA,CISLO, NEVARGIC 11-Sep-99 >

< About Marty and Michelle 12-Sep-99 >

< VOTERS FOR ISSUES 12-Sep-99 >

< Cislo 12-Sep-99 >

< About Navargic 12-Sep-99 >

< It is pointless 12-Sep-99 >

< When every Dem denounces 12-Sep-99 >

< Vote for Nevargc. Vote for Honesty 12-Sep-99 >

< What is the difference 13-Sep-99 >

< just a thought 13-Sep-99 >

< Objective observer 15-Sep-99 >

< To: Objective 15-Sep-99 >

< Clark Voter 15-Sep-99 >

< How about Malcom X 16-Sep-99 >

< Objective 16-Sep-99 >

< To: Objective 16-Sep-99 >

< Amy to objective 16-Sep-99 >

< Voter 17-Sep-99 >

< The logical Choice - by JC 18-Sep-99 >

< Don't Be Tricked Again 19-Sep-99 >

< Bill Caruso- An Interesting Subject 19-Sep-99 >

< Non-Political Decision 19-Sep-99 >

< This is so true 19-Sep-99 >

< About Cislo 20-Sep-99 >

< How do you know 20-Sep-99 >

< To above 20-Sep-99 >

< Cislo 20-Sep-99 >

< Lenny 21-Sep-99 >

< Not Nevargic 21-Sep-99 >

< Not Cislo 21-Sep-99 >

< Let's have a Debate 21-Sep-99 >

< SECOND WARD VOTER 22-Sep-99 >

< To Second Ward Voter 22-Sep-99 >

< To second ward voter 22-Sep-99 >

< Are you kidding 23-Sep-99 >

< Disgusted 23-Sep-99 >

< No respect for the taxpayer 23-Sep-99 >

< What Justification 23-Sep-99 >

< TO ABOVE POST 23-Sep-99 >

< 23-Sep-99 >

< John K 23-Sep-99 >

< That is the point 23-Sep-99 >

< REMENBER THAT ON NOV 2 24-Sep-99 >

< !!!!! 25-Sep-99 >

< ATTENTION PICTON PARK AND DAWN DRIV 26-Sep-99 >

< Athene Cislo in Clark 26-Sep-99 >

< On Cislo 26-Sep-99 >

< Senior 27-Sep-99 >

< Cislo Supporter 27-Sep-99 >

< Democrats rule 27-Sep-99 >

< 27-Sep-99 >

< On Carmine 27-Sep-99 >

< 27-Sep-99 >

< Giordano... 27-Sep-99 >

< The "Ape Man" 27-Sep-99 >

< The Previous post 28-Sep-99 >

< Not as funny, though... 28-Sep-99 >

< So Sorry 28-Sep-99 >

< Laura to Elizabeth The pity is 28-Sep-99 >

< An observer come to think of it 28-Sep-99 >

< ??? 28-Sep-99 >

< Yeah, debate this... 28-Sep-99 >

< About Cislo 28-Sep-99 >

< Vote 29-Sep-99 >

< YEAH Carurso 29-Sep-99 >

< 29-Sep-99 >

< 30-Sep-99 >

< Forget Caruso 30-Sep-99 >

< a 2nd ward resident 30-Sep-99 >

< Forget the Signs 30-Sep-99 >

< Positions: 30-Sep-99 >

< ABOUT CARUSO 30-Sep-99 >

< ELECTION SIGNS 30-Sep-99 >

< we can't wait 30-Sep-99 >

< a 2nd Ward resident 30-Sep-99 >

< clark 01-Oct-99 >

< TO CLARK 01-Oct-99 >

< Old Ghost 01-Oct-99 >

< "Prediction" 01-Oct-99 >

< Candidate by Edict? 01-Oct-99 >

< 01-Oct-99 >

< Observer 01-Oct-99 >

< THE OLD WASHED UP REPS REFUSE TO GI 01-Oct-99 >

< To the jerk… 01-Oct-99 >

< As for Nevargic... 02-Oct-99 >

< Giordano in not a Figurehead 02-Oct-99 >

< 02-Oct-99 >

< Amy Not only do Clark dems 02-Oct-99 >

< clark 02-Oct-99 >

< Wrong again 03-Oct-99 >

< SOS SOS SOS 03-Oct-99 >

< clark 03-Oct-99 >

< Hey Ms. Cislo! 03-Oct-99 >

< Louie T 03-Oct-99 >

< Amy To Clark (parrot) with thanks t 03-Oct-99 >

< Ann T Byrd question to Clark Parro 03-Oct-99 >

< More Then 5 People 03-Oct-99 >

< To Louie T 03-Oct-99 >

< To above poster 03-Oct-99 >

< To Tats Wright 07-Oct-99 >

< To Observer (Oct 1 post) 07-Oct-99 >

< 07-Oct-99 >

< ELECTION POOL 07-Oct-99 >

< Great retort! 07-Oct-99 >

< 'A' student at Harvard to Tats Righ 08-Oct-99 >

< To Cislo 08-Oct-99 >

< Lets get to the point 09-Oct-99 >

< Why Address the issues? 09-Oct-99 >

< To Cislo 09-Oct-99 >

< About the Clark Democrats 09-Oct-99 >

< JUST PASSING BY 10-Oct-99 >

< taxpayer 10-Oct-99 >

< Thats it. 10-Oct-99 >

< dwbate 10-Oct-99 >

< flat foot 10-Oct-99 >

< Hey flat foot the ONLY 11-Oct-99 >

< To above 11-Oct-99 >

< Screw the berm 12-Oct-99 >

< Why would they debate 12-Oct-99 >

< Clark elections ARE popularity cont 12-Oct-99 >

< So why not debate 12-Oct-99 >

< ?? 12-Oct-99 >

< Charles Ramshaw 12-Oct-99 >

< Cislo's Campaign Slogan 13-Oct-99 >

< YOU GOT IT RIGHT 13-Oct-99 >

< Clark 13-Oct-99 >

< Cislo is a piece of work 13-Oct-99 >

< To above post 13-Oct-99 >

< to : to above post 13-Oct-99 >

< A VERY DISGUSTED TAXPAYER 14-Oct-99 >

< Another disgusted taxpayer 14-Oct-99 >

< Spice Girls??? 15-Oct-99 >

< Let's Rock and Roll 15-Oct-99 >

< Who Cares 15-Oct-99 >

< To who cares 15-Oct-99 >

< to all three who cares 15-Oct-99 >

< Clare re the who cares 'trio' 15-Oct-99 >

< No Contest 16-Oct-99 >

< To Who Cares 16-Oct-99 >

< But Cislo is so much prettier 16-Oct-99 >

< Picton Resident 17-Oct-99 >

< Attention Picton Park and Dawn Driv 17-Oct-99 >

< Not everybody has Internet 17-Oct-99 >

< Athene we can't be critical of 17-Oct-99 >

< To Athene 17-Oct-99 >

< 18-Oct-99 >

< ???? 18-Oct-99 >

< Keep Reading 19-Oct-99 >

< After the Election 19-Oct-99 >

< To Clare 19-Oct-99 >

< Letter from Cislo 19-Oct-99 >

< Athene re letter from Cislo 19-Oct-99 >

< Who 19-Oct-99 >

< ????? 20-Oct-99 >

< Voters beware 20-Oct-99 >

< 20-Oct-99 >

< 21-Oct-99 >

< A reader to I know who is posting 21-Oct-99 >

< Amy to to Clare 21-Oct-99 >

< About Sherlock 21-Oct-99 >

< These threads ... 21-Oct-99 >

< Charles Ramshaw 23-Oct-99 >

< Clare BUT She is the type of person 23-Oct-99 >

< LeRoy 24-Oct-99 >

< ralph 24-Oct-99 >

< Mr,Reason 24-Oct-99 >

< About Nevargic 24-Oct-99 >

< Cislo's propaganda 24-Oct-99 >

< Amy What would happen in Clark if 24-Oct-99 >

< Lisa G To Mr Leroy 24-Oct-99 >

< About Cislo 24-Oct-99 >

< Cislo's comments 24-Oct-99 >

< A curious voter who is also 24-Oct-99 >

< Keep up the desparate attacks! 25-Oct-99 >

< BBC 25-Oct-99 >

< To BBC 25-Oct-99 >

< Cislo vs. Nevargic 26-Oct-99 >

< Athene to Anyone who can tell us 26-Oct-99 >

< A reader re Desperate Attacks Oct 2 26-Oct-99 >

< LeRoy 27-Oct-99 >

< 2nd Ward Resident 28-Oct-99 >

< the Gestapo - oh sorry, this is sti 28-Oct-99 >

< So What Else Is New In Clark At Ele 28-Oct-99 >

< Voter 28-Oct-99 >

< clark 28-Oct-99 >

< Bill Caruso 28-Oct-99 >

< Clark Eagle 10/28/99 28-Oct-99 >

< Wow. 28-Oct-99 >

< 28-Oct-99 >

< Elroy 28-Oct-99 >

< Mickey 28-Oct-99 >

< Taxpayers 29-Oct-99 >

< 29-Oct-99 >

< To Above 29-Oct-99 >

< 2ND WARD VOTER 29-Oct-99 >

< John on Coldiven Rd. 29-Oct-99 >

< John on Coldevin Rd. 29-Oct-99 >

< Just a cheer 30-Oct-99 >

< Athene Ever notice 30-Oct-99 >

< CHARLES RAMSHAW 30-Oct-99 >

< Nevargic is Obstructionist to 30-Oct-99 >

< Cislo should not be elected 31-Oct-99 >

< The Democrats and Cislo 31-Oct-99 >

< Cislo's Lies 31-Oct-99 >

< NEWS DESK 31-Oct-99 >

< Scocer Mom 31-Oct-99 >

< TO SOCCER MOM 31-Oct-99 >

< We Will Remember 31-Oct-99 >

< A Senior Citizen wanting Senior Hou 31-Oct-99 >

< clark 31-Oct-99 >

< Lenny from Fulton 31-Oct-99 >

< What Chuck really wrote 01-Nov-99 >

< VOTER 01-Nov-99 >

< Voter 01-Nov-99 >

< When all is said and done 01-Nov-99 >

< Ellenport is not stupid 01-Nov-99 >

< True but Sad 01-Nov-99 >

< Clark is a premier town to live in 01-Nov-99 >

< On premier towns 01-Nov-99 >

< Disgusted with the money people!!! 01-Nov-99 >

< Sheriff Froehlich and Michele 01-Nov-99 >

< WHAT A SICK JOKE. 01-Nov-99 >

< Nevargic All The Way 01-Nov-99 >

< TO WHAT A SICK JOKE 01-Nov-99 >

< Clark 01-Nov-99 >

< Clark Eagle 01-Nov-99 >

< 02-Nov-99 >

< Clark Has Hope 02-Nov-99 >

< Love thy neighbor 02-Nov-99 >

< Dawn Drive 02-Nov-99 >

< Hot news 02-Nov-99 >

< Updated Hot News 02-Nov-99 >

< Outcome Was Predictable 02-Nov-99 >

< other mistakes 02-Nov-99 >

< What did we learn tonight 02-Nov-99 >

< Nevargic Deserved This 03-Nov-99 >

< Congratulations Pete 03-Nov-99 >

< LOSAP 03-Nov-99 >

< Amy to Clark Nov 1 post 03-Nov-99 >

< 03-Nov-99 >

< LOSAP 03-Nov-99 >

< It's official 03-Nov-99 >

< J.H. Barr 04-Nov-99 >

< To: J.H. Barr 04-Nov-99 >

< Lisa G to 'Clark' Thanks 04-Nov-99 >

< To Charles Ramshaw 04-Nov-99 >

< Athene re Lisa G 04-Nov-99 >

< Where are the Dems Now? 04-Nov-99 >

< Ellenport 04-Nov-99 >

< To above 04-Nov-99 >

< Regarding Trash Disposal 04-Nov-99 >

< Loose Cannons 04-Nov-99 >

< Ellenport keeps on lying 04-Nov-99 >

< Bill Caruso 04-Nov-99 >

< The Weather? 04-Nov-99 >

< Ellenport's pathetic weather excuse 04-Nov-99 >

< Finally... 05-Nov-99 >

< Voter Turnout 05-Nov-99 >

< To: Voter Turnout 05-Nov-99 >

< Pete Nevargic 05-Nov-99 >

< Amy to B.Caruso Nov.4 Post 05-Nov-99 >

< To Mr. Nevargic 05-Nov-99 >

< Standing in the crowd 06-Nov-99 >

< To: Standing in the crowd 06-Nov-99 >

< To standing in a crowd 06-Nov-99 >

< Subject: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Let's stick to the issues
< Date: 06-Sep-99 >

Who would you vote for?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >One for Cislo
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

Mr. Nevargic may have the dedication and I do not believe his concern will continue if he is elected. He also comes off with a mightier then attitude maybe this is from being a cop but Mrs. Cislo, seems genuinely concerned and would work for the community. Look at the work she has done for Picton Park.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Picton Park?
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

Has she really done anything?

There is not one resident on that committe that is going to vote for her.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >She got the money
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

$15,000

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To She got the Money
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

We are so impressed. Her colleague refers to us as a PAIN IN THE ASS and we're just supposed to run to the polls and vote for her.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Two for Cislo
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

Cislo through her work in the medical profession has shown her concern for people. She is also involved in the PTA and is willing to listen to her constituents. She is working to get Picton Park and Funtime Junction. She has a vision of the town being for all the people and to stop the political games.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Don't Blame Cislo
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

Don't blame Cislo for Kuchar's screw up.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Two for Cislo
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

She's not playing a political game????? Give me a break!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To Above
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

Oh that is right Nevargic is playing it straight with no politics.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To above
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

Only politicians can play politics. Who is the incumbent in this race?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Vader
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

If Pete Nevargic was not truly concerned about Clark and his 2nd Ward, why did he attend the Excecutive session of Council the very next night after he narrowly lost in "98?" Most people who lose elections go into the wind and have a bitter feeling after the loss. Nevargic continued his concerns for Clark before anyone would have thought thier would be another election this year. If Nozza didn't quit, I am sure Nevargic would have continued his concerns. The proof is he didn't fly off into the wind in Nov. Ms. Cislo is just another popular name with no political sense. A prime target for Ellenport to continue his curse over the taxpayers of Clark. I personnaly would not support Cislo, not because she isn't a "nice person," she is. She is just another "Yes Mayor what ever you want" person. As far as Picton park, give me a break. The extra money was an Ellenport democrat freeholder SCAM to B--- S--- all of Clark. WAKE UP PEOPLE!!! Or Clark will continue to get what it has been voting for.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >A Disappointed Softball Dad
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

Vader is 100% correct. Look at Marty Ferrara, what a dope he turned out to be. A real Ellenport dummy.

I voted for Marty, but I'll never do that again.

I truly like Marty as a softball coach. Not as an elected official.

People of the Second Ward, don't let this happen again: Our tax dollars are a stake!

PS

Marty, buy a suite and tie, the regular guy look is out on council. Look good, vote good. Look like a dummy, you'll vote like a dummy.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To Softball Dad
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

What could Marty's attire have to do with his voting record? I bet this post was made by a republican in disguise.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Ellenport's had a busy day
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

It's nice to know that you are monitoring these threds on a minute to minute basis.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Not Ellenport
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

Ellenport is not monitoring these threads it is the all the Secretaries the office.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >same thing
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

same thing

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Inquisitive voter
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

I'm debating who I should support in the 2nd Ward Council election.

I know that Mayor Ellenport and Michele Cislo, the Democratic candidate are supporting the LOSAP referendum.

I would like to know where Mr. Nevargic and the Republican party stand on the LOSAP proposal. Is he for it OR against it?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >John K
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

I do not live in the second ward, so take this for what it's worth. Despite the fact that she starts off with two strikes against her, due to the fact that she was hand picked by Ellenport, I'll wait a little longer before I make up my mind because I'm not totally convinced that she's just another pretty face. I'd like to see her take a stand on Dawn Drive; something similar to what she has already tried to do for Picton Park. We shall see what we shall see.

P.S. - Let's try and not make this thread deteriorate like some of the others. This is important.

John K

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Can someone explain LOSAP?
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

what is it?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Don't make the same mistake twice
< Date: 07-Sep-99 >

For those who voted for Nozza instead of Nevargic, based upon what has happened in the last year I think that most reasonable people would switch their vote to Pete this time around. What's that old saying-those who did not learn from history are doomed to repeat it? Think about it. The image that Cislo is projecting now is not too different from the way that Nozza tried to project himself. Cislo is not a bad person, but where she is lacking is that she is not proven to be independent. Pete will give his constituents an independent voice and frankly that is what's needed most now. And this comes from someone with no ax to grind.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >What are their backgrounds?
< Date: 08-Sep-99 >

I know Nevargic was a police officer and Cislo was in the PTA. But what's the extent of their political experience?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Jim Keenan
< Date: 08-Sep-99 >

According to Mr. Nevargic's campaign literature that he passed out in my neghborhood this passed week-end, I believe his political involvement encompasses his candidacy for Union County Sheriff in 1995, he states: he is presently an elected County Committeeman for his party, he was the Governors' Clark coordinator for her re-election last term, he was Ernie Spies's campaign chairman for 1st Ward Councilman, Sal Bonnacorso's campaign coorinator for Council-At-Large seat, and if you can call attending every Council, Exceutive Council, and Budget Hearings over the past three + years, policitcal involvement, I geuss there is some political experience. Has he held any political office other than County Committee, no. Now as for his opponent, she was given her present position on Council by mayor Ellenport, had no party affiliation since she first became a registered voter in 1990, and only became a member of the Democrat party one or two weeks before her appointment to the 2nd ward Council seat...which was by the way; the first Council meeting she ever attended. So I think as voters with a choice, what we have to weigh is, "What you see is what you get."

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Voter
< Date: 08-Sep-99 >

I beg to differ with you Mr. Voter, Ms. Cislo is a PTA member, I think that counts for some points.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Wher has Cislo been
< Date: 08-Sep-99 >

Does anyone know what Mrs Cislo's accomplishments have been? Other then being involved with the PTA and a nurse.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >One voter to another;
< Date: 08-Sep-99 >

DOES THAT MEAN THAT EVERY PTA MEMBER IS QUALIFIED TO BE A COUNCIL MEMBER?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Second Ward Voter
< Date: 08-Sep-99 >

I think Mrs. Cislo would make a decent councilperson, but I could not vote for her as long as she refuses to take a stand for her ward residents. She has failed to show that she has any guts when it comes to voting for what her constituents want, if it is not what the Mayor wants. Its a parking lot issue now, what will it be when it involves some other issue that has to do with what the Mayor also dosn't want? Right now she knows the parking lot issue in her ward is a very big concern of the people that will either vote for her or not, yet she will not take a stand for fear she will say something that will offend the Mayor. I can not trust her to do the right thing for me in the future. I live at the other end of the ward and the parking lot issue does not effect me. I trusted Mr. Nozza with my vote. I was repaid with abdication!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Cislo backer
< Date: 08-Sep-99 >

Hey come on, being a PTA member, a mother of four, and a husband who is involved in little league has always been good qualifications for council in this town before, why change now?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >If you are a Democrat PTA is all that counts
< Date: 08-Sep-99 >

The Democrats motto is put up popular and not competence. Just look at the current Democratic make up. Marty (lets play ball) Ferrara, Richard (I say nothing) Kazanowski, Marie (I will say anything, no matter how stupid) Soyka, Michelle (happy, happy, happy) Cislo, Bill (If I shout you will be afraid) Kuchar and our favorite Greg (they were not intimidated, run!!!) Nozza. What qualifies her for a position on Council?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Don't avoid the issue
< Date: 08-Sep-99 >

Mr. Nevargic's resume seems impressive, but so does Ms. Cislo's.

BUT,,,,,,, WHERE DOES MR. NEVARGIC STAND ON LOSAP??????

OR FOR THAT MATTER, OTHER ISSUES AND PROBLEMS OF THE TOWN??????

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To Cislo Backer
< Date: 08-Sep-99 >

Why would you live in the past, in the 16th century england you could kill you wife for no reason, so lets live in the past.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To: Cislo Backer
< Date: 08-Sep-99 >

So let me get this right, you are in the PTA so you can run a town? why stop there why not go from the PTA to CEO of General Motors.

Is a mother of four more qualified then a mother of 2? Then why stop there let get a mother of 10 to run, just think of those qualifications.

Her husband is a baseball coach? My father is a 3 star general, I can run the army can't I.

No wonder Ellenport won, with this blind following he could not lose.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To don't avoid the issue
< Date: 08-Sep-99 >

What are Mrs. Cislo's qualifications? I wnt back through the postings and I did not see one posting stating anything other then the PTA and a Nurse? As for Cislo's position on LOSAP she is taking the "political" position get the Fireman's vote instead of the citizens position. I will bet she could not spell LOSAP.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To don't avoid the issue
< Date: 08-Sep-99 >

What are Mrs. Cislo's qualifications? I wnt back through the postings and I did not see one posting stating anything other then the PTA and a Nurse? As for Cislo's position on LOSAP she is taking the "political" position get the Fireman's vote instead of the citizens position. I will bet she could not spell LOSAP.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Chaim - to Jim Keenan
< Date: 08-Sep-99 >

You said - "she was given her present position on Council by mayor Ellenport, had no party affiliation since she first became a registered voter in 1990, and only became a member of the Democrat party one or two weeks before her appointment to the 2nd ward Council seat...which was by the way; the first Council meeting she ever attended."

You are correct. She seemed to come out of the blue when Ellenport selected her. You have to ask yourself, "Why her?" She was obviously selected for a reason. I just can't figure out why?

There are too many dark clouds hanging over her selection. It just doesn't add up.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >HELLO
< Date: 08-Sep-99 >

Mr. Nevargic, we're still waiting for your position on LOSAP.

Are you going to join Ms. Cislo's "political" position for votes from the Firemen and First Aiders OR will you represent the taxpayers concerns?

My family wants to know how to vote!!!!!!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >I am Home
< Date: 08-Sep-99 >

You already know that Cislo is in favor of LOSAP and if Mr. Nevargic is in favor of LOSAP what choice would you have? I guess yours is a one issue vote.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Stop beating around the bush
< Date: 08-Sep-99 >

The above answer is vague. I still don't know if Mr. Nevargic is FOR or AGAINST LOSAP.

No, I'm not a one issue voter. My mind won't be made up, until I hear both candidates on ALLLLLLL the issues that are afflicting our community.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >curious
< Date: 09-Sep-99 >

<< she was given her present position on Council by mayor Ellenport, had no party affiliation since she first became a registered voter in 1990, and only became a member of the Democrat party one or two weeks before her appointment to the 2nd ward Council seat...which was by the way; the first Council meeting she ever attended>>

Okay, a question. What did Ellenport promise Cislo to get her to accept the council spot?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 09-Sep-99 >

I see in the Eagle that we just bonded $1,400,000 with interest will cost the town over $3,000,000 during the next 15 years. And the big arguement is over $50,000 for LOSAP. You are correct LOSAP is an issue, but the most pressing, I don't think so.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >The Facts
< Date: 09-Sep-99 >

Forget Cislo's vs Nevargic's qualifications the winner will be the most popular and which party gets the vote out. Since, there are no major contests I predict that there will be a minimal turnout. The limited turnout will favor the Democrats, since they have the support of the retired population, and the PD, FD and Ambulance squad who can motivate a large group of votes fairly easily. These groups will support the democrats spending habits, not including falling for their promises e.g. pensions, new fire truck etc. The other would be the PTA's influence of electing one of their own and the final nail in the coffin of the republicans is the sport effect of the Cislo baseball coaching. It does not look good.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >???
< Date: 09-Sep-99 >

Is LOSAP a big second ward issue?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >What do you think?
< Date: 09-Sep-99 >

Have the basebal team make up a chear for Cislo?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >TO: Stop beating around the bush.
< Date: 09-Sep-99 >

The one time that the tax-payers of Clark have the final say as to how much money they are willing to spend out of thier tax dollars for any particular issue passed by thier Council representatives, and you want to wait to see how some candidate is going to vote before you make up your mind? Take the bull by the horns and vote the way you see it as best serving you. You will probably wait a very long time before you get this opportunity again. I believe Mr. Navargic seeks true representation, at least that's what he is telling everyone. To me that means what the people want, is what thier council person should try to give them. There is no truer statement of the desires of the public than the "Referendum Vote" under the democratic process. In my opinion Mrs. Cislo, with her indorsement of LOSAP, is telling you what is good for you, before you have the opportunity to tell her, what you, as the person who will pay the bill, really wants! Let me get this straight...you want me to listen to an Ellenport appointed councilwomen, who never attented a council meeting, (as purported on this Web, author unknown), and vote in favor of LOSAP because she is endorsing it? I think not. You have the opportunity to vote what is in your heart, and I might say, in your pocketbook, so stand up and use it for God's sake. People are always making statements about politicans making decisions that are not in the best interest of the tax-paying public,well "we" now have the choice. So lets tell the politicans what we want for a change. Wheather you are for LOSAP or against it, MAKE A STATEMENT WITH YOUR VOTE!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >LOSAP
< Date: 09-Sep-99 >

I don't want to see LOSAP but I do not want another Democrat even more. So if Mr. Nevargic is in favor of it fine, because I know you can not and will not agree with everyone all the time. And in this case another mindless Democrat will cost a lot more then $60,000.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Totally disappointed
< Date: 09-Sep-99 >

REGARDING THE LAST COUNCIL MEETING.

Well here we go again. The good people on Dawn Drive are getting screwed again. I understand at the last Council meeting, the Council put on the agenda, a resolution to hire Amertech Engineering to perform engineering services for the construction of the Brewer Municipal Building Parking Lot, in the amount of $4,950.00.

The Town Council has not received an official resolution from the Board of Education authorizing the construction of this parking lot yet. How foolish and obnoxious can the Council be????

The Council knows full well that the people on Dawn Drive living within 200 feet of the proposed parking lot, have not received official notices, or have had the opportunity of a public hearing concerning the parking lot.

Mayor Ellenport and the pusillanimous members of the Town Council are pushing ahead to RAM the parking lot down the throats of Dawn Drive residents. When advised by Councilwoman Memmer, that the BOE is not prepared at this time to approve any parking lot until a total development plan is introduced to them, they still refused to remove the resolution from the Agenda.

Mayor Ellenport, then successfully pushed aside the Long Range Planning Committee of Council and stated that HE and Mr. LaBella will meet behind closed doors with Dr. Ortenzio and Mr. Timoni to gain approval of the parking lot.

One has to wonder, what closed door, hanky-panky agreement will surface at the next Council meeting.

Where was Councilman Sal Bonaccorso when this private meeting was agreed upon? I understand there were no comments from him questioning this closed door meeting. Was he out of the room at the time?

I hope the Council will be wise enough to understand, that they can't approve funding for the engineering study, unti the BOE, at a public hearing, and by a public resolution, authorize the parking lot. Until then, the Council can't take any official action on this project.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Fireman Bob
< Date: 09-Sep-99 >

This entire Picton Park situation reminds me of the the following -

Ellenport is like a fire fighter who secrectly starts a fire and then accepts praise when he and his people put it out.

Ellenport started the Picton Park blaze and he is setting it up for Cislo to accept the praise for putting it out. Hopefully the second ward voters will not be fooled.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >to fireman bob
< Date: 09-Sep-99 >

so true... and she has not taken a stance on dawn drive. i'd like to see her talk to Ortenzio and start to back up these poor residents. this would prove that she is deserving. why? because, unlike picton park, Ellenport does not want this fire put out.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >TRUE TEST
< Date: 09-Sep-99 >

PICTON PARK DIDN'T MEAN THAT MUCH TO ELLENPORT. THIS IS WHY HE GAVE IN TO THE RESIDENTS, EVEN AFTER RECEIVING ONLY A LITTLE RESISTANCE. . . THE TRUE TEST FOR CISLO, THE TEST THAT WILL TELL US ALL IF SHE IS NOT JUST ANOTHER ONE OF ELLENPORT'S PUPPETS, IS DAWN DRIVE. . . IF SHE ATTEMTPS TO HELP THE SITUATION PRIOR TO NOVEMBER, SHE CAN STAND ON HER OWN AS A VIABLE CANDIDATE. IF NOT, SHE'S ALL PUPPET, TO THE CORE.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To: The Facts
< Date: 10-Sep-99 >

You write in your post that Cislo will win her election based on the fact that she has the FD, PD, First Aid Squad, PTA, retired residents and sports vote. What if some of the people the democrats know don't live in second ward? If this was true the democrats would have won every election. First ward has not been won by the democrats for a while. The force of Picton Park and Daw Drive residents will put Cislo at a disadvantage. Retired residents will also give her a second thought because of how high their taxes are.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Let 'em eat cake
< Date: 10-Sep-99 >

<
< Date: 10-Sep-99 >

Lets cheer!!!! Cislo !! Cilso!! She is our woman, if she can't screw it up Ellenport can.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >No Cislomania
< Date: 10-Sep-99 >

In the last year, the voters have witnessed the mayor's bankruptcy and the sad Nozza saga. If people are still willing to elect a democrat to this seat, it would be a sign that they don't see anything wrong with anything that has happened. I for one think that people are smarter than that and that Pete will win by a surprisingly large margin.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >The Dem's Cheer.
< Date: 10-Sep-99 >

Lets cheer!!!! Cislo !! Cilso!! She is our woman, if she can't screw it up Ellenport can.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >The Truth
< Date: 10-Sep-99 >

Keep in mind this is not an election it is a popularity contest and the winner will be decided by the unobtainable democratic promises that will never come to fruition. Just look at last year's election promises. Senior citizen tax rebate - result no rebate; Daytime ambulance coverage - result no coverage; Responsible spending - result 9 point tax increase; Funtime junction "funded with private donations" - result no park, oney coming from township bonds or money that should have gone to the town from the Coke agreement;

Let's see what the promise this year, new fire truck, LOSAP, raises for township employees, the sky is the limit, but the people will bite and elect Cislo.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >SOS
< Date: 10-Sep-99 >

The entire town is nothing but one big joke.

Everybody else is laughing at us.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 10-Sep-99 >

That is why we need to get Cislo elected, she truly cares about the town and is going to work for the people. She will add credibility to the township and assist in any of the citizens needs.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 10-Sep-99 >

We have to get as far away from Ellenport as we can. This will gain back some of the credibilty. This is the only way.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To: Everybody is Laughing At Us
< Date: 10-Sep-99 >

Most people that live in a town would vote out public officials that are not benefiting and doing what is right for the town. The last Board of Education election was a great example of voting out the incumbents after they were for deregionalization and taxes increased tremendously. Now that we have the chance we should vote out the democrats. The second ward residents have not been happy with their second ward council person for some time now. It is time for a change. All other towns should be an example to Clark in changing their public officials. They have been in control too long and have done too much harm to the town. Be like other towns and make the right choice in November.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Second Ward Resident
< Date: 10-Sep-99 >

We need help. The current situation is not working. We have to give Nevargic a chance.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Why Nevargic?
< Date: 10-Sep-99 >

Why not give Cislo a Chance. I have not seen one reason why I should vote for Nevargic except for he is not Cislo.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >What has Cislo done?
< Date: 10-Sep-99 >

What has Cislo done? And please don't mention Picton Park, that entire situation smelled rotten from day 1. The firefighter analogy was perfect.

Nevargic has always been active in township issues. He has consistantly been at town Council meetings and isn't affraid to let the current politicians know when they are about to do the wrong things. He has served the town in many other smaller political jobs, something that can not be said for Cislo.

The first Council meeting that she attended was the one where she was sworn in. Something is very wrong with that picture.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >So What?
< Date: 10-Sep-99 >

Nevargic attends council meetings so does Helen R; I guess we should ELECT HELEN!!! Nevargic is on the township zoning board and votes against every builder there is an accomplishment. What has he supported I have not seen him get up and say one thing at the council meetings. So much for Nevargic.

In contrast Cislo, is supporting the LOSAP program, looking to build a walkway over the Central Avenue bridge, is a member of the PTA and why not talk about Picton Park, she is the one who got the money and brought the 2 sides together to get the park built. Michelle cares about Clark and is willing to do whatever it takes to get elected.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >A taxpayer Just Once I would
< Date: 10-Sep-99 >

like to see an election that would result in the promise made by the voters to throw out the politicians that were unresponsive and arrogant. Just for once voters, lets carry out our threat to fire them. Make an example of the most glaring offenders so that they think twice before they dare ignore, belittle, or show contempt for any taxpayer or group of taxpayers.

In Clark we should have Township council meetings, not King Robert's Court and his Knights of the Round Table ready to slay any taxpaying dragon who questions King or Court. They want closed door sessions? Fine. The voting booth is private and closed. They want to surprise us ? Better we surprise them .

Another mayoral sycophantic voice on that Council is one more too many. As to who is the incumbent, you only have to know that our Ms.Cislo is an APPOINTED incumbent and not a duly ELECTED incumbent. There is a B I G difference.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Give me a break
< Date: 11-Sep-99 >

All that Cislo has tried to do is to clean up Nozza's mess. The making of the council lady is as orchestrated and as phony as a Hollywood movie. Nevargic has a track record of standing up for people in the ward. Whether Cislo would become an advocate for the residents is all guess work because she just popped up out of nowhere after Mr. Nozza's sudden resignation. Her lack of support for the people on Dawn Drive is a bad sign right off the bat that she will not be able to distance herself sufficiently from Ellenport. And if that's the case, her election just means more years of rancor in Clark.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Cislo
< Date: 11-Sep-99 >

CLARK TAXPAYER'S LET'S UNITE IN THIS ELECTION!!!!!!!!!!

Any campaign promises that have been made in the past have been broken after an election. Let's all remember the Democrats past history. It happens every time. As far as Mrs. Cislo doing something for the Picton Park residents that will be an empty promise too after the election. WE NEED A CHANGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Another moronic Demcrat
< Date: 11-Sep-99 >

I am another moronic Democrat.

I like Michelle Cislo because she is better looking than Nevargic, and she is in the PTA.

Even though she loves Ellenport and has no political experience, I don't think she will be another Ellenport puppet.

I think that her support of LOSAP shows real political courage and independence.

I think that she will get a bridge over Central Avenue, even though it is cost-prohibitive and the elderly people who need it most won't be able to use it.

I REALLY believe that SHE is responsible for "bringing the two sides together" over Picton Park.

I am voting for her because I am a complete moron.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >HEY
< Date: 11-Sep-99 >

AT LAST THE DEMS TELL THE REASON WHY THEY ELECT DEMS THEIR REAL MORONS?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >No Contest
< Date: 11-Sep-99 >

Nevargic is so much more qualified. It's not even close.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Why?
< Date: 11-Sep-99 >

Why should I vote for Nevargic? Give me specifics on why, not why I should not vote for Cislo.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >?
< Date: 11-Sep-99 >

Does Marty Ferrara own a suit? Or even a sports jacket?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >pay better attention
< Date: 11-Sep-99 >

I guess looks is what make the difference with you. So what the man doesn't wear a suit! Next time when your flipping through the Tv take a look at Cranford,Rahway council meetings not everyones in a suit. I hope you all have better things to do then to worry about Marty's wardrobe.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >NOZZA,CISLO, NEVARGIC
< Date: 11-Sep-99 >

No matter who runs or who wins for 2nd ward there will always be that handful of people who will have a problem with him/her. and to those people who try to drag Michelle through the coals I hope to see your name on the running list for 2nd ward since your so quick to judge another person.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >About Marty and Michelle
< Date: 12-Sep-99 >

Marty does not have much going for him from the start. If councilmembers in other towns fail to wear a jacket to their meetings, Marty should run for office there. Everyone else on the Clark Council wears appropriate atire. To not wear a jacket shows a complete lack of respect for the position and for Clark. We could overlook Marty's casual clothing if he had a brain and at least voted as independently as he opts to dress. We could overlook his clothing if he proved that he is not another Ellenport puppet. In the end, Marty's clothing is just a side issue but it does demonstrate a lack of respect. Look at Kuchar, he has beautiful suits but is one of the biggest Democratic puppets that Ellenport has ever dug up from the sewers. At least Marty does not call residents "pains in the ass" while the tape is on.

If Marty did not just sit up there and parrot whatever Ellenport demands, if he really voted for what was best for Clark instead of voting for what is best for Ellenport, I wouldn't care if he wore a dress.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >VOTERS FOR ISSUES
< Date: 12-Sep-99 >

WE THE PEOPLE WOULD LIKE Mr. Nevargic to define his position on all the issues . HE HAS NOT TOLD US WHAT HE STANDS FOR.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Cislo
< Date: 12-Sep-99 >

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >About Navargic
< Date: 12-Sep-99 >

Unlike Nozza, Nevargic stands for what his constituants want, rather than what he specifically wants.

Unlike Cislo, Nevargic doesn't have a supreme ruler pulling his strings.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >It is pointless
< Date: 12-Sep-99 >

It is pointless to discuss Nevargic's platform on these threads. Most of the people here who are asking about "where he stands" won't vote for him no matter what he says. It should be enough that unlike Cislo, he doesn't trust Ellenport.

Now the feds are apparently investigating Ellenport and his method of "rubber stamping" the signature of other town employees to sign $220,000 checks. Maybe they're curious about why a mayor, whose town is being sued by a contractor, would agree to officiate at the marriage of the very contractor who is suing the town?

They seem to be looking at Ellenport's policy of awarding town contracts to companies that have a habit of driving up $1 million in cost overruns. They're examining how Clark can pay a "tax map" company $70,000 and get absolutely nothing in return, and then find out that the company basically doesn't exist.

All this from a mayor who TWICE subdivides his property, despite having hundreds of thousands in liens against the property. All this from a mayor who conveniently manages to stop FOUR personal mortgage foreclosures at the very last minute.

Does anyone see a pattern here? Despite all of this irregular activity, why do the Democrats continue to trust Ellenport so much? What must happen to make Cislo (or for that matter Kuchar, Kazanowski, Ferrara and Soyka) publicly denounce Ellenport?

Until the Democrats disown Ellenport and permanently eject him from their party, Clark will continue to be embarrassed and get more of the same. It's about time the Democrats realized that is is THEIR party, and not ELLENPORT'S party. Until Ellenport is out, it is obvious that voting for ANY Democrat simply means another Ellenport "rubber stamp" on the town council.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >When every Dem denounces
< Date: 12-Sep-99 >

the the entire Clintonista wing and Dems are Dems again. When Dems break lockstep in party formation and people see for themselves and believe what they see. Every negative about Ellenport is not and cannot be rumor or innuendo. Even published facts do not mean anything to them. The blind eye to corruption in this party is pervasive in the country. Why should Dems in Clark be different? We know all about Reps--but we are talking about the present administration in Clark.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >When every Dem denounces
< Date: 12-Sep-99 >

the the entire Clintonista wing and Dems are Dems again. When Dems break lockstep in party formation and people see for themselves and believe what they see. Every negative about Ellenport is not and cannot be rumor or innuendo. Even published facts do not mean anything to them. The blind eye to corruption in this party is pervasive in the country. Why should Dems in Clark be different? We know all about Reps--but we are talking about the present administration in Clark.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Vote for Nevargc. Vote for Honesty
< Date: 12-Sep-99 >

A vote for Pete Nevargic is clearly a vote for the real people in Clark. Nevargic's opinions on issues echo is constituents' beliefs; he is his own person and not another Ellenport hack like Cislo. The fact that Ellenport supports Cislo is the main reason why she does not deserve your vote. She is as dishonest and as obedient to Ellenport as every other Democrat on Council. Do not give Cislo any credit at all for Picton Park. Ellenport contrived that entire scandal and forced Nozza to resign just so he could place a hand picked Democrat who would appeal to the young parents on Picton Street and all of Clark. Ellenport pulled all the strings and let Cislo take credit which she does not deserve. The one Councimember involved in Picton Park who really deserves credit is Councilman Bonaccorso. You know Ellenport would never let Sal share in anything positve. I believe Ellenport did all the behind the scenes work for Picton and let Cislo bask in the limelight. She is as putrid as every other Ellenport hack. Cislo is involved in Picton Park only because Ellenport wants her there.

Ellenport is not so concerned with Picton Park so he allows Michelle to continue her involvement. Ellenport is wild with rage over the Dawn Drive parking lot. That is an issue with which he is very involved. He wants that parking lot and will get it despite the many land use and zoning laws he has already broken and will continue to break in the future.

To determine if Cislo deserves your vote,examine the Dawn Drive issue even if you live on another street. The parking lot and manner by which the Democrats have handled it typifies the way they allow and encourage Ellenport to do whatever he wants no matter whom he is screwing. The Dawn Drive issue is a metaphor for all of Clark. The messages the Democrats are sending are "Ellenport can do whatever he wants and none of us will stop him." Cislo is really disgraceful over the Dawn Drive problem because she realizes that her boss is torturing those residents and she refuses to intervene on their behalf. She knows Ellenport wants that field paved and she will not say a word. A decent and honest Councilperson would stand up to Ellenport and at least ask him to relocate the parking lot despite their party affiliation. Cislo will never do anythng like that; she is a full blown Ellenport puppet.

In contrast, Pete Nevargic has already attempted to help the Dawn Drive group because he is a good person and a good neighbor. When Nevargic joined the Dawn Drive struggle, he proved once more that he is a caring citizen who is devoted to helping the people. Cislo is devoted to helping Ellenport and no one else. For some reason, these Democrats follow Ellenport blindly because they must share in the profits earned by Ellenport's dishonest schemes. A vote for Nevargic will put power back into the hands of the people and steer it out of Ellenport's dishonest clutches. If you want to see a man who clearly benefits from Ellenport's dishonesty, take a look at Mr. Timoni. That alone should make everyone want to vote out every Democrat.

In an attempt to make Cislo look fair and impartial, Ellenport will stage a scene during a Public Meeting where he directs Cislo to argue with him over the parking lot. He will tell Cislo to sit there and demand that he move the lot away from the homes because her constituents find it offensive. She will really make it look good in her cutesy way but she can't fool anyone. Her silence on the issue during these months has proven what she really is...an Ellenport lackey.

A vote for Nevargic is a vote for integrity and honesty in government. That is something Ellenport's Democrats stole long ago. If you want to know what Nevargic stands for remember...he stands for you, not for his party boss.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >What is the difference
< Date: 13-Sep-99 >

Cislo - Wants to waste money on LOSAP, Picton Park and Fun time Junction. Nevargic - Wants to waste money on LOSAP, Picton Park and Fun time Junction.

Nevargic walks in lock step with Bonacorso. Cislo walks in lock step with Ellenport.

Cislo does not have the backbone to stand up to the administration and fight against the Dawn Drive Parking lot. Nevargic sends a couple of letters and thinks that shows a backbone.

What are our choices?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >just a thought
< Date: 13-Sep-99 >

Even if as previous post says that there may not be so much difference between democrats and republicans, if we can all agree that the biggest problem facing the town is Mayor Ellenport then the choice becomes clearer. Besides being an embarrassment, Ellenport is a divisive force and a poor administrator. The man is bankrupt and the town is being investigated by the Feds. That says a lot right there, but worst of all is his personal vendettas when he uses the power of his office to harass people who dare cross him. That being the case, it seems clear to me that the best hope of a better future for Clark is choosing the candidate who is independent and has the guts to stand up the Mayor. With Cislo, we don't know what to expect. Nevargic is his own man and that is why I will vote for him.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Objective observer
< Date: 15-Sep-99 >

If the second ward wanted the best possible representation on Council, someone should talk Gary Cancro, the president of the Clark Little League, into politics. The guy is by far the best possible representative in this town. He is a family man, compassionate, bright and dedicated to the community. All this with no political ax to grind. What the best rep? He's the guy. And he lives in the Second Ward.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To: Objective
< Date: 15-Sep-99 >

Are you saying neither Cislo or Nevargic are family man (woman), compassionate, bright and dedicated to the community and political pawns?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Clark Voter
< Date: 15-Sep-99 >

As we can all observe by the post, "Objective Observer" above, the most important prerequisite for the present day Clark voter is still Little League participation. When will you people learn? Didn't voting for Marty Ferrara teach you anything? Being involved in community activities and a family man or women is very honorable and good, but it that where you stop when looking for a candidate to have control of a 15 million dollar budget? Do these qualities of a home body and first base coach rise to the occasion when you are looking for a representitave who will devote two to three nights a week at committee meetings, along with Council meetings, budget meetings, Excecutive sessions and God knows what else, for $2,800 a year? Open your minds and think back at what you voted for in the past, and what you got in return!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >I have another selection
< Date: 15-Sep-99 >

Mother Teresa she was community oriented, always willing to help, she was a teacher, she put others problems before hers. What do you think?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >How about Malcom X
< Date: 16-Sep-99 >

He was a leader, he could rally people around him and always told his followers what hey wanted to hear.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Objective
< Date: 16-Sep-99 >

You do not deserve good representation. And your nastiness underscores the blackness in your hearts and bleakness of your minds. May your tax dollars be flushed in the toilet with your personalities.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To: Objective
< Date: 16-Sep-99 >

You are taking life to seriously. You need to settle down.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Amy to objective
< Date: 16-Sep-99 >

I thank you . You went straight to the bottom line. This website is a mirror of what YOU posted. We do not have good representation so therefore, as you obviously know, our money IS going down the toilet. Where is your money going ? Can you see how YOUR 'good' wishes match OUR black hearts ? Our brains are hardly bleak but that's better than having a brain that is blank.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Amy to objective
< Date: 16-Sep-99 >

I thank you . You went straight to the bottom line. This website is a mirror of what YOU posted. We do not have good representation so therefore, as you obviously know, our money IS going down the toilet. Where is your money going ? Can you see how YOUR 'good' wishes match OUR black hearts ? Our brains are hardly bleak but that's better than having a brain that is blank.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Voter
< Date: 17-Sep-99 >

I do not like either of them. But a vote for Nevargic is a vote against Ellenport and his cronies

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >The logical Choice - by JC
< Date: 18-Sep-99 >

Everyone agrees Ellenport is bad to the bone. It's hard to fathom a Mayor who can't pay his mortgage and taxes, and a Mayor who has treated second ward residents as badly as he has over the years. Ellenport is the real problem and we need to get him out.

~~ Don't you just chuckle when ever he talks about the town's finances? I know I do. ~~

We're stuck with Ellenport for now, but we should not allow him to have another Council member that will allow him to do as he pleases. We need Nevargic as the second ward Concilman. It's the logical vote to try and put some contraints on Ellenport's very questionable activities.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Don't Be Tricked Again
< Date: 19-Sep-99 >

Well next week is the big vote for Picton Park residents. Mrs. Cislo seems so eager to help these residents to get their fence and playground equipment.As of September 9th's Clark Eagle she will bend over backwards to do anything that she has to do to make sure that these residents are happy. Of course she will she wants to win her election in November. Interestingly enough the newspaper states that some of the park will be worked on this year and some next year. What do you think will happen after Cislo is elected in November. There will be another vote not to do anything for the park and the money will be distributed as usual somewhere else. Picton Park residents don't have a prayer for next year unless they elect Nevargic and get more republicans elected the following year. Picton Park residents unite and get out the votes to defeat Cislo.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Bill Caruso- An Interesting Subject
< Date: 19-Sep-99 >

The Clark Eagle's editorial on Sept. 9th was quite amusing. Everybody always blames Bill Caruso. This is so true no matter what political party you are in. The democrats are so guilty of this. Every election they try to pin Bill Causo on whoever is running for office whether they have anything to do with him or not. Stay tuned in the coming weeks before the election for the democrats to use this in their campaign. After all empty promises are all they are capable of and they need some kind of campaign.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Non-Political Decision
< Date: 19-Sep-99 >

Democrat or Republican - It doesn't matter. Ellenport is not fit to be mayor. Voting for Cislo just gives Ellenport more power. Clark does not need that.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >This is so true
< Date: 19-Sep-99 >

Someone wrote ~~ Don't you just chuckle when ever he(Ellenport) talks about the town's finances? I know I do. ~~

My God! This is so true.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >About Cislo
< Date: 20-Sep-99 >

You are absolutely right. Cislo will make all kinds of empty campaign promises until November. After the election if she should be elected she will do whatever the Mayor tells her to do. Even it means breaking every promise she has made. Citizens beware of what is down the democratic road after election day. Vote for Nevargic and give yourselves a chance to be treated the way that you would like to be treated.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >How do you know
< Date: 20-Sep-99 >

Maybe Cislo will surprise you,she is concerned with the citizens and will not be lead by Ellenport.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To above
< Date: 20-Sep-99 >

Oh please, where have you been? There is no way in the world that Cislo is anything but an Ellenport flunkey. He would never have selected her is she were capable of a public display of independent thought. Look at the utter clowns and liars that comprise the Demcratic portion of the Town Council. All of them put together cannot tie their shoes unless Ellenport allows it. Cislo cares about only two people; Ellenport and herself. No self respecting individual would ever align themselves with Ellenport...The King of Dishonesty.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Cislo
< Date: 20-Sep-99 >

The only suprises will be before the election when Cislo makes her empty campaign promises. After the election those promises will be broken because Ellenport will see to it and she will do whatever Ellenport wants, no matter how it hurts the citizens.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Lenny
< Date: 21-Sep-99 >

Cislo was hand picked by Ellenport and this tells us a lot about her, none of it good.

Ellenport F'ed Up the parking situation at the Municipal Building and he F'ed Up Picton Park. He's personal life is in shambles.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Not Nevargic
< Date: 21-Sep-99 >

Mr. Nevargic came to my door campaigning and all I can say is that he was arrogant. He definitely has that cop mentality and when I disagreed with a comment he made he got defensive and gave me the impression of how dare me disagree with him. No matter how much I dislike Ellenport I don't feel that putting another arrogant person on council is going to help. I will be supporting Cislo.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Not Cislo
< Date: 21-Sep-99 >

hey - Michelle Cislo came to my door, and she couldn't answer a single question I had. She couldn't even say whether she generally believes Ellenport. She defintely has that PTA "Can't we all just get along?" mentality.

No Michelle, we can't all just get along, and I want someone who will put the second ward's interests ahead of Bob Ellenport's interests. I'd rather have someone with your personality on council than Pete Nevargic, but until I know that you will be your own person, I'll have to vote for Nevargic.

Like my fellow Democrats in New York City who support Rudy Guiliani, I'd rather have an arrogant person on council than an ignorant puppet like Cislo.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Let's have a Debate
< Date: 21-Sep-99 >

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >SECOND WARD VOTER
< Date: 22-Sep-99 >

Mrs. Cislo again displayed her proclivity for "Rubber Stamp" politics at last night's Council meeting when she, along with her Democrat partners voted to accept the appointments of 7 Special Police Officers, 6 of which are non-residents. The hiring of these "out-of-towners" was orchestrated by Bob Ellenport and Chief Danco to hire some "friends" of the Chief. When the Mayor was asked by Councilman Bonaccorso if the need for Specials was advertised to the residents of Clark first, he responded, "Ask the Chief." When the Chief was ask he responded, "Ask my Lieutenant." What it came down to is; it was never made known to the residents of Clark that there was a need to hire for this position or Police Dispatcher for that matter. (Two Police Dispatchers were hired over the past months, one, a non-resident.) Councilman Bonaccorso and Councilwomen Memmber cast a "Abstain" vote in protest to the manner in which Clark jobs were not offered to Clark residents before seeking applicants from out of town. As Sal put it; "You would never see a Clark kid hired by any other town as a Special Police Officer." What is Chief Danco trying to prove? Ms. Cislo nor any other Democrat on council said one word in defence of Clark residents.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To Second Ward Voter
< Date: 22-Sep-99 >

This is such typical nonsense. Stuff like this only seems to happen in Clark. All 5 Democrats on council and Ellenport should be ashamed.

The fact that Ellenport and Danco passed the buck like that is horrible. An explanation was deserved.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To second ward voter
< Date: 22-Sep-99 >

.....an explanation was deserved.... It would seem that in Clark we GET what we deserve. Look who we voted for as mayor.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Are you kidding
< Date: 23-Sep-99 >

This must be a joke. After we buckled under to the NAACP and the Mayor sold out the kids of our town from ever becoming a Clark policeman (unless the are veterans and finish on top of the list) we now hand jobs that are not subject to the agreement to OUT OF TOWNERS. What in the world can these Democrats be thinking? The time has come to add common sense to our government and support the township residents (taxpayers) first. Vote for Nevargic and not the rubber stamp government we have now!!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Disgusted
< Date: 23-Sep-99 >

The Democrats should be run out of town for this one. Not even advertising to township residents. I guess the special police are another political appointment and friends in other towns come before township taxpayers.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >No respect for the taxpayer
< Date: 23-Sep-99 >

Why cant my kid get on the Special Police? Oh his name is not Mazarella or a friend of the chief. Did anyone question how much we spend on sending special to school, It seems like we are always putting on new ones? It is time we get rid of the Police Chief and the Mayor for this.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >I want to see
< Date: 23-Sep-99 >

the mayor justify these hirings.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >What Justification
< Date: 23-Sep-99 >

The Mayor and Council has every right to appoint whom ever they want, in town or out of town, so this is not an issue.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >TO ABOVE POST
< Date: 23-Sep-99 >

WOULD IT BE AN ISSUE IF YOUR SON OR DAUGHTER HAD THE DESIRE TO GET INTO LAW ENFORCEMENT, OR IF THEY JUST NEEDED A JOB?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 23-Sep-99 >

Is there a law against it not that I know of, so then I stick to my statment this is not an issue.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >John K
< Date: 23-Sep-99 >

Again. It all boils down to doing what's best for the township and its residents.

Yes, no laws were broken. But this is, once again, a slap in the face to the residents that pay the taxes. Occurances like this have been much to frequent since the new council took over in January.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >That is the point
< Date: 23-Sep-99 >

To the victors go the spoils

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >REMENBER THAT ON NOV 2
< Date: 24-Sep-99 >

nevargic all ther way.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >!!!!!
< Date: 25-Sep-99 >

once a bag-man always a bag-man

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >ATTENTION PICTON PARK AND DAWN DRIVE
< Date: 26-Sep-99 >

ATTENTION PICTON PARK AND DAWN DRIVE RESIDENTS!!!!!!!!! GET OUT THE VOTE IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD TO DEFEAT MICHELLE CISLO IN THE NOVEMBER ELECTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SEND THE DEMOCRATS A MESSAGE WALK TO EVERY HOUSE IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND LET THE OTHER RESIDENTS KNOW THAT YOU RESIDE IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD AND TELL THEM ABOUT WHAT THE DEMOCRATS HAVE DONE TO YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GET OUT THE VOTE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Athene Cislo in Clark
< Date: 26-Sep-99 >

or Clinton in New York the message and the method are the same.

The people in NY do NOT want the female first felon. Party bosses do not care who the people want. So the supply of carrots to get out the vote for Clinton will be endless. How else would Dems convince voters to support an unqualified candidate ?

Clark doesn't have as many carrots to give away .. yet. It will take more than the Picton carrot to elect Cislo . As another mayoral echo, Cislo will have to hand out more and better carrots to get elected.

Clark voters might hold out for something better in the way of a carrot . An independent minded representative with principles would be a tempting carrot .

Credit for bringing a couple of swings to a playground falls far too short to qualify as a carrot.

What worthwhile carrots (that we can all benefit from) is the mayor willing to give the voters to get Sislo elected ?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >On Cislo
< Date: 26-Sep-99 >

Cislo, was handing out water in the apartments, why the apartments and not to the whole town? Also, Cislo was at my door she was introduced to me by the Mayor, who then proceeded to answer my questions regarding, why she is supporting LOSAP. Why can't she answer for herself? I think that she is a fine example of what the mayor wants. Looks, has friends and no brains

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Senior
< Date: 27-Sep-99 >

I am a Senior Citizen who had to send a neighbor to get me water during the emergency. Wh didn't Cislo deliver mine?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Cislo Supporter
< Date: 27-Sep-99 >

I am supporting her because she brought water to my elderly mother. I really don't care who paid for the water or if nobody else got any water. That's not my business.

Also, I like Mayor Ellenport and I believe he a very honest man and a very good lawyer. Anybody who will do whatever Mayor Ellenport wants has my vote.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Democrats rule
< Date: 27-Sep-99 >

dems got Picton Park a playground and a fence. dems are best. vote republican and see how much help you get from the county or the state when McGreevey becomes gov.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 27-Sep-99 >

Carmine I see Hooked on Phonics is working I see such improvement with your last post Democrats rule.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >On Carmine
< Date: 27-Sep-99 >

Can anyone confirm that Carmine Giordano left the American Legion because he felt the legion was a republican organization? If this is true it real slap in the face to all that served in the US military. The American Legion is not a Republican or Democrat organization it is a fraternal organization to help all that served in the military.

Carmine and the Democrats really went off the deep end this time.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >I heard the same thing
< Date: 27-Sep-99 >

It is scary when a politician can not separate reality from paranoia

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 27-Sep-99 >

The American Legion Mission Statement: I don's see any mention of republicans The American Legion was chartered by Congress in 1919 as a patriotic, mutual-help, war-time veterans organization. A community-service organization which now numbers nearly 3 million members -- men and women -- in nearly 15,000 American Legion Posts worldwide.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Giordano...
< Date: 27-Sep-99 >

is an idiot, and this latest move proves it - once again

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >The "Ape Man"
< Date: 27-Sep-99 >

Grrrr. I'll get you 'Pulicans!

Grrrr. Ya betta stop pikin' on da mayor!

I'm gonna ask Bob to rite another ledder-to-da-editor for me to sine!

Grrrr....

C.G.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >The Previous post
< Date: 28-Sep-99 >

Is one of the funniest I've ever seen!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Not as funny, though...
< Date: 28-Sep-99 >

...as watching our Public Works director try to put a sentence together.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >So Sorry
< Date: 28-Sep-99 >

Its really ashame you people have nothing better to do then lowerself and make fun of other people. How old are we?I'm very sorry that yourself esteem is so low that you have to make fun of other people to make yourself feel better,its such a pity that you weren't brought up better than that.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >So Sorry
< Date: 28-Sep-99 >

Its really ashame you people have nothing better to do then lowerself and make fun of other people. How old are we?I'm very sorry that yourself esteem is so low that you have to make fun of other people to make yourself feel better,its such a pity that you weren't brought up better than that. Elizabeth

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Laura to Elizabeth The pity is
< Date: 28-Sep-99 >

that some of our elected officials WEREN'T brought up to have RESPECT and REGARD for taxpayers. OUR self esteem is intact. Otherwise we would not be taking offense at the treatment we receive from those same people you are so concerned about. I don't know how old you are but I'm old enough to know when my intelligence is insulted and my senior neighbors are denied the respect to which they are entitled. Direct your post to the next town meeting.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >An observer come to think of it
< Date: 28-Sep-99 >

I do see Ms. Cislo as a water carrier .

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >???
< Date: 28-Sep-99 >

Are Nevargic and Cislo going to debate?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Yeah, debate this...
< Date: 28-Sep-99 >

Whether the Dem Chairman is the "missing link" in the evolutionary chain...

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >About Cislo
< Date: 28-Sep-99 >

Cislo is not just a water carrier. She is the youngest and newest Ellenport shit picker. The goal is to get every Ellenport supporter out of office and elect normal people to those positions.

As for Carmine, it is a plus that he left the American Legion. He is a moron who certainly coud never add anything positive to any organization. And as for Ellenport being a good lawyer, isn't he being disbarred? The only legal work he has done in a long time is to dodge the Federal Probe and to worm his way out of bankruptcy.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Vote
< Date: 29-Sep-99 >

I for one am sitting this one out. I think Bill Caruso should run.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >YEAH Carurso
< Date: 29-Sep-99 >

Caruso could not be elected Dog Dropping Picker Upper

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 29-Sep-99 >

At least Bill won a 2nd Ward election.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 30-Sep-99 >

CORRECTION:

At least Bill won THREE 2nd Ward elections.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Forget Caruso
< Date: 30-Sep-99 >

Bill was a councilperson years ago. I have yet seen any postings on why I should vote for Cislo or Nevargic other then Cislo is not Nevargic and Nevargic is not Cislo.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >a 2nd ward resident
< Date: 30-Sep-99 >

Political signs already?????? I have been seeing some Cislo signs for the past week. Aren't we starting things a WEE bit early this year?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Forget the Signs
< Date: 30-Sep-99 >

What are their positions.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Positions:
< Date: 30-Sep-99 >

Cislo favors whatever bob ellenpport tells her to favor. Cislo opposes whatever bob ellenport tells her to oppose.

Nevargic favors whatever second ward residents favor. Nevargic opposes whatever second ward residents oppose.

See how simple it is?

If you live in the second ward and want your voice heard on council, vote for Nevargic.

If you live in the second ward and want another Ellenport voice on the council, vote for Cislo.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >ABOUT CARUSO
< Date: 30-Sep-99 >

Why are you picking on this guy? He is retired. He was a good councilmen and never lost an election.

I know if he ran today he would beat both candidates in this race by at least 500 votes, just like he did in his last three elections.

Tell me something, do you really call this boring campaign a race?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >ELECTION SIGNS
< Date: 30-Sep-99 >

Hey you know what signs don't vote people do. people who are not regested to vote have signs on the lawn .

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >we can't wait
< Date: 30-Sep-99 >

Hey mayor ellenport bring Cislo with you to dawn drive see what she gets their?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >a 2nd Ward resident
< Date: 30-Sep-99 >

Bill --

If you really think you can win by 500 votes, why don't you go for it instead of talking about it?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >clark
< Date: 01-Oct-99 >

he is in forced retirement. he knew he pissed off alot of people. so instead of running and knowing there is no chance. yes bill, not even a close second for dog poopie scooper. so bill is pete's mentor now. whatever pete been writing and saying comes from the big bull except his boa legal speeches that come from JH. lets be realistic here. A "has been" mentor and a two time loser canidate without a piss chance in hell, cislo has got it in the bag, hands down.how many times do you plan to walk the ward this time? it seems 2&half times didn't do it last time. maybe your thinking if you throw even poop at the wall some may stick, now if you had pitta as a target on the wall yes the sh@@@#$ will stick really good. but the voters can use a simple garden hose to wash you and the poop away.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >TO CLARK
< Date: 01-Oct-99 >

Pete will win this race so stop crying you jerk off.

THE HAS BEEN MENTOR!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Old Ghost
< Date: 01-Oct-99 >

Just when you thought it was safe to swim in Clark's political waters, it looks like the professional shark is back. That old ghost (aka "the RAT") who was thrown out of Clark politics for various evil activities.

He hates all Republicans, and he especially hates the former second ward councilman and council president.

Hate hate hate. He has let his venom get the best of him on the past, and he's doing it once again.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >"Prediction"
< Date: 01-Oct-99 >

I predict that there will be a low turnout and as usual the Democrats will come out and the Republicans will lose again by less than 20 votes. So get out and support Nevargic.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Candidate by Edict?
< Date: 01-Oct-99 >

Is there a Dem out there with enough guts and/or influence to tell Cislo that it is presumptious of her to run ? Is her candidacy by imperial (mayoral) edict ? There must be a Dem with a few principles that could challenge her. She has received too much attention on these threads. PLEASE, let us hear from the real Dems NOT from the ellenpuppets.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 01-Oct-99 >

lets hear it from the real rep's and not from the bonocaruso strung-out puppets!!!!!!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Observer
< Date: 01-Oct-99 >

I think we have a Kuchar on this site. I can smell it in the last posting.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >THE OLD WASHED UP REPS REFUSE TO GIVE UP.
< Date: 01-Oct-99 >

hey you old bags get lost.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To the jerk…
< Date: 01-Oct-99 >

Who keeps attacking me, Bill Caruso, and Pete Nevargic:

I have little doubt you are none other than that outcast, that frustrated, wannabe-but-can't-make-the-grade-as-a-real-cop jackass, better known on these threads as Murray the Cop, a/k/a the sucker-puncher:

What's this deep need you have to continually make an ass out of yourself? Why don't you just sign yourself in to some Rest Home? Your puny attempts to embarrass me and the others whom you cowardly attack in unsigned posts all backfire, and the only one you wind up embarrassing is yourself.
If you had the slightest bit of intelligence, you would have figured that out for yourself long ago.
The best part of you must have run down your father's leg.

Roy

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To the jerk…
< Date: 01-Oct-99 >

Who keeps attacking me, Bill Caruso, and Pete Nevargic:

I have little doubt you are none other than that outcast, that frustrated, wannabe-but-can't-make-the-grade-as-a-real-cop jackass, better known on these threads as Murray the Cop, a/k/a the sucker-puncher:

What's this deep need you have to continually make an ass out of yourself? Why don't you just sign yourself in to some Rest Home? Your puny attempts to embarrass me and the others whom you cowardly attack in unsigned posts all backfire, and the only one you wind up embarrassing is yourself.
If you had the slightest bit of intelligence, you would have figured that out for yourself long ago.
The best part of you must have run down your father's leg.

Roy

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >As for Nevargic...
< Date: 02-Oct-99 >

I happen to know that Pete is running his OWN campaign, that Bill Caruso is NOT involved in Pete's campaign beyond lending his vocal and written support for Pete. The local GOP is NOT "run" by any one person, as it used to be before Nelson Kornstein was stripped of his power in the local party; the same cannot be said for the democrats presently holding office, who all kowtow to Ellenport...even - or should I say especially? - the nominal "leader" of the Democratic Party, Carmine Giordano, who is nothing but a figurehead, and Ellenport's longest-running puppet act.

Roy

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Giordano in not a Figurehead
< Date: 02-Oct-99 >

He is a Pet Monkey

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 02-Oct-99 >

I found Carmen's web site http://www.monkey-island.demon.co.uk/

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Amy Not only do Clark dems
< Date: 02-Oct-99 >

robot speak the 'same old same old' but they also COPY any intelligent idea . EllenPUPPET rolls off the tongue but Bonacurso strung out-- give us a break. Paid Dem writers should be able to do better than the junk they post. Most of us on these threads are ordinary taxpayers and we don't resort to copycat postings. Is the jerk who posted that an example of a real Clark Dem ?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >clark
< Date: 02-Oct-99 >

it seems the bonacurso puppets can't take the heat. and roy has to do their bidding. and if roy is the best they have,well looks like we all have to walk around with hip boots. listen if you want to dish it out, you better be able to take it too!!!!!!!and the ordinary taxpayers you mention are the same five over and over again signing different names Big deal.you contiune to spread the lies and the name calling. you people are so demented, you beleive the lies you spread to a point that you would trip over the truth and wouldn't even realize it.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Wrong again
< Date: 03-Oct-99 >

There are alot more then 5 people writing on these threads. You might be suprised on election day like the last elections.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >SOS SOS SOS
< Date: 03-Oct-99 >

MR NARVARGIC, WE NEED YOU HELP NOW. STOP THE BIDDING FOR THE PAVING OF THE PARKING LOT BEHIND OUR HOMES, TELL YOUR BUDDYS ON COUNCIL TO TABLE IT UNTILL THE SCHOOL BOARD MEETS ANS DEBATES THIS OR GIVES ITS APPROVAL DON'T LET US DOWN NOW.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >clark
< Date: 03-Oct-99 >

I do remember the last election, navargic lost!!!!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Hey Ms. Cislo!
< Date: 03-Oct-99 >

Remember your vote to hire non-residents for the position of Special Police Officers and not Clark residents? Well your friends down at the County that suddenly found $15,000 for you and the Mayor, have just decided that; County jobs paid for with County taxes should should only go to County residents, (Union section of the Sunday Star-Ledger,page 47, October 3, 1999). Even if you know only what Mayor Ellenport tells you just before each Council meeting, you should try reading the papers sometime, you might come in contact with the TRUTH.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Louie T
< Date: 03-Oct-99 >

Cislo accepts phony praise for helping the Picton Park residents. Ellenport and Nozza screwed the residents, Nozza was forced out, and Ellenport used his political connections to make Cislo appear as the heroine of Picton Park. Why did Ellenport screw the residents in the first place?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Amy To Clark (parrot) with thanks to Louie
< Date: 03-Oct-99 >

for the evidence...now about that 'original' phrase of yours the BONACURSO PUPPETS ! WHOSE puppets ? WHAT truth ? PARROT ?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Ann T Byrd question to Clark Parrot
< Date: 03-Oct-99 >

How come the only 'facts' you come up with are denials of what is public knowledge that can be read in any newspaper ? Five people ? You can count that high ? Unusual parrot. Unusual puppet .

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >More Then 5 People
< Date: 03-Oct-99 >

I was referring to the Board of Education Election where Axelrad had to withdraw from the election. Peare lost and Aklonis won by a few votes. That was after this site was formed.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To Louie T
< Date: 03-Oct-99 >

What do you think Nozza is thinking right now? Ellenport has made him look like a fool. In reality, Nozza was a fool for having supported our bankrupt Mayor, but it's always good to have confirmation.

Anyone associated with Ellenport will have their political career go in the toilet. Nozza is dead already, Kuchar is right behind, and the others were worthless to start with.

Their lack of respect for the residents that they represent has completely turned me off to them. They serve as Council to the Mayor and not the people.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To above poster
< Date: 03-Oct-99 >

Instead of calling the meetings PUBLIC COUNCIL MEETINGS, they should be renamed to ELLENPORT COUNCIL MEETINGS.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To Tats Wright
< Date: 07-Oct-99 >

If Nevargik is sooo "well spooken" and "a grate debaiter" just like you >>>>>

FURGET ABOUT UT>>>>>>>

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To Observer (Oct 1 post)
< Date: 07-Oct-99 >

No, that smell is not Kuchar… the stench is far more offensive than Kuchar's. It's that disgruntled can't-make-the-grade-as-a-cop Wald, hiding behind the anonymity these threads offer as he casts stones at those who saw him for what he is, and banished him from their midst.

As for the posts by "clark" (Oct 2 & 3)...they have the same stench. Wald's favorite pastime has become Roy-bashing. He. like Ellenport and the other Ellenport puppets, hates the truth.

Roy Pitta

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 07-Oct-99 >

bash this roy!!!!!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >ELECTION POOL
< Date: 07-Oct-99 >

Results ON NOV 2 1999

Pete Nevargic 498 votes Michelle Cislo 460 thats if theirs a low voter turnout?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Great retort!
< Date: 07-Oct-99 >

Great retort, Dave...LOL

Roy

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >'A' student at Harvard to Tats Right
< Date: 08-Oct-99 >

kant yu dems evin KOPY nuthin ryte ? nun a yez got yer own idears? yez ain't evin gud parrits ! maybe yez ar gud puppits but yez dint cum up wit nuttin new. stop kopyin !!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To Cislo
< Date: 08-Oct-99 >

Dear Ms. Cislo? Where are you? Now that you are finished taking all the credit that you do not deserve for Picton Park because Mayor Ellenport wrote out the whole play beforehand, maybe you can do something to help out your Dawn Drive constituents. You are well aware that they have to view an illegal parking lot from their back windows.

It's a little to late for you to help Dawn Drive. You let way too much time pass without lending your expert skills to mediate the problem. You could have been a tremendous success. Since, you were so able to secure funding for Picton Park from Union County with such amazing ease, imagine how much success you would have had convincing Ellenport and Timoni that parking lots just do not belong behind peoples' homes.

Your lack of assistance to Dawn Drive proves that you are a fake, a phoney and a big fraud. The only time you do anything is when Ellenport snaps his fingers and you walk onto a staged where he has already orchestrated everythig. People like you are no better than Marie Soyka. You have proven that you will never act independently of Ellenport.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Lets get to the point
< Date: 09-Oct-99 >

Before we vote we all should know where they stand on all the issues in the ward. What about the traffic problems? The Day time medical coverage. Monthly cleanups. lower taxes less wastful spending on things we can due without What about it. Mr.Navargic Mrs Cislo we can't wait to hear from you . the voters.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Why Address the issues?
< Date: 09-Oct-99 >

Why address the issues? When you can smile and get yourself through the election. But don't worry as every other year get ready for the propaganda mailings from both parties. O should I say Ellenport for Cislo and Bonacorso and Caruso for Nevagic. Because I think this election is about voting for the less of the two evils.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To Cislo
< Date: 09-Oct-99 >

Ms Cislo, can you explain how the Democrats can now spend over $80,000.00 to pave the field behind Dawn Drive? Isn't that a lot of money to spend just to ruin the lives of your constituents who have to view that parking lot. Ellenport can bulldoze those homes down for free. The parking lot they have had to tolerate for over five years has had the same impact upon those people as if he tore their homes down brick by brick.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >About the Clark Democrats
< Date: 09-Oct-99 >

The movie "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" really portrays the mentality of Ellenport's Democrats. During the film, an alien power takes over the minds and bodies of an entire town while the residents sleep. The people look the same after the alien force overwhelms them but their minds are gone. The force prevents them from being capable of thinking for themselves, having any feelings or emotion and they become a pack of empty headed drones. You will find this type of behavior deeply endowed in the Democrats on Council. They just stare blankly at their leader and wait for their marching orders. There is no hope except getting these drones out of office and ending the corruption in Ellenport's dishonest Democratic rubber stamp Council.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >JUST PASSING BY
< Date: 10-Oct-99 >

HOW RIGHT YOU ARE .

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >taxpayer
< Date: 10-Oct-99 >

Ellenport said F. T. J. WOULD NOT COST US ANYTHING 80,000 FOR PARKING LOT NO ONE NEEDS ? NAVARGIC NOV 2. GET OUT AND VOTE.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Thats it.
< Date: 10-Oct-99 >

THAT OLD FAT COP FROM DAWN DRIVE HAS MY VOTE.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Thats it.
< Date: 10-Oct-99 >

THAT OLD FAT COP FROM DAWN DRIVE HAS MY VOTE.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >dwbate
< Date: 10-Oct-99 >

Mr Nevargic and Mrs Cislo both monitor these threads. So please let us know if you two will debate!!!!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >flat foot
< Date: 10-Oct-99 >

thank you verrry much, you crazy bastards.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Hey flat foot the ONLY
< Date: 11-Oct-99 >

Crazy bastards are the ones spending $80,000 of OUR money on an unwanted useless parking lot. Only CRAZIER are the ones who vote for them to do it !

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To above
< Date: 11-Oct-99 >

You are so right. That amount of money whether it is $80,000.00 or if Ellenport manages to have it done for less is our tax money that Ellenport is using for a parking lot for a very lazy, very few. If Ellenport does complete the project for under $80,000,00 it will be built without a berm which would shield the residents. This is the kind of sick and demented person Ellenport is. He will build that parking lot anyway he can, no matter how it harms the residents. Just look at what he has Dawn Drive living wth already. The current situation and Ellenport himself are disgraces. And Cislo marches right along with Ellenport in his efforts to ruin a neighborhood. Yet, she and Ellenport have the nerve to claim that Cislo is a decent person who will serve her constituents well. What a joke. All she does is pretend that the Dawn Drive problem does not exist. We do not need another Ellenport kiss ass on Council.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Screw the berm
< Date: 12-Oct-99 >

put the lot in the front. Comon already.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >I guess
< Date: 12-Oct-99 >

Neither of the candidates have the guts to Debate. The residents should be "DEMANDING A DEBATE" other wise the election will be just a popularity contest.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Why would they debate
< Date: 12-Oct-99 >

neither of the candidates are worthy of my vote and I will watching TV on November 2nd.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Clark elections ARE popularity contests.
< Date: 12-Oct-99 >

This is a no-brainer. How the hell would a moron like Marty Ferrara win a seat on the town council if Clark elections were more than popularity contests?

Ellenport likes his council candidates to be as popular and dumb as possible. Look at Ferrara, Kazanowski, Kuchar and Soyka. Their easily electable and easily controlable. Cislo is just his latest tool.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >So why not debate
< Date: 12-Oct-99 >

If the election is a popularity contest then why in the world would Nevargic not debate. If he could expose Cislo as a brain less drone why would he be so afraid?.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >??
< Date: 12-Oct-99 >

When was the last Council candidate debate in Clark?

Has it ever happened?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Charles Ramshaw
< Date: 12-Oct-99 >

Devine Madness

Someone showed me an article from this week’s Clark Patriot. On the cover was an article titled "Cislo, Freeholders Did The Right Thing For Picton Families." Well, maybe the author of this article truly believes that Cislo was directly responsible for getting Picton Park additional money for the Park and fence. That’s fine; I just happen to think differently.

But how can the Patriot go out and slam Councilman Bonaccorso in the manner that they did. Councilman Bonaccorso and Councilwoman Memmer were the only members of Council that voted for the safety fence at Picton Park back in February. It was Ellenport’s Democrats that turned their backs on these residents.

One more item on the Patriot – Why do Clark Patriot articles have no authors attached to them? People criticize the Local Source threads because most people post anonymously; isn’t the Patriot doing the same thing? Maybe Ellenport wrote this lead story, or maybe it was Cislo. The Patriot is purposely trying to fool Clark residents.

Page three of this rag tells us that James J. Devine is the publisher of the Patriot. Anyone want to bet that he and Ellenport are great friends?

Charles Ramshaw

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Cislo's Campaign Slogan
< Date: 13-Oct-99 >

"Putting Ellenport First"

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >YOU GOT IT RIGHT
< Date: 13-Oct-99 >

JAMES J DEVINE IS A DEM LAP DOG. THAT PAPER IS TO SUPPORT THE DEMS AROUND ELECTION TIME DON'T BUY IT. HINT WHAT DEM SEN. FROM ELIZ, IS THE REAL OWNER OF THAT RAG. Mr. L.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Clark
< Date: 13-Oct-99 >

the same the for eagle REP LAP DOG, asswipes

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Cislo is a piece of work
< Date: 13-Oct-99 >

How anyone can support Cislo is beyond imagination. Just observe her during Council Meetings. She cannot string two words together and she is constantly looking at Ellenport for help. Cislo had the nerve to distribute her campaign propaganda in the doors of the homes on Dawn Drive. How does she even dare to solicit votes from Dawn Drive homeowners when she is helping Ellenport to harass those residents with an illegal and tormenting parking lot? Cislo is now a major player in continuing the Dawn Drive problem. She never once spoke to any of those residents and she never once attempted to intervene on their behalfs.

There is absolutely no reason for CIslo to debate Pete Nevargic. Her refusal to even request that Ellenport relocate the parking lot away from her constituents' homes proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that she is nothing but a shill for Ellenport. Cislo has not put forth an ounce of support for Dawn Drive. She never wasted her time visiting Dawn Drive before, yet she managed to waste her time distributing her propaganda to people on a street that would never vote for her simply because she is aiding and abetting Ellenport's scandal at Dawn Drive. Cislo does not deserve to be elected because she is helping Ellenport continue to hurt Dawn Drive.

As for the Patriot, I had to laugh when they wrote that Cislo is a candidate who cares about families. Sure, she cares about the families that Ellenport tells her to care about. As for Dawn Drive, Ellenport wishes those families would go hang.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Cislo is a piece of work
< Date: 13-Oct-99 >

How anyone can support Cislo is beyond imagination. Just observe her during Council Meetings. She cannot string two words together and she is constantly looking at Ellenport for help. Cislo had the nerve to distribute her campaign propaganda in the doors of the homes on Dawn Drive. How does she even dare to solicit votes from Dawn Drive homeowners when she is helping Ellenport to harass those residents with an illegal and tormenting parking lot? Cislo is now a major player in continuing the Dawn Drive problem. She never once spoke to any of those residents and she never once attempted to intervene on their behalfs.

There is absolutely no reason for CIslo to debate Pete Nevargic. Her refusal to even request that Ellenport relocate the parking lot away from her constituents' homes proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that she is nothing but a shill for Ellenport. Cislo has not put forth an ounce of support for Dawn Drive. She never wasted her time visiting Dawn Drive before, yet she managed to waste her time distributing her propaganda to people on a street that would never vote for her simply because she is aiding and abetting Ellenport's scandal at Dawn Drive. Cislo does not deserve to be elected because she is helping Ellenport continue to hurt Dawn Drive.

As for the Patriot, I had to laugh when they wrote that Cislo is a candidate who cares about families. Sure, she cares about the families that Ellenport tells her to care about. As for Dawn Drive, Ellenport wishes those families would go hang.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To above post
< Date: 13-Oct-99 >

Once again I say "Putting Ellenport First." This is what Cislo is all about.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >to : to above post
< Date: 13-Oct-99 >

Vote for Cislo and we can have Clarks answer to the Spice Girls up there on coucil. Cislo, and Soyka .

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >A VERY DISGUSTED TAXPAYER
< Date: 14-Oct-99 >

I just read a featured article in today's Clark Eagle, that must have made many taxpayer disgusted.

The article stated that 2nd Ward Councilwoman Michele Cislo's campaign spent $14,075. on a fund raiser, (the Mayor's political Democratic golf outing in Colonia) which resulted with only $3,000. net income.

Any fool can see, that it would be more intelligent to NOT sponsor a money losing golf outing... and KEEP THE $l4,075. DONATIONS RECEIVED......

Is this a classic example of how the Mayor's controlled Golf Commission plans to run the new HYATT HILLS GOLF COURSE??????

IF SO...GOD HELP US TAXPAYERS, WITH THIS TYPE OF IRRESPONSIBLE LEADERSHIP.......

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Another disgusted taxpayer
< Date: 14-Oct-99 >

And the mayor made a comment that he'll continue to run the golf outing as long as it continues to make money???? No wonder his personal finances are in the state they're in -- someone SPENDS $14,000 to EARN $3,000 and that's MAKING MONEY? Not in the school I went to.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Spice Girls???
< Date: 15-Oct-99 >

There are five Spice Girls, not just two…does this mean Kuchar, Giordano, and Ellenport would attend Council meetings in drag to complete the group? They could be Cranky Spice, Nasty Spice, and Evil Spice…while Cislo and Soyka could be Lovely Spice and Useless Spice.

Roy

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Let's Rock and Roll
< Date: 15-Oct-99 >

The signs are out. The propaganda is in out mailboxes. Let's get it on!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Who Cares
< Date: 15-Oct-99 >

This has got to be the most boring election known to man kind, two inadequate candidates and no issues. All I have seen so far is the democrats are ellenport puppets, vote for tax increases and don't care about the Dawn Drive residents. The Republicans are Caruso puppets, are hiding $1,500 in expenses and they care about Picton Park. What issues to run on! excuse me as I yawn, we need real candidates that will do what is right, no matter what party they belong to and will deal with the issues. The only good thing is that this will all be over in 2 weeks and 4 days.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To who cares
< Date: 15-Oct-99 >

I couldn't agree with you more. Let's get some real candidates and get to the real issues, not all this fluff.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To who cares
< Date: 15-Oct-99 >

I agree! I could care less about a report that was filed, I could just imagine what is missing on both sides. I did not see the report but I can imagine what the bureaucratic for is like, it is most likely worse then a tax form. I am tired of the whole Dawn Drive and the Picton he said she said and lets not forget they all care for the people. If they really care they would stop being baby's and run the town.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >to all three who cares
< Date: 15-Oct-99 >

we have all heard of dual personalities but you are a trio. One person having a three sided conversation alone. Imagine, all three agree. Three bores = one person.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Clare re the who cares 'trio'
< Date: 15-Oct-99 >

Just because YOU enjoy talking to yourself doesn't mean that we enjoy reading your imaginary conversations with your imaginary friends. Its like listening to one of the three stooges imitating the other two. After you get help for the multiple personality disorder, you should vote. Early and OFTEN. ---Preferably in Elizabeth or Chicago, any place outside of Clark.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >No Contest
< Date: 16-Oct-99 >

Cislo was appointed by Ellenport soley because she would be a good puppet. Nevargic is his own man. Contrary to what some have have written, Nevargic is his own man and he fights for what his constituants desire. Cislo does what Ellenport wants. Like Nozza before her, she has already chosen Ellenport's desires over the taxpayers that she represents. It's really a shame, but it makes the decision of who to vote for much easier.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To Who Cares
< Date: 16-Oct-99 >

It is very sad that you are tired of the Dawn Drive problem. Imagine how damm tired the residents who have to live there are of the problem. Dawn Drive is not "a he said,she said issue." but rather a perfect example of a very corrupt and diabolical mayor who gets away with doing anything he pleases because he has political friends in the right places. You should be so tired of the Dawn Drive problem that you realize that it is truly a major political issue initiated by a mayor who does not care about how he harms residents. Dawn Drive is a perfect reason to cast your vote AGAINST Cislo because her refusal to stand up to Ellenport in order to help the residents in her ward proves that she is nothing but a spineless Ellenport flunkey. Do not give Cislo any credit for Picton Park because Ellenport staged the whole thing to make her look good. If the Republicans were in control on Council and were appealing to the Freeholders for funding, you ca be certain that the Freeholders would have been ordered by Ellenport to not give Picton Park a penny of funding. Sal Bonnacorso could have banged his head on the illegal gravel parking lot at Town Hall and the Freeholders would have ignored him. Since you are so tired of Dawn Drive, ask Ellenport to either relocate or just forget about his useless parking lot. Look at how rapidly Ellenport secured funding for Picton Park. How amazing and what's even more astonishing is that it happened so close to election time. The fact that Cislo accepts this dishonest praise and that she plays along with the charade that she went to the Freeholders and managed to appeal to them is just revolting. Cislo is a bad as Soyka. Remember, a vote for Cislo is a wasted vote. If this Ellenport lap dog wins you will see even more corruption and rubber stamping. The goal is to take some of Ellenport's overwhelming power away. A vote for Nevargic will put power back into the hands of the people.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >But Cislo is so much prettier
< Date: 16-Oct-99 >

I'm voting for Cislo because she is prettier than Nevargic.

Cislo also has a nice smile. She's such a nice lady. What's so bad about only trying to please Ellenport?

Incidentally, I am an imbecile, and I assure you that there are others like me in the second ward who will vote for Cislo for the same reasons I will.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Picton Resident
< Date: 17-Oct-99 >

We are getting the word out to our neighbors about the careless manner in which we have been treated by Ellenport's Democrates. I suggest that the Dawn Drive residents do the same thing. We need a change very badly and Nevargic is our choice.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Attention Picton Park and Dawn Drive Residents
< Date: 17-Oct-99 >

It should be realized that Picton Park and Dawn Drive residents should make more then a concerted effort to tell their neighbors to vote for Nevargic. The other parts of 2nd ward are equally important. Friendly's area and Lexington Village are two key voting areas. Let the voters over in those areas know what kinds of things the democrats have done while they were in office. Nozza should be a prime example. He was their second ward councilman for a short time.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Not everybody has Internet
< Date: 17-Oct-99 >

access. A newspaper can only report the golf outing. Opinions posted regarding it, can only be read here, therefore many voters are wihout the additional input these threads provide. That's one reason why the Ellenport machine is able to continue like 'pac-man' destroying anything in its path.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Athene we can't be critical of
< Date: 17-Oct-99 >

Ms. Cislo for the wrong reasons. As a mother and an attractive professional,she outshines most of the voters in Clark and the women in her own social and community groups i.e. PTA et al. It's easy to see why the mayor appointed Ms. Cislo. We can't fault her for her attributes . We should try to look beyond them to find some potential for constituent service.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To Athene
< Date: 17-Oct-99 >

I have been asking for Cislo's accomplishments, you say she is an attractive professional and out shines most voters. Can you please fill me in on the details? thanks, Undecided

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 18-Oct-99 >

If Cislo out shines most of the voters in Clark, then why is she associating herself with Ellenport?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >????
< Date: 18-Oct-99 >

Does antone know if there is going to be a debate? If so where and when.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Keep Reading
< Date: 19-Oct-99 >

I disagree with the person who posted on these threads that said that alot of people don't have computers and will not read this information. In this day and age more people then not have computers. These threads made a difference in the board of education election back in April and can make a difference in this election in November. Keep reading.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >After the Election
< Date: 19-Oct-99 >

Promises Promises. The democrats always make empty promises before any election. Funding has been promised now for Picton Park. Senior Citizens were promised housing before the last election. If you look carefully at the democratic record before elections and go back into the local newspapers you will see a pattern. A few weeks before any election an empty promise is made and then after the election nothing is done about it. The empty promise for Picton Park funding will be taken away if Cislo should win the election. Vote for Nevargic. He will not make those empty promises because he cares about Clark.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To Clare
< Date: 19-Oct-99 >

I posted only one of the who cares and you are the one who should take you medication to reduce your schizophrenia or should I say Athnea or Amy?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Letter from Cislo
< Date: 19-Oct-99 >

I just received a letter in the mail from Cislo. Was it me or was it very short on specifics? I would like to know what shared services she is going to pursue and why is she so proud of Shoprite and Barnes and Noble since they are the cause of the horrendous traffic in Clark?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Athene re letter from Cislo
< Date: 19-Oct-99 >

Did Ms. Cislo have any direct involvement in B & N and Shoprite ? Are these accomplishments (some would consider them as such) due to her efforts? If so, that might help to explain her appointment to council by the mayor. Voter acceptance of her might depend in part on how many of her constituents appreciate Shoprite and B & N as important to their quality of life.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >I know who is posting
< Date: 19-Oct-99 >

I sent that letter to one person in town and I wanted to see if they responded online. Good try.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Who
< Date: 19-Oct-99 >

Who may I and they be?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >?????
< Date: 20-Oct-99 >

Is there going to be a debate?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Voters beware
< Date: 20-Oct-99 >

Ellenport and Cislo are putting out new lies about Navargic please don't be fooled again elect Navargic Nov 2.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 20-Oct-99 >

Caruso and Nevargic are putting out new lies about Cislo please don't be fooled elect Cislo Nov 2.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 21-Oct-99 >

All the republicans need to do in this election is tell all the facts about how the democrats have run this town into the ground. High taxes, how money is no object with spending such as bonds. How the democrats don't support the citizens and make their lives miserable. That alone should win this election for Nevargic.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >A reader to I know who is posting
< Date: 21-Oct-99 >

So what Sherlock ? Want a reward ? Have you APPREHENDED someone ? If your dopey discovery is worth anything put it where it will do you the most good.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Amy to to Clare
< Date: 21-Oct-99 >

I am myself, and I think Athene is a disillusioned unregenerate Dem who is somewhat naive. But why three echoes who are bored with the issues should bother to write about their boredom is strange. Your options are either don't vote or invent some new issues. Could we interest you in an impeachment vote? How about a vote on a huge tax increase ? Or how about a vote to get an intern program started in Clark? These threads are to discuss existing issues . Your boredom should have its own thread.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >About Sherlock
< Date: 21-Oct-99 >

So Sherlock knows one person that is posting on these threads. Getting a letter in the mail may tell you who this person is but what will that accomplish. Maybe you can try process of elimination and send mail pieces one by one and you still wouldn't know everybody that posts on these threads.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >These threads ...
< Date: 21-Oct-99 >

... are eating Ellenport alive. All he does, day and night, is wonder who started this all, and who is posting.

I say he should worry more about his financial situation.

Beano

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Charles Ramshaw
< Date: 23-Oct-99 >

In and Out. A Quick Hit.

I read Cislo's campaign article in the current issue of the Clark Eagle and I really can not believe that she did not mention the plight of the Dawn Drive homeowners. This has been one of the biggest problems in the second ward for close to six years now.

Her silence on this issue is most disturbing. It makes everything else that she said seem very superficial. It lets us all know that she will only do what Ellenport permits her to do, and this is not the type of person that we want on Council.

- Chuck

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Clare BUT She is the type of person
< Date: 23-Oct-99 >

that ELLENPORT wants on council. HALF of a ward representation on council is the same as representation by a HALF wit even though it is the administrations idea of duly elected democratic equity. Now,the 'orphan' HALF of the second ward can refuse to pay taxes. No taxation WITHOUT representation,that is if U.S. laws are still recognized in Clark. We have a shortage of shame in Clark these days. That's o.k. though. Its balanced out by our shortage in pride.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >LeRoy
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

I just wanted everyone to know that Mr. Nevargic should not be elected to Council. My reason is as follows: I live not too far away from him and have heard for myself how prejudice the man can be. Outside in the spring and summer all I have heard him say on more than one occasion is how much he hates us black folks. In fact to quote him I think the term used was actually how much he hates "Niggers". I am a part of a mixed racial family and I live in Clark. I like Clark and have lived here for some time now. I dont have anything nice to say about him and he does not impress me as the type of person I would want serving on Council. Clark has done right by me and I hope it will continue to do the right thing and that is why I ask that you don't support Pete Nevargic for Council.

I guess working for many years as a Newark cop had an influence on his judgement. We don't need that type of mentality on Council!!

Thanks for your consideration.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >ralph
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

TO ABOVE TREAD MR. LEROY, OR IS IT Mr. WALD OR MR, Ellenport MR. NEVARGIC DID NOT STOP Mrs. Brown from being a black cop in clark, Mr. ELLENPORT DID. AND IT COST YOU HUNDEREDS OF THOUSANDS OF TAX DOLLORS

A New black resident in clark. LETS GIVE PETE A CHANCE.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Mr,Reason
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

On Nov 2 its more,

ELLENPORT POWER, OR A NEW HONEST VOICE ON COUNCIL? ITS UP TO YOU NOW.come out and vote on Nov 2

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >About Nevargic
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

I live by Mr. Nevargic and I have never heard him say one thing about anyone's race. The remark is just another sick shot by Ellenport supporter. None of you can offer anythng positive about Cislo and the Democrats so you try to hurt Mr. Nevargic with cheap verbal and written assaults. No one believes any of the Democrats so give up with the lies against Pete. The only things I have ever Pete say is how hard he would work to represent the people of his ward.The only thing I have seen Cislo do is work hard to represent Ellenport's agenda exclusively.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Cislo's propaganda
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

After reading the election piece that Ellenport wrote for that sweet and kind Michele Cislo in the Clark Eagle, it is obvious that we all have to vote for Pete Nevargic. The Democrats are running Clark right into the ground.

Cislo mentions a need for a traffic light at ShopRite. It never occurs to this drone that if Ellenport had never decided to put that huge store on such a busy street, we would not need a traffic light and we would not have to have police officers standing outside constantly to direct all of the traffic. This is all Ellenport's fault.

Another insight into Cislo's nature is her blatant refusal to help to end the tormenting parking lot behind Dawn Drive. Even if you live elsewhere in Clark and are not impacted by this awful and illegal parking lot, you must understand that it is wrong and Cislo is not saying a word to put an end to it because she is a faithful Elenport pawn who will never speak out against anything Ellenport wants. The residents on Dawn Drive are suffering and Cislo has never attempted to help them. How can any decent person support a mayor who is breaking the law and hurting residents and taxpayers? If Cislo is turning away from this very important issue because she refuse to incur Ellenport's wrath, she will always turn away from these types of issues and Ellenport will get whatever he wants despite the terrible impact it will have on people. We do not need another Democratic mummy on Council. We desperately need a strong willed person who will stand up to Ellenport when needed. We need a person who is not just going to say yes to anything Ellenport wants.

Cislo says she has empathy for others. Oh really? Where has she been during the past five years while Dawn Drive residents have pleaded for an end to the parking lot. Cislo never once stood up to Ellenport on behalf of those residents. If Cislo had the empathy she claims to have, she would have tried to help Dawn Drive but she continued to make things easy for her boss. Cislo's continued silence over Dawn Drive proves exactly the type of person she is and there is no amount of propaganda that can overcome the fact that she continued to allow Ellenport to trample over Dawn Drive residents while she represented them and while they pleaded for relief from that parking lot. You will probably see Cislo at Dawn Drive during the Halloween Parade. I hope she enjoys standing on the gravel. That will be the only time Cislo has ever been near Dawn Drive. I hope a resident questions her as to why she let the Dawn Drive residents just hang and continue to be victims to Ellenport. In Cislo's propaganda, Ellenport addressed the issue about votes being decided by a 5-2 majority. They deny this assertion and state that most votes have been 7-0. Where was Ms. Cislo when it came time to vote on seperating Fun Time Juction from the parking lot. Clearly, Cislo followed the orders given to her by Ellenport. She is just pathetic and her ward suffers because she will not think for herself.

Her propaganda asserts that she wants the Municipal Complex to remain where it is. This is how she avoids dealing with the parking lot problem. She wants Clark to secure the poperty at Brewer from the Board of Ed so Ellenport can continue his rampage at Dawn Drive. Cislo should drive around and observe how other towns maintain their Municipal Property. No other town has a parking lot directly next to homes. Why does Cislo continue to encourage Ellenport to hurt these residents?

Look at the manner in which Cislo accepted all of the praise for Picton Park when it was the Democrats who initially were against rebuilding the park. If Cislo had any class, she would have told Ellenport that the Republcans deserve credit for Picton Park because they were there since the idea to repair the park first began.

Just remember, if Cislo remains silent over Dawn Drive, she will remain silent over everything illegal and horrible that Ellenport will do in the future. Eventually, something will happen in your part of Clark that Ellenport wants and which you oppose and remember, Cislo will do as Ellenport demands. Just as she is doing on Dawn Drive.

Cislo states she will vote with her conscience and for what is in the best interests of her community. This is a very dishonest statement on her part and to prove it, you only need to look on her record of failure at Dawn Drive. To the Picton Park residents, remember, Ellenport did not want you to have that park. He changed his mind when you all became irate. If Ellenport did not change his mind, please know that Cislo would have made sure you never saw a penny of funding. She is not a person we want on Council.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Amy What would happen in Clark if
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

Voter turnout was 100% ?

Voters said 'ENOUGH Ellenport,...the party's over,its time to call it a day'....

Ellenport and his gang had to find honest jobs which would not permit them to affect the lives of so many people in such cavalier ways.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Lisa G To Mr Leroy
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

Where have you been? This is 1999. NO POLITICIAN anywhere-any party- would EVER make statements like the ones you attribute to Mr.Nevargic. I can't believe his opponents and would accuse him of such a thing because NOBODY would believe it and we all know better. Thanks for trying but we aren't buying.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >About Cislo
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

I had a good laugh when I read Cislo's comments that she will vote with her conscience. Cislo now is devoid of a conscience. She relinquished hers the moment she signed up with Ellenport. No one with a conscience would tolerate a mayor who puts parking lots beind houses when plently of other places exist at Brewer for such a structure.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Cislo's comments
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

Cislo also stated that she will not not make any campaign promises that she does not believe she can keep. Is she for real? Every promise she makes is one that Ellenport instructed her to make and he has all of the right connections to ensure that her promises are kept. Sadly, all of the promises she makes will always benefit Ellenport either financially or poltically. Her promises will never benefit any of the residents.

Cislo's problems, like the rest of the Democrats' problems occur whenever they have to negotiate or compromise with the Republicans. This is impossible for them. Kuchar gets wild and Soyka starts her childish ranting and raving. That's when the screaming and fighting begins. Ellenport's gang is totally incapable of open and honest discussion. The Democrats would rather beat someone to death with cheap shots and cheap personal attacks rather than ever allow a Republican viewpoint to stand alone on its own merits. Do you really want another one of Ellenport's lying losers sitting on Council?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >A curious voter who is also
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

a parent. I have been reading the school thread . The subject of the bomb threat was discussed. As a PTA mother has Ms.Cislo stated her opinion on the way the incident was handled ? Did she approve ? Disapprove ? Did she KNOW about it ? What promises (beside Picton) has she been told to make that Ellenport will keep ? Athene, I don't think your Dem 'star' will (out) shine anybody.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Keep up the desparate attacks!
< Date: 25-Oct-99 >

Thanks Ellencrats! Your sick, demented and false attacks on Mr. Nevargic are now completely destroying your already tarnished credibility.

You are exposing "innocent lovely" Mrs. Cislo for the mean-spirited puppet she really is.

Keep up the good work, Demoports... I mean Ellencrats... well, you know what I mean.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >BBC
< Date: 25-Oct-99 >

Mr. Nevargic is NOT a racist. Politically narrow, yes. Potential obstructionist, yes. Bright, yes. Articulate, eh (used big words he doesn't understand too often). Understands politics, no way. Good hearted, yes. Too much time on his hands, yes. LeRoy, you are a liar. Clark residents should vote for Cislo, but not because they think Pete is a racist.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To BBC
< Date: 25-Oct-99 >

Why should we vote Cislo?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Cislo vs. Nevargic
< Date: 26-Oct-99 >

Voting for Cislo would be as good as voting for board members that Ortenzio wants so that he can continue to destroy the schools. Cislo would continue to destroy the town of Clark following Ellenport's instructions. On Nov. 2nd vote for Pete Nevargic an independent mind.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Athene to Anyone who can tell us
< Date: 26-Oct-99 >

Why Cislo was anointed by Ellenport. Political correctness demands a woman but WHAT exactly were the qualities that made her stand out from the other women in the PTA, civic boards etc.? What ellenport standards did she meet that other women did not?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >A reader re Desperate Attacks Oct 25
< Date: 26-Oct-99 >

Your post just on its own was very clever. Brevity and wit ...and the truth. Thank you.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >LeRoy
< Date: 27-Oct-99 >

Is just another phony name used by the Ellenport dems who are desperately trying to hide the truths posted on these threads about what Ellenport and his puppets have been doing to residents...particularly those on Dawn Drive and in the Picton Park area.

Question: Did Mrs. Cislo take water to the elderly residents on Dawn Drive? Or did she just try to exchange water for votes in the partments, since she knows that Daw Drive residents will never support another Ellenport puppet?

Roy

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >2nd Ward Resident
< Date: 28-Oct-99 >

I ran into Mr. Nevargic at the Winsor Diner tonight, (Wed.27/99), and had a very enlightening conversation with him. It seems Ms. Cislo's crunch crew is running scared. He told me that as of 8PM this evening he had 28 campaign lawn signs stolen or distroyed. Some of his neighbors were personally called by the Mayor and asked, "I hear you dont like Pete Nevargic, would you like to put out a Cislo sign?" I heard of "Hutzpa" [sic]but this guy has some gaul! The racist thing is bothering Pete quite a bit, but he says he is kind of used to it now, Ellenport did the same thing last year. He said he is expecting a lot more of the same thing before its over. He wouldn't tell me who it was but a business owner who has Pete's lawn sign desplayed was telephoned last night by a woman who identified herself only as someone from the Democrat Party, and stated to the owner "We will not forget you and your business for having Nevargic's sign. So much for Mrs. Cislo's party.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >the Gestapo - oh sorry, this is still Clark
< Date: 28-Oct-99 >

But lately it's getting difficult to tell the difference. It's amazing how much arm twisting and threats are made when Mr. Ellenport doesn't get his own way. But all this nonsense should tell you how important this election is to Mr. Ellenport. I hope most of you realize why -- he still needs 5 votes to control the financial purse strings in Clark. With Ms. Cislo, his latest ass kisser, that is apparently guaranteed.

Gee, Michelle, is becoming a councilwoman important enough for you to sell your soul to the devil? Since you NEVER dispute anything the mayor says or tells you to do, apparently it is. I pity you. You have children you're raising in this town. Don't you wonder how we're going to pay off all the debt Mr. Ellenport has put us in? Maybe you don't, but our children in the next few years certainly will find out. And if Mr. Wanna-Be-A-Lawyer is telling you something different and you BELIEVE it, then you don't deserve to be a councilwoman because you're not bright enough for the position.

Democrats and Republicans alike, PLEASE think about what is happening to this town and vote your conscience on Nov. 2nd. And if you all DO vote your conscience, Pete Nevargic should win by an OVERWHELMING majority because he honestly wants to do the right thing. Many of us have lived here too long and are disgusted by what's going on lately.

The threats and intimidation by the Ellenport administration are beginning to remind me of another time and place a LONG time ago. We didn't believe what was happening then, even though we heard stories about it and yet the stories turned out to be true. PLEASE listen to some of the stories you're hearing now and ask yourself, COULD THEY ALL BE FALSE? No they're not. Mr. Ellenport will apparently do WHATEVER he needs to do in order to get Ms. Cislo elected, just as Adolf Hitler did whatever he wanted to do to achieve the "perfect" race. Please don't be fooled this year.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >So What Else Is New In Clark At Election Time?
< Date: 28-Oct-99 >

People are called on the phone and made to feel guilty about putting a sign up on their lawn. Lawn Signs are pulled down. This is the democratic way in Clark and has been for years. With so many signs pulled down isn't it amazing that the police don't know about it? They never do and do nothing to stop it. The people of Clark know that the democrats have done things like this for years actually every election. The only way the people can stop the nonsense that the Democrats put us through is to vote for Pete Nevargic on Nov. 2nd. Save the town of Clark from anymore destruction by the Democrats!!!!!!!!!!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Voter
< Date: 28-Oct-99 >

STOP...LOOK...LISTEN TO WHAT IS GOING ON IN CLARK. IF YOU DO, YOU WILL HAVE AN EASY CHOICE....PETE NEVARGIC.

END OF CASE.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >clark
< Date: 28-Oct-99 >

missing signs???? contact Roy Pitass.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Bill Caruso
< Date: 28-Oct-99 >

To Deborah Cannonie CLARK EAGLE MGR Editor.

Dear Deborah, I want you to understand that during to years of my so called heyday if as a elected Offical I was not acrimonious Nothing would have been done .To move Clark forward Manny of the Incompetent Dems and REPS that where in office refused to do their jobs .Some are still Their, that being helping to keep taxes down. They did not repesent the people and thats both partys. However, The new Republicans hopely will do their job. Please try to realize when your under attack by people like Bob Ellenport and his drons you have to be acrimonious at times.To servive Mr Nevargic is his own man He does not listen to me. Every one in our party knows this .Let hope he remenbers what he is up against if elected. B.C.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Clark Eagle 10/28/99
< Date: 28-Oct-99 >

This Week in Clark:

Voters decide 2nd Ward seat Tuesday

By Deborah Cannonie, Managing Editor

Township voters may think that the only referendum they will be facing Tuesday is the LOSAP question, but that's not entirely true.

The real referendum will be the race for Clark's 2nd Ward council seat as a contest between Mayor Robert Ellenport through the appointee he named to the 2nd Ward council vacancy, and a determined Republican party and its second-time candidate for the seat.

The battle for the slot is between Michele Cislo, the Democrat appointed earlier this year when the seat was opened because of a resignation, and Pete Nevargic, her Republican challenger.

Democrat Greg Nozza had won the seat in the last election, but after a few months' service, he abruptly resigned the post earlier this year. Nozza's resignation opened up what had been bloody ground in the 2nd Ward race.

Last time around, Nevargic lost the council seat by only 14 votes. It's not a race Republicans intend on letting slip through their fingers again, and the battle this time has been a long, hard fight. Both Cislo and Nevargic have been stumping through the 2nd Ward, each intent on winning in a house-by-house campaign.

Cislo has been accompanied by Ellenport on her political rounds, while Councilman Sal Bonaccorso — one of Clark's two elected Republican officials — frequently walks with Nevargic.

Cislo, a political newcomer, has used her newness to the political process to her advantage. Ellenport has said that Cislo herself persuaded the county's Democrat-controlled freeholder board to give extra funding to the Picton Park playground in the ward for a fence to finish the park. Republicans have doubted that claim, saying instead that Ellenport used his influence to obtain the grant.

Cislo, a popular mother and PTA member, said she would make the repair of orphan bridges an issue and she would hold the line on taxes through a line-item budget review by the council.

Nevargic has refuted Cislo's claims to be an "independent voice," pointing to her abstention on the controversial parking lot vote. That lot has irritated Dawn Drive residents, because it is very close to their backyards.

A Dawn Drive resident himself, Nevargic took up the cause of his neighbors, although his own home wasn't affected by the parking lot's placement.

Cislo said she abstained because she didn't believe the council had the right to vote on property changes while the Board of Education still owned the Municipal Complex, a former school. She was the only council member who abstained for that vote, which took place at the same meeting she was appointed to her council seat.

Nevargic and other Republicans believe Cislo is merely window-dressing for Ellenport, and if she wins, she will quickly fall into line behind the council's Democratic majority.

For her part, Cislo and other Democrats have tried to link Nevargic, a retired Newark police captain, with former Councilman Bill Caruso.

It's a claim Nevargic hotly disputes. He and Bonaccorso have maintained a cordial but distant relationship with Caruso, whom many believe was a center of some of the township's acrimonious politics in his heyday.

Nevargic has his own ideas for the 2nd Ward, such as traffic control and tree-cutting, but he believes his election would go beyond the boundaries of his ward. That's because the election of a Republican to the seat would deprive the mayor of the 5-2 majority his party holds.

Ellenport would have to persuade Nevargic, Bonaccorso, or Republican Councilwoman Dee Memmer if he would have his measures pass the council's approval.

Copyright © 1999 Worrall Community Newspapers, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Wow.
< Date: 28-Oct-99 >

I just saw a picture of Michele Cislo what a doggie bone Please voters keep her home with the kids .

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 28-Oct-99 >

Hey Nervargic 3 Strikes and your out...Board of Ed...strike 1 Town council last time....Strike 2 This election ...??????

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Elroy
< Date: 28-Oct-99 >

Mr. Nevargic is one of the finest men in our community. I have always found him to be honest and courageous. You can always count on him to be on the right side on most any issue. Men like him can help us bring Clark back to where it should be. When a small group of people like those on Dawn Drive are picked out for harassment, it reflects badly on the entire town. At least, Nevargic will stand up for the residents of his ward, unlike Cislo. The other reason that I will vote for Nevargic is because he seems to understand that high taxes are killing us. We need somebody to get costs under control.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Mickey
< Date: 28-Oct-99 >

High taxes has been a problem for the last year or more. The democrats have done nothing to stop taxes from rising. When the board of education budget was defeated the democrats cut it the smallest amount they possibly could. Elect a republican. Elect Nevargic on Nov. 2nd.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Taxpayers
< Date: 29-Oct-99 >

If Bob Ellenport is supporting Losap thats our Cue to vote it down. We know He likes to spend our money.

DON"T BE A SAP VOTE NO FOR LOSAP'''''''''''''''''''''' No day time courvage no Pensens.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 29-Oct-99 >

I received a letter from Cislo regarding Mr. Nevargic's apology to the Sheriff it shows that this man can not be counted on to to tell the truth and more unbelievable is his campaign manger's chauvinistic comments. VOTE FOR CISLO

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To Above
< Date: 29-Oct-99 >

Could you please be a little more vague.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >2ND WARD VOTER
< Date: 29-Oct-99 >

I received Mayor Ellenport's personal endorsement of 2nd Ward councilwoman Michele Cislo today in the mail. That did it! I was contemplating a vote for Cislo, but with the Mayor's endorsement, there is no way I will vote for her. Mr. Nevaregic, you have my vote..

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >John on Coldiven Rd.
< Date: 29-Oct-99 >

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >John on Coldevin Rd.
< Date: 29-Oct-99 >

If there is any reason at all not to vote for Cislo, its the Mayor's endorsement!!!!!!!!!!!!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Just a cheer
< Date: 30-Oct-99 >

PETE PETE PETE PETE PETE PETE PETE PETE PETE PETE PETE . Nov 2 be there. get out and vote.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Athene Ever notice
< Date: 30-Oct-99 >

how political life in Clark parallels events in D.C.? Even so politically correct to the IMPOSITION of a certain female candidate whose qualifications (if any) are questionable.

In 1992 Dems rejected an honorable, capable, plain spoken, UNglamorous Paul Tsongas to give us everlasting shame in a flashy,trashy, ruthless coniving demogogue . Local politics can short circuit this disease of dictatorship dynasties. Don't give total power to one party and one individual. It will ensure that politicians will look over each others shoulder and not look the other way when corruption calls.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >CHARLES RAMSHAW
< Date: 30-Oct-99 >

More Clark Patriot Nonsense

NEVARGIC, NOT CISLO, IS THE CLEAR CHOICE

by Charles Ramshaw

That anonymous newspaper - The Clark Patriot - is at it once again. Here is just some of what they said, most of which Cislo used in a recent campaign flyer.

The Patriot said Nozza "quit soon after taking office as Second Ward Councilman due to the outright hostility of Clark's local political community."

The Patriot said Cislo won county funds for Picton Park.

The Patriot said Nevargic seems motivated to stop Mayor Ellenport from doing his job. They fear that Nevargic is an obstructionist.

Ellenport believes that anybody who has differing opinions from his own is an obstructionist. Ellenport has proven himself to be a failure in politics and in his personal life. He has harassed homeowners with nasty blackmail attempts and he had to file for bankruptcy last year after many years of financial trouble.

Cislo has been nothing more than an Ellenport Stepford wife. Ellenport has used every opportunity he has had to drum up false praise for Cislo. Cislo got nothing for Picton Park. The hard working people who live in the area are solely responsible for "winning county funds." Why does the Patriot fail to mention that it was Ellenport's Council who failed these residents in the first place?

As far as Nozza goes, what else can be said that has not been said already. It was Nozza who was most outspoken about not wanting to help the Picton residents. If any hostility was generated, it was generated by Nozza's absurd comments about the Picton Park and Dawn Drive situations. To blame Nozza's problems on anyone other than himself is totally wrong.

I'm sorry. I wanted to give Cislo a chance, but Ellenport has totally consumed her and he has branded her with his selfish agenda.

Pete Nevargic is the clear cut choice.

Charles Ramshaw - 1999

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Nevargic is Obstructionist to
< Date: 30-Oct-99 >

mayor dishonor?

I'll drink to that !

I'll even vote for him!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Cislo should not be elected
< Date: 31-Oct-99 >

Do not be fooled into believing any of the propaganda that Cislo and Ellenport are throwing on your doorstep and printing in the newspapers. Cislo is not going to work for the best interests of Clark. Ellenport supports this woman only because she will exactly as she is instructed to do by Ellenport. We have seen many examples of Cislo's failure to think for herself. Every decision she seems to be making has been wellcrafted by Ellenport. Every word, every vote and every smile is scheduled by Ellenport. Cislo is just a younger version of Marie Soyka and we have all had enough of that battleaxe.

Should Cislo win this election, all of Clark will lose out from gaining the independent and responsible decision maker we would have in Peter Nevargic. Mr. Nevargic is truly his own person and not a robot on a short rope like Cislo. We have had enough of the Ellenports, Kuchars,Ferraras,Soykas and Kazanowskis on Council. Please do not add another Ellenport puppet to this mix. Reclaim some of the voice that would be returned to the people if Nevargic is elected. Cislo is a very sorry excuse for a politician. She is just an Ellenport lackey and she has proven herself as such. Do not give her any credit at all for Picton Park funding. That entire spectacle was totally contrived by Ellenport and Scutari to make the Republicans look bad. The Democrats made themselves look terrible for screwing the Picton Park residents from the start. And Dawn Drive? Cislo had a million opportunities to change the plight that Ellenport has brought upon those long suffering residents and she refuses to intervene. Cislo would rather watch those residents in her ward suffer than to even attempt to try to change Ellenport's twisted mind. She has proven that she is the perfect Democrat...nothing but a puppet.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >The Democrats and Cislo
< Date: 31-Oct-99 >

Not what we want in Clark. Taxes are too high. They have not proved that they can curb them. School budgets are cut minimally to do their friends on the Board of Education a favor. All you have to do is go back to their last vote to find proof of that. There are always lawsuits and bonds. Clark is being dug deeper and deeper into the ground. Many houses are for sale because people can not afford to live in Clark anymore. As the Democrats friend Mr. Timoni would say who is the president of the board of education if the seniors can not afford the taxes they should move out of town. Everything stated about the democrats has facts and proof behind it. Unlike the democrats who do not have proof for everything that they write and send out as campaign literature facts and proof are two things that the republicans depend on to send a message to the public. The democrats have proven to resort to low attacks without any backup in their desperation to win this election. Mr. Nozza is a prime example of a democrat who had to resign after a few months in office because he went against the citizens that he represented. Mayor Ellenport has tried to turn this around to show that Cislo is trying to do everything possible for the citizens but has failed miserably. Voters please consider when voting on Tues. Nov. 2nd what you vote means, voting for a democrat will only force you to move out of town and dig Clark deeper into the ground. Vote for PETE NEVARGIC ON NOV. 2ND.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Cislo's Lies
< Date: 31-Oct-99 >

In the Clark Eagle article entitled "Second Ward Seat will be determined" we see clear evidence that Cislo is a lying Ellenport muppet. Cislo's reasons for abstaining from the Dawn Drive vote were repeated. According to Cislo, she abstained from the Dawn Drive vote because she "didn't believe the council had the right to vote on property changes while the Board of Education still owned the Municipal Complex, a former school." Cislo is a real piece of work.

Cislo refused to vote on the parking lot issue,yet her boss, Mayor Ellenport has been abusing the grass area at Town Hall for over five years even though the Board of Education owns that land and Cislo does not see anything wrong with this illegal behavior. Cislo refuses to legally vote on the issue and yet she fully supports Ellenport's illegal behavior. Cislo abstained on Dawn Drive ONLY because Ellenport instructed her to abstain. Had Cislo voted to do things the right way over the parking lot, her ward residents would not be suffering anymore. From Day One, Cislo has been doing the Ellenport Tap Dance.

Please do not vote for this woman. I have a feeling that after the election, if Cislo should win, all of a sudden, all of that Picton Park money will suddenly become unavailable. It was all a scam. If you really want to see a continued scam job, just look at Dawn Drive.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >NEWS DESK
< Date: 31-Oct-99 >

Pete and Cislo TO SHOOT IT OUT AT PICTON PARK . Pete don't for get the phony Gun .

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Scocer Mom
< Date: 31-Oct-99 >

I am glad to read the Republican flyer today. That they do not endorse Caruso's housing plan. I figured this was another sick move by Cislo mentor, "Ellenport".

MICHELE, YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF. ELLENPORT HAS NOW CORRUPTED YOUR MIND. RESIGN FROM THE PTA.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >TO SOCCER MOM
< Date: 31-Oct-99 >

Marty Ferrara told me yesterday that the Republicans were supporting Caruso's housing plan. I am glad to see Ferrara was lying to support Ellenport's hand-picked puppet candidate Cislo!

Marty! Shut your big mouth and wear a suite to the next meeting...your a discrace. GO GOP!!!!!!!!!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >We Will Remember
< Date: 31-Oct-99 >

The voter's will remember how Nozza let them down. The democrats will lose for this reason alone. Vote Pete Nevargic on Nov. 2nd.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >A Senior Citizen wanting Senior Housing
< Date: 31-Oct-99 >

TO: Pete, Sal & John

I received your flyer today disavowing yourself concerning your support for Mr. Caruso's Senior Citizens Housing plan.

Tell me before Tuesday's election.....

WHAT SENIOR HOUSING PLAN ARE YOU SUPPORTING, IF ANY????????, AND......,WHERE WILL YOU BUILD IT????????????????????

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >clark
< Date: 31-Oct-99 >

They are goining to build it on sal's fathers' property on featherbed.They are going to call it caruso's home for the aging.And the all the " R "s have a room reserved,and caruso will be the director.sal will be the landscaper and pete will be head of securty.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Lenny from Fulton
< Date: 31-Oct-99 >

The stink from Nozza still permeates through the Democratic party in Clark. We need a change desperately. Mr. Nevargic is my Choice.

I hope the Patriot is wrong about low voter turnout. We can not let another Nozza fiasco happen again ^ so we have to show up and make sure it doesn't happen. It only takes 5 minutes to vote ^ so let's do it.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >What Chuck really wrote
< Date: 01-Nov-99 >

And he's right on the money.

More Clark Patriot Nonsense

NEVARGIC, NOT CISLO, IS THE CLEAR CHOICE

by Charles Ramshaw

That anonymous newspaper - The Clark Patriot - is at it once again. Here is just some of what they said, most of which Cislo used in a recent campaign flyer.

The Patriot said Nozza "quit soon after taking office as Second Ward Councilman due to the outright hostility of Clark's local political community."

The Patriot said Cislo won county funds for Picton Park.

The Patriot said Nevargic seems motivated to stop Mayor Ellenport from doing his job. They fear that Nevargic is an obstructionist.

Ellenport believes that anybody who has differing opinions from his own is an obstructionist. Ellenport has proven himself to be a failure in politics and in his personal life. He has harassed homeowners with nasty blackmail attempts and he had to file for bankruptcy last year after many years of financial trouble.

Cislo has been nothing more than an Ellenport Stepford wife. Ellenport has used every opportunity he has had to drum up false praise for Cislo. Cislo got nothing for Picton Park. The hard working people who live in the area are solely responsible for "winning county funds." Why does the Patriot fail to mention that it was Ellenport's Council who failed these residents in the first place?

As far as Nozza goes, what else can be said that has not been said already. It was Nozza who was most outspoken about not wanting to help the Picton residents. If any hostility was generated, it was generated by Nozza's absurd comments about the Picton Park and Dawn Drive situations. To blame Nozza's problems on anyone other than himself is totally wrong.

I'm sorry. I wanted to give Cislo a chance, but Ellenport has totally consumed her and he has branded her with his selfish agenda.

Pete Nevargic is the clear cut choice.

Charles Ramshaw - 1999

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >VOTER
< Date: 01-Nov-99 >

Mr. Nevargic what is your position on Gun control ?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Voter
< Date: 01-Nov-99 >

Mrs. Cislo how do you feel about the bomb scare at Kumpf School?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >When all is said and done
< Date: 01-Nov-99 >

Cislo will be out councilwoman. Face it she is in the PTA, with all her contacts, her husband is involved with softball and has that constituency and the over riding reason is the 2nd ward is a democratic ward and the republicans can not overcome this. Let me be the first to Congratulate councilwoman Cislo on her win.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Ellenport is not stupid
< Date: 01-Nov-99 >

Ellenport was not stupid when he picked Cislo as Nozza's replacement. Yes, she and her husband do have contacts in the all-important PTA and Softball categories. Cislo is a Nurse and a mother of three small children. What a wonderful woman.

Cislo is the Anti-Nozza.

She gives Ellenport the best chance to win in this election, no doubt. However, even those who blindly support Ellenport have to admit that she unqualified for Council. She is not the sharpest too in the shed. She is, however, the all important money vote, as Nevargic likes to call it, and she will do as Ellenport desires.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >True but Sad
< Date: 01-Nov-99 >

It is a shame but I agree with the person who said that Cislo will be the next council person. The Mayor has it in his mind he wants mediocre candidates that can bring in the votes through their involvement with township activities, but he could still control during and after his reign as Mayor. With this mindset the town will never advance to a premier town to live in.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Clark is a premier town to live in ...
< Date: 01-Nov-99 >

but not because of Ellenport.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >On premier towns
< Date: 01-Nov-99 >

Any town that would reelect Ellenport and elect representatives based on their popularity as opposed to their qualifications and ability to govern can not be considered a premier town. While the economy is going good it is easy to run the town, the tax base is rising and people do not mind paying more in taxes, Myself excluded I do mind paying additional taxes. But when we hit a downturn I do not see the Democrats having the fortitude to do the right thing and reduce taxes. Also, think about what we get for our taxes, bulky pick-up at best every other year, we pay for our own garbage, as for the children why does the PTA have to pay for safety surfaces in the playground, and parents must raise money for funtime junction? Shouldn't these be projects paid for by the town? Why are they building on every inch of open land? I see across from the high school there are 2 lots with 65 feet frontage and 200 + feet in depth. This type of building could not be good for the town and who is initiating it, the Mayor, who is receiving money from the builders, just looks at Councilwoman Cislo's elect report. I hope the voters see this and see this and don't let the current trend continue.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Disgusted with the money people!!!
< Date: 01-Nov-99 >

Just take a look at Cislo's last campaign treasurer's report. It looks like "Who's Who" in the real estate world. I geuss they are lining up to get the support from Ms. Cislo along with there favorite mayor to build on every postage stamp piece property we have left in Clark before he goes to jail.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Sheriff Froehlich and Michele
< Date: 01-Nov-99 >

Michele,that is a nice picture of you and Sheriff Froelich in your flyer I received in the mail today. One thing that bothers me though....you being a woman and all, how do you feel standing next to a elected public servant who feels the way he does about female employees? You must be aware of the news article (Newark Star-Ledger, 3/9/99). "COUNTY SETTLES SEX HARASSMENT CASE." Excerpts read; "Union County officials have approved a $150,000.00 settlement with a sheriff's officer who claimed her superior sexually harassed her and the SHERIFF FAILED TO ADDRESS THE SITUATION. The settlement came more that three years after Officer Patricia Smith filed the complaint in Superior Court in Elizabeth against Sgt. Donald McBride and SHERRIF RALPH FROEHLICH." Michele, he states you have the; "High qualities of integrity and decency that too many candidates for public office lack." Gee Michele I geuss that means him too!!!!! Nice picture, bad company. "People who live in glass houses should not throw stones! Why dont you try taking some pictures with some reputable public servants like Mr. Nevargic did?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >WHAT A SICK JOKE.
< Date: 01-Nov-99 >

THE VOTERS HAVE TO PICK BETWEEN A AIRHEAD OR A LOOSE CANNON WE ALL SHOULD STAY HOME.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Nevargic All The Way
< Date: 01-Nov-99 >

Cislo will lose tomorrow she believes in high taxes she voted for a small reduction in the school budget. She acted like she was interested in Picton Park but nothing ever happened with that before the elections so of course that is another empty campaign promise by the democrats. Nozza is still in the minds of the second ward voter. His disloyalty to the citizens will be remembered in this election. Vote Nevargic on Nov. 2nd for honesty in government.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >TO WHAT A SICK JOKE
< Date: 01-Nov-99 >

Yeah, stay home, that will help, Ellenport can claim a victory like when you stayed home when he ran for re-election. What a jerk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Clark
< Date: 01-Nov-99 >

last chance,last night for lies against Cislo. tuesday nite we can start the message board for three time losers.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Clark Eagle
< Date: 01-Nov-99 >

The Eagle got this one 100% correct. They stressed that Ellenport does not deserve to be Mayor. They pointed specifically to his treatment of the Dawn Drive homeowners, which has been horrible. They believe that Ellenport deserves to be removed from office and thus his hand picked council candidate (Cislo) should not be allowed to finish Nozza's term.

Cislo's should not be Elected and Ellenport deserves to be removed from office.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 02-Nov-99 >

To What a sick Joke:

You hit the nail on the head! Nevergic is really a loose cannon. Full of threats and people have seen through him and his speeches that have been written by the likes of JH Barr, Ernest Spies, Bill Caruso, and Sal Bonnacurso.

All of these people are political has beens and I truly believe that Michele Cislo will win tomorrow.

People its up to you...It's your turn make Pete Nevargic a THREE TIME LOSER!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Clark Has Hope
< Date: 02-Nov-99 >

If Pete Nevargic is elected today Clark could have hope. If Cislo is elected Clark will be dug deeper and deeper into the ground. Let's have a chance to reduce our taxes and elect a republican. Vote Nevargic.Cislo will just vote for small cuts in school budgets and council budgets to increase our taxes even more. She already has.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Love thy neighbor
< Date: 02-Nov-99 >

Remember the golden rule . . . put yourself in the shoes of the people living on Dawn Drive. Nevargic's election will show that we have no tolerance for the abuse of political p[ower.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Dawn Drive
< Date: 02-Nov-99 >

If you don't live on Dawn Drive, you really can't understand what Ellenport has done to us. I never thought that I would be harassed by a public figure like this and I never knew somebody could be so mean.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Dawn Drive
< Date: 02-Nov-99 >

If you don't live on Dawn Drive, you really can't understand what Ellenport has done to us. I never thought that I would be harassed by a public figure like this and I never knew somebody could be so mean.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Hot news
< Date: 02-Nov-99 >

Pete Nevargic wins buy 175 elected new councilperson.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Updated Hot News
< Date: 02-Nov-99 >

The election link on the Clark Report shows Nevargic winning by 224 votes (648 to 424). This was at 10:40 PM on Tuesday evening.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Outcome Was Predictable
< Date: 02-Nov-99 >

Ellenport made serious mistakes. Having Cislo ignore Dawn Drive was critical. Cislo had to prove that she was not just another Ellenport puppet; Ellenport's blatant Picton Park charade was not enough to disprove this. I truly believe that the residents of the Clark's second ward finally have an independent voice that will fight for them.

-Charles Ramshaw

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Outcome Was Predictable
< Date: 02-Nov-99 >

Ellenport made serious mistakes. Having Cislo ignore Dawn Drive was critical. Cislo had to prove that she was not just another Ellenport puppet; Ellenport's blatant Picton Park charade was not enough to disprove this. I truly believe that the residents of Clark's second ward finally have an independent voice that will fight for them.

-Charles Ramshaw

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >other mistakes
< Date: 02-Nov-99 >

picking cislo was a mistake becuase its puzzling to think that she was the best that the clark democrat party had too offer. I also think that this landslide victory is backlash against ellenport. in its last issue the clark eagle painted a very disturbing picture of ellenport in its editorial section. i think this had a lasting impression on the voters.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >What did we learn tonight
< Date: 02-Nov-99 >

If the Democractic Party is smart, they will realize that Ellenport is now the kiss of death in any election.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Nevargic Deserved This
< Date: 03-Nov-99 >

As pitifull as Ellenport is it was clear that Nevargic was the best choice for Clark. The people of the second ward now have their rights back.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Congratulations Pete
< Date: 03-Nov-99 >

LANDSLIDE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >LOSAP
< Date: 03-Nov-99 >

What was the vote on LOSAP?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Amy to Clark Nov 1 post
< Date: 03-Nov-99 >

Besides yourself, who are the other two ? ?

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >
< Date: 03-Nov-99 >

Congratulations Pete!!!! The message has been sent!!!!

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >LOSAP
< Date: 03-Nov-99 >

The vote on LOSAP was a resounding YES. This was even more of a landslide than Pete's.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >It's official
< Date: 03-Nov-99 >

CLARK: Republican Nevargic gains seat on council

Published in the Home News Tribune

By SUZANNE C. RUSSELL

STAFF WRITER

Republican Pete Nevargic's second bid for the Clark Township Council paid off yesterday as he won the 2nd Ward seat.

Nevargic, elected to an unexpired three-year term, defeated Democratic Councilwoman Michele Cislo by an unofficial tally of 648 to 424.

Nevargic last night attributed his win by 224 votes to "hard work and good friends."

The results do not affect the balance of power on the council -- Democrats will hold a 4-3 majority next year.

Township voters also approved the creation of Length of Service Award Programs for public-safety volunteers by an unofficial vote of 1,774 to 694.

Under the program, Clark full-time first-aid and Fire Department volunteers will be eligible for $1,150 each year, provided they meet the five-year minimum requirement. Part-time rescue squad members would be eligible for $550 a year. If they quit before serving five years, the money reverts to the township's LOSAP account.

Second Ward Councilman Greg Nozza, a Democrat, resigned in March after three months in office. Cislo, a part-time school nurse for special-needs children at Kohler School in Winfield Park, was appointed to fill the vacancy.

Nozza defeated Nevargic, a retired Newark police captain, in last year's 2nd Ward race by 12 votes.

from the Home News Tribune

Published: November 3, 1999

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >J.H. Barr
< Date: 04-Nov-99 >

It's been a while since I posted a message on these threads, so I think I'm entitled to say a few things.

First, congratulations are in order to both Pete and Chuck Ramshaw. Chuck definitely played a role in communicating the message about what I call Democratic "puppet politics."

Second, Pete Nevargic makes his own speeches, and doesn't need any help from anyone else. Pete, Sal, Ernie and I did collaborate extensively on Pete's campaign literature, but Pete's victory was really the result of a comprehensive campaign strategy which I will not discuss here. Bill Caruso did not participate at all.

Third, I think that the Democratic campaign this year was the nastiest I've ever seen. Pete was subjected to numerous false allegations, his supporters were threatened and harrassed, and a large number of his campaign signs were stoled or destroyed. If Republiicans do these things, I'm the first person to take them to task. People trust me because they know I'll publicly praise my opponent for a good campaign and I'll criticize my own party when Republicans engage in wrongdoing. Last year, the Democrats ran a good campaign, and I angered many friends by saying so in the newspapers. This year, the Democrats ran an abysmal campaign. Although I generally enjoy matching campign wits with our politically savvy mayor, I was unpleasantly surprised that the Democrats engaged in so much mudslinging.

The prior post which mentions me states that I'm a political "has been." In the context that I assisted the second ward Republican campaign, and Pete Nevargic "HAS BEEN" elected, I'll accept that label.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To: J.H. Barr
< Date: 04-Nov-99 >

I agree with your post 100%. The democrats are desperate and their actions are desperate. In years past I don't think that signs being removed was a problem. Now it is. I don't know what they think they will accomplish by this. Maybe they feel if there are more of their signs that people will remember their candidates name better. Everyone knows that signs do not win an election. Voters that show up at the polls do. As has been proven in the last few elections. Again the mudslinging and discouragement of people who have put up signs for their opponent is inexcusable. People should do what they want to do and not be told not to do it after it has been done. Once again the democrats actions are desperate. They deserve to lose every election.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Lisa G to 'Clark' Thanks
< Date: 04-Nov-99 >

Your twisted distortions of Ramshaw's facts and your plagiarism impressed nobody . YOU are the BEST THING that has happened FOR REPUBLICANS on these threads .

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To Charles Ramshaw
< Date: 04-Nov-99 >

I would like to thank you for caring enough about Clark to develop this very badly needed Web Page. I truly believe that you influenced a tremendous amount of people in the Second Ward Election. Without your efforts, we all would have been stuck with Cislo who is sadly just an very empty headed, dim witted Ellenport dolt. A lot of people would have been fooled by her phoney sweetness and her staged smile. Thank you for spreading the word that Cislo is just another sorry excuse for a Democrat. I hope Peter Nevargic can have an impact upon the currently Democrat controlled rubber stamp council. Councilman Bonnacorso and Councilwoman Memmer try their best best they are constantly harassed by Kuchar, Soyka the guard dog and the remaining lot of Ellenport failures who now pollute the Council. Hopefully, Nevargic can help his ward and all of Clark despite the constant bombardment of trash talk put forth by Ellenport and his gang of idiots.

As for Dawn Drive,I do not live on that street but I based my decision to vote for Nevargic in great part because I detest how horribly Ellenport has treated those residents. I know quite a few people who also deem that parking lot to be offensive and very degrading. They voted for Nvargic because he is by far the superior candidate; however, they were casting vote AGAINST Ellenport and Cislo because of the abuse they have hurled against Dawn Drive. We voted against Cislo because she refused to confront Ellenport about removing the parking lot away from Dawn Drive. Some people said there was no way Cislo could stand up for the Dawn Drive people because she is a Democrat Puppet who cannot dare defy Ellenport. That is true and that is exactly the reason why she was defeated this time. Cislo's silence on Dawn Drive and her blatant refusal to even attempt to reason with Ellenport over his ugly parking lot helped her lose this election. Ellenport's maliciousness and thickheadedness over Dawn Drive really screwed him this time. All of his rotten harassment tactics and his cruelness to Dawn Drive came back and bit him right where it hurts. Because Ellenport has vilified and tortured Dawn Drive homeowners for over five years, the people paid him back big time. Ellenport's prize is another Republican on Council.

We have all seen too many meetings wherein Dawn Drive residents pleaded to have that parking lot moved only to be denounced by Soyka and Kuchar. Further, the news spread fast around Clark about Ellenport sending a Police Officer to a Dawn Drive home after a meeting and the news traveled quickly about how terribly Marty Ferrara treated the Dawn Drive residents who attended meetings with him. Ellenport could not possibly be so deluded as to believe that people would support one of his puppets while we have been watching him degrade Dawn Drive and abuse those homeowners. No one can stand another Ellenport lackey sitting on Council who refuses to ever challenge Ellenport. Cislo has no one to thank for her defeat except Ellenport and her pathetic, sorry self.

Ellenport really should wake up and get that parking lot away from Dawn Drive because if he continues his rampage against those residents, he will never be reelected and every Democrat on that Council will also be defeated by Republicans. We do not like the way Ellenport is treating our neighbors and we made it known through Cislo.

The Clark Eagle and Charles Ramshaw really told us what is happening around here.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Athene re Lisa G
< Date: 04-Nov-99 >

We dismiss those 'Clark' posts for the trash they are, but you fail to acknowledge that there might have been DEM voters who voted their conscience and not their party.

There are those Dems who know right from wrong and might have decided that this election was not FOR Nevargic but AGAINST Ellenport.

Concede the possibility that some town Dems would also say 'enough is enough, Ellenport'.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Where are the Dems Now?
< Date: 04-Nov-99 >

Either laying low or planning their next attack.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Ellenport
< Date: 04-Nov-99 >

To Dawn Drive: I agree with the few posts above which claimed that many citizens voted against Cislo because she was going along with Ellenport's Parking Lot. By now, Ellenport has got to realize that you cannot continually hurt and demean people in Clark and still stay in office. If the rest of his party and the Board of Education has any brains, they will tell Ellenport to terminate that thing he has behind your houses now. Mr. Timoni should then advise his dear friend Ellenport to either totally give up on this parking lot idea because it is not needed or he should at the very least tell Ellenport to put it next to the tennis courts. Further, no one should be spending all of that money (OVER $80,000.00) on a parking lot for so few.

I agree that the lot is just for employees. I passed by Brewer early the other morning and the employees were already parked on the gravel. Just as these posts proclaim, the paved lot was totally empty. Why should our money go to pave a lot for Ellenport and those employees when they already have a newly repaved parking area at the tennis courts?

At this point, the only people who still want to see a parking lot behind the homes are the rest of Ellenport's remaining Democratic pandering clowns on Council and the Fun Time Junction group who really think Ellenport is building this parking lot for the. Wake up already. The parking lot has been next to those homes for years while Ellenport just dreamed up Fun Time Junction to lure in support for a paved lot. Ellenport lured Cislo in an look at what he fool he helped to make out of her. The Junior Soyka is out!

The Clark Eagle should be congratulated for their editorial in support of Nevargic. They editors also are aware of the misery Ellennport has inflicted on those residents and I am very glad the Democrats lost this election because of Ellenport's abuses towards those people. The Dawn Drive problem is a major one caused by Ellenport. A man like him and his followers who agree to step all over those residents do not deserve to hold office.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To above
< Date: 04-Nov-99 >

Yes, the Eagle deserves credit for speaking out on behalf of Dawn Drive and so does Charles Ramshaw for creating ths page that reports the truth and for giving people a space to air their gripes against the parking lot. It is a horrible thing that Ellenport has done there. I think a lot of people in Clark believe that the Ellenport Parking Lot is a disgrace and they voted for Nevargic because he became involved and attempted to help out those residents. When will Ellenport put an end to it?

The above post is correct in stating that the few remainiing supporters of that parking site include the Fun Time Junction people because they fail to believe that Ellenport lied to them. Where has Jim Ulrich been? He would defend the parking lot to the end because he does not live on Dawn Drive. I suppose Ellenport ordered a vow of silence from Jim. Since Jim wants the playground, he will do exactly as Ellenport orders. Nozza and Cislo followed Ellenport's orders and now they are the laughingstocks of Clark. The Democrats have to start to realize that if they are going to go anyplace in Clark, they must totally clean house and rid themselves of their current trash pile. Ellenport and Kuchar must be the firsts to be thrown out.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Regarding Trash Disposal
< Date: 04-Nov-99 >

After they throw away Ellenport, Kuchar, Soyka and the rest of the Democrat garbage that sits on Council, they have to toss away Carmine Giordano and Sandy Kaplan. I read on this page that Giordano told the Dawn Drive residents that "they don't count for nothing." Those residents are a major reason why Cislo and Ellenport are big time losers now.

All the fake niceness that Ellenport crammed down our throats aver Picton Park could never undo the damage he has done to Dawn Drive.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Loose Cannons
< Date: 04-Nov-99 >

Pete Nevargic is not a "loose cannon." He is a very smart and reasonable person. He could never have done the job he did as a high ranking policeman in Newark if he were a loose cannon. Giordano, Sandford Kaplan and Kuchar in contrast are perfect examples of mean spirited and very verbally abusive "loose cannons." The more the Clark Report told us about each of them, the more we decided that it was high time to begin purging our government of Ellenport lovers. They are very detrimental to Clark. Ellenport is not a loose cannon, he is a sneaky, creepy lowlife who keeps a gang of people around him who will mouth off for him. Although, Ellenport started to go over the edge whe Councilman Bonnacorso started to ask Ellenport some very direct questions about the budget during the last meeting. Of course, Kuchar the Bully jumped right in and attacked Bonnacorso with assistance from Marie Soyka soon to follow. Ellenport's army always attacks whoever asked a question as opposed to letting Ellenport just finish answering it. They should let Ellenport finish talking; all he is doing is givin us a whole string of lies. They must figure that the more Ellenport lies, the more questions the Republicans can raise. When Ellenport started to choke while talking, it was obvious he has a great deal to hide from us.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Ellenport keeps on lying
< Date: 04-Nov-99 >

In this week's Clark Eagle, Ellenport has the gall to blame Cislo's loss on poor voter turnout due to the "inclement weather." This man really thinks everyone here is too stupid for words. Ellenport may actually think that voters accepted Cislo and her phoney niceness. Not even Ellenport can dismiss the fact that of those people who did vote, a clear message was sent that he Democrats are not the party of choice in Clark. More and more voters are seeing through Ellenport and they are focusing upon and deeply considering all of his wrong doing. They refuse to support a candidate that is just so grossly aligned with him.

Nevargic was the best candidate no matter whom the opponent but Cislo was just too sorry for words. She and Ellenport are a disgrace. Dawn Drive did Cislo in and Ellenport is the cause of that whole fiasco. If this defeat does not teach him that tyranny will not be tolerated in Clark than nothing will.

Ellenport, you can blame the weather, heaven knows you always find someone or something else to blame but wake up. It's time you blamed the gravel and traffic you have all over that grass area at Town Hall for Cislo's defeat. In other words, blame yourself for Cislo's loss and finally accept all of the responsibility for the failures in your political party and your life. You have just hurt those Dawn Drive people for too many years and it is finally coming back to haunt you.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Bill Caruso
< Date: 04-Nov-99 >

Thanks to J.H. BARR for coming out and stateing THAT I had nothing to do with the ELECTION . They are responable for their own smut on both sides. Lets stop blameing me for all the Bullshit in this past race. Bill Caruso.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >The Weather?
< Date: 04-Nov-99 >

The weather wasn't good but people that voted for Nevargic didn't let it stop them from coming out to vote. It was a landslide.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Ellenport's pathetic weather excuse
< Date: 04-Nov-99 >

Ellenport will never admit that people voted against him because of the dirt and scandal that plagues him and his administration. When I read that he was blaming the loss on the bad weather I couldn't help but think of that old Milli-Vanilli song..."Blame it on the Rain." At least Milli-Vanilli had entertainment value and they admitted that they had deceived the public. Ellenport will never admit to his deceptions or to all of his corruptions. He prefers to blame everything on ghosts, shadows and strange spirits rather than just admit to being a total liar and fraud. Ellenport really sunk to an all time low this time with that sad story. If a million people had voted on Tuesday, Nevargic would have won. Face it Ellenport, you made your bed, your political career is coming to a very boring halt. Ellenport will never just resign but at least we will no longer be subjected to Cislo.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Finally...
< Date: 05-Nov-99 >

The Winds of Change have begun sweeping Clark. First, Nozza ran with his tail between his legs by resigning as soon as some of his constituents stood up to him. Then Ellenport was forced to get funds for Picton Park. Now Pete Nevargic has routed the New and Improved Ellenport Puppet.

The voters of Clark have proved they are fed up, and aren't going to take Ellenport's tyranny anymore. While the Ellenport dems still have a 4-3 edge, it will be harder for the mayor to railroad his Will upon the people of Clark.

But let's not forget that the true Democrats in town helped hand Ellenport this embarrassing defeat. As I've stated in the past, there are two types of Dems in town: Real Democrats - honest, ethical people - and Ellenport dems, who are nothing but the blind followers of a scoundrel.

Congratulations, Pete. Give 'em hell!

Roy Pitta

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Voter Turnout
< Date: 05-Nov-99 >

The voter turnout was just right for and off year election. Usually an election like this can be one with over 500 votes. On presidential race years it is about 700 votes. The weather is just an excuse. Cislo just had a very low vote count. There was still the 1000 votes out.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To: Voter Turnout
< Date: 05-Nov-99 >

I agree when Donofrio the democrat ran quite a few years ago he lost by very few votes and it was in the 500 range. The voter turnout was just as it should be in an off year election. One thousand votes is the average. Cislo had about the lowest amount of votes that I have ever seen. Weather had nothing to do with it. A presidential election will pull about 700 votes to win.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Pete Nevargic
< Date: 05-Nov-99 >

To all the voters of the 2nd Ward, (Republicans, Democrats and Independents), who supported me and who took the time to come out and vote on a very inclement day. You must be congratulated on your desire to make our town of Clark a better place to live, raise children, and feel comfortable that you have acted in manner that by your actions you have done something to insure that it (Clark),has a very good chance to stay that way. You did this with your vote. Our Founding Fathers designed it that way and you proved once again that they were right. I want to personaly thank everyone of you who supported me. And to Roy Pita and Chuck, a heartfelt THANK YOU for defending me on this thread against some very vicious postings that appeared as the campaign came to a close. You have created an avenue for salutations and redress, something that we have experienced for the first time in our local political arena. Although I was hurt by some, I was praised by others, and that is the right of the people. Public input will always have the major bearing on the choosing of representatives. I wish it could always reflect the truth, but it is what we have as an avenue of redress and it is the best this world has to offer. Once again to all of you on this thread, thank you for making your feelings and thoughts known to me. You have no idea how much your comments helped shape my campaign strategy.

I am forever in your debt,

Pete Nevargic

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Amy to B.Caruso Nov.4 Post
< Date: 05-Nov-99 >

On more than one occasion and many town council meetings, we witnessed and appreciated your questioning of the town council. You did get their (reluctant) attention . Please continue to be heard at the council meetings. Your input and opinions were helpful to taxpayers. The differences in opinion among the Reps are healthy and interesting. Your contributions were solid and I hope you continue to make them.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To Mr. Nevargic
< Date: 05-Nov-99 >

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >Standing in the crowd
< Date: 06-Nov-99 >

I think it was Mr Caruso who showed them how to win. with out, Picton park and Dawn drive they had Nothing going,

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To: Standing in the crowd
< Date: 06-Nov-99 >

With a landslide too.

< Subject: RE: Clark Election - Cislo vs. Nevargic >
< From: >To standing in a crowd
< Date: 06-Nov-99 >

Everyone knew, somehow, someway, you were going to try to take the credit for Mr. Nevargic's win....nice try Bill!!!