Modern Language AssociationMonday, December 28, 1998
Session: Technology in Second-Language Learning: What does Research Tell Us?
Susana M. Sotillo, Montclair State University:
Discourse Functions and Syntactic Complexity in Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication
This study investigated the discourse functions and syntactic complexity present in learner language (interlanguage) via two different modes of computer-mediated communication (CMC): Asynchronous and synchronous. Two research questions were posed: (1) Are discourse functions present in L2 learners synchronous discussions quantitatively and qualitatively different from those available in asynchronous discussions? And (2) which mode of CMC facilitates the development of syntactic complexity? Syntactic complexity in this study is defined as the ability to produce writing in which ideas and large chunks of information are successfully compressed into fewer words by the use of subordinate and embedded subordinate clauses.
TABLE 1 Discourse Features in Synchronous Communication (Four 90-minute Sessions using mIRC; N=23 students) (Two teachers--one teacher per session) |
|||
Categories (Electronic Speech Acts) |
Total | Teacher | Students |
(1) Greetings | 53 | 7 | 46 |
(2) Topic Initiation | 18 | 12 | 6 |
(3) Assertions/Imperatives | 192 | 23 | 169 |
(4) Questions/Requests: | |||
Clarification, Confirmation, | |||
Comprehension, Explanations | 184 | 89 | 95 |
(5) Responses: Elaboration | |||
Explanation, Clarification, | |||
Apology, agreement | 556 | 74 | 482 |
(6) Adversarial Moves | 44 | --- | 44 |
(7) Off topic comments | 8 | 2 | 6 |
(8) Topic Shift Moves | 17 | 5 | 12 |
(9) Humor | 66 | 1 | 65 |
(10) Information Requests | 92 | 43 | 49 |
(11) Floor Holding Moves | 6 | 2 | 4 |
(12) Focus on Form or | |||
Corrective moves | 14 | 8 | 6 |
(13) Reprimands | 3 | 2 | 1 |
(14) Closing Moves | 12 | 5 | 7 |
Totals | 1265 | 273 | 992 |
mRIC Session #1 Excerpt
Conversation in slow motion: Electronic Speech Acts
<Luumanh> I will kick you out anyway. (Adversarial move; 6)
<Alsushka> What is your problem, darling? I am your secret admirer. (Humor; 9; 9)
<Morrigan> Luumanh, what are your thoughts on the last article? (Request for information; 10
Did you like it? and floor holding move; 11)
<Luumanh> Yeah Dr. Sotillo. It is very interesting. (Response: agreement; 5e, and elaboration,5a)
<Morrigan> What do you mean by interesting? Did you read it? (Request for clarification; 4a)
(Request for information; 10)
<Alsushka> You are computer fanatic, darling! You dont care
about anything else, even about me!!! (Humor; 9)
<Luumanh> Why do I have to care about you? You are not in my (Adversarial Move; 6;
class. assertion, 3)
<Alsushka> You are computer fanatic, darling! You dont care (Humor; 9)
about anything else, even about me!!!
<Edi> Fatima, why dont you talk? (Request for explanation; 4d)
<Lucy> Fatima, why you called yourself like that? " "
<Kae> Is that only the case of garment factories? (Clarification request, 4a)
<Edi>Fatima, I am sorry. (Response: apology, 5d)
TABLE 2 Discourse Features in Asynchronous Communication 60-minute Sessions |
||
Type of Move/Posting (Electronic speech acts) | Teacher Postings/Moves |
Student Postings/Moves |
Topic Initiation Moves | 9 |
13 |
Student Responses | 52 |
|
Teacher Responses/comments | 14 |
|
Student Comments or Responses to other Students |
17 |
|
Totals (105) | 23 |
82 |
Coding Categories Definitions:
1. Greetings: Opening move in a synchronous discussion: "People talk to me!"
2. Topic Initiation: Suggesting a topic in a synhronous discussion: "Lets talk about beach erosion."
Assertions/Imperatives: Declarative statements; commands: "This is really terrible but its the law "
Questions/Requests: Specific electronic speech acts based on Long (1981): (a) clarification requests; (b) confirmation checks; (c) comprehension checks; (d) explanation requests: "Is that only the case with garment factories?" (4a); "Why did she feel that NASA was responsible for her loss?" (4d).
Responses: (a) Elaboration; (b) explanation; (c) clarification; (d) apology; (e) agreement. Examples of elaboration and explanation, respectively: "I have been interested in classical music since I began to learn piano. I knew that music was not only for people to make happy, but also for patients who have emotional and physical handicaps," (5a) and "because her father was working in NASA," (5b).
Adversarial moves/challenges: Electronic speech acts where one participant challenges another: "Do you only read cheap magazines?"
Off Topic: Electronic speech act that deviates from the topic under discussion: "You are crazy, boyfriend! You are crazy, boyfriend!"
Topic shift moves: "I think we should now move on to your article."
Humor: "Vietnamese movie is not good. It is very cheap ."
Request for information: "Where does one find the worst beach erosion in New Jersey?"
Floor holding moves: Electronic speech acts where one participant or participants try to keep the conversation going, as in the following sequence:
<tm> Magie, I agree with you.
<tm> I guess nobody knows about the importance of plankton in the ocean.
<Inanna> Ing, music helps when one is depressed. What type of music do therapists recommend for people who are depressed?
<Ing> I believe that music is spiritual thing. Music reproduces the mood and spirit of the composer; of the moment he composed it.
<Inanna> Yes, anyone can play an instrument, sing beautifully like the sopranos and tenors, or compose music if truly gifted ."
<futsuunonko> Music is a very trace that the composer made.
Focus on Form/Corrective moves: As in the following sequence
<JCQH> Yeah! But dont you remember nice time that you spent at school with children your edge?"
.
<Cucarron> I remember those days, at that AGE. NOT EDGE!
Reprimands: "Margo, you are rude!!!"
Closing moves: "Class, for next week, I want you to read the following articles "
TABLE 3
Frequency Distribution of Syntactic Complexity Indicators by Type of Electronic Discussion
Type of Electronic Discussion | Error-free clauses | Total Clauses | Error-free T-units | Total T-units | Subordinate Clauses | Embedded Subord. Clauses | T-unit Length (Total # Words/Total T-units) |
Synchronous | 53 |
330 |
120 |
230 |
28 |
47 |
9.49 |
Asynchronous | 270 |
577 |
120 |
322 |
83 |
195 |
12.06 |
TABLE 4
Ratios of Syntactic Complexity by Type of Electronic Discussion
Type of Electronic Discussion | Error-free Clauses/Total Clauses | Error-free T-units/total clauses | Error-free T-units/total T-units | Subordinate Clauses/Total Clauses | Embedded Subordinate Clauses/Total Clauses |
T-unit
Length (Total Words/TotalT-units |
Synchronous | 0.160 |
0.363 |
0.521 |
0.084 |
0.142 |
9.49 |
Asynchronous | 0.467 |
0.207 |
0.372 |
0.144 |
0.338 |
12.06 |
ESL Threaded Discussion Forum
Ethnic and Racial Identity
by Susana, 1/24/97
Franklin (In Experiencing. . . (1993), p. 19) writes: "If the history of ethnicity has meant anything at all during the last three centuries, it has meant the gradual but steady retreat from the broad and healthy regard for cultural and racial differences to a narrow, counter-productive concept of differences in terms of whim,
intolerance, and racial prejudice. We have come full circle." Do you agree or disagree with Franklin's argument? What arguments would you offer to support or refute his analysis?
History of Ethnicity During the Last Three Centuries by Ceci 1/25/97
Changing Attitudes by Susana 1/30/97
Ways of Being by Susana 1/24/97
A Message from Hopi to Our Modern Societies by Ceci 1/24/97
Fathers and sons by Inni 1/24/97
Re : Father and Sons by Vi 1/25/97
Religion and Tradition by Susana 1/30/97
The Elephant. by Edi 1/24/97
My parents and me: Two generations by Ceci 1/24/97
different types by S. K. 1/25/97
Response to Two generations by Dr. Inni 1/25/97
Response to Two generations by Dr. Inni 1/25/97
No Taboos by Ceci 1/25/97
The beliefes by S. K. 1/24/97
Re : beliefes by Vi 1/25/97
Great Attitude! by Susana 1/30/97
Coding Procedures: T-units and Clauses as Units of Analysis
Excerpt #1--Rosa Wakefield story by Inni 2/7/97
["The real thing is that even if you are nice person, some people dont even want to talk to you, because of your race or nationality.] [This woman, Rosa Wakefield, tried to do the best [that] she could in her life.] [Everything that she did was perfect], [she helped her relatives, friends, worked hard], [everybody knows that she is the best cook and the best housekeeper.] [She says a lot about differences between black and white people.] [One thing is even that the white people think a lot about everything, they are not always successful.] [She says that if she was thinking about everything like this, shed burn her cakes and scorch skirts.] [I cant say that this is not true because there were so many situations when I was doing one thing and in the same time thinking about another and the result was, that I did wrong my job and I was depressed in my mind.] [She also says that people love her and treat her like the best friend, because she helped them a lot.] [Also she says that whites treat blacks like "the second kind of people."]
(T-units have been enclosed in brackets. Embedded subordinate clauses are shown in bold type and italicized, and subordinate clauses that show a hierarchical relationship with respect to the main clause are in bold type.)
Economics and the American Dream by Susana 4/3/97
Economics and American Dream
by Edi 4/5/97
Mack and Glennon come from different social classes. She is a member of the working family and he belongs to a higher social class. That is way, their behaviour, language, and dressing style are completly different. Mack uses the slang which is typical for his social class but it sounds strange for his partner. Glennon feels a great distance between herself and Mack and she descrides her position as a "marginal". She wants to decrease the distance between them by erasing " any trace of her lower station".
According to Ruth Sidel " the persistent poor" is a person who lives in poverty eight of the ten years. She states that group contains one-third of elderly living in rural areas. She also considers black households and female- headed hauseholds as groups of persistend poverty. The femalization of poverty is coused by social and economic factors. Women bear more responsibility for their family, and employers believe that they cannot work as effectively as men. So, they are discriminated at the work. In many cases, they are also dependent on men who make main income and suport family. When women become a head of hausehold,
they find a lot of difficulties to get a job. As a result, they become dependent on a welfare fund.
References
Beauvois, M.H. (1997). High-tech, high-touch: From discussion to composition in the networked Classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 10, 57-69.
Beauvois, M.H. (1997). Computer-mediated communication (CMC): Technology for improving speaking and writing. In Technology-Enhanced Language Learning (pp.165-183). National Textbook Company.
Bork, A. (1997). The Future of Computers and Learning. T.H.E. Journal, 24(11), 69-77.
Bruce, B., Peyton, J.K., & Batson, T. (Eds.) (1993). Network-based Classrooms: promises and Realities. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Chapelle, C. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms? Language Learning& Technology, 1, 19-43.
Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17-31.
Collins, M. (1998). Introductory summary of Computer-mediated Communication and the Online Classroom: Overview and Perspectives. http://sstar.ucc.nau.edu/~mauri/ham1.html
Gaies, S.J. (1980). T-Unit Analysis in second language research: Applications, problems and limitations. TESOL Quarterly, 14(1), 53-60.
Hunt, K. W. (1970). Syntactic maturity in school children and adults. Monographs of the Society For Research in Child Development, 53 (No.134), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and quality of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.
Lantolf, J. (1988). The Syntactic complexity of written texts in Spanish as a foreign language: A markedness perspective. Hispania 71, 933-940.
Larsen-Freeman, D. , & Strom, V. (1977). The construction of a second language acquisition index of development. Language Learning, 27(1), 123-134.
Long, M.H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language Acquisition (pp.259-278). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 379.
Mendonça, C.A.,& Johnson, K.E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 745-769.
Meunier, L.E. (1994). Computer-assisted language instruction in cooperative learning. Applied Language Learning, 5, 31-56.
Moffett, J. (1968). Teaching the universe of discourse. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Pica, T. (1987). Second language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 8, 3-21.
Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language-learning conditions, Processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
Polio, C. G. (1997). Measures of Linguistic Accuracy in Second Language Writing Research. Language Learning, 47(1), 101-143.
Salaberry, M.R. (1996). A theoretical foundation for the development of pedagogical tasks in computer mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 14, 5-34
Schleppegrell, M.J. (1992). Subordination and linguistic complexity. Discourse Processes, 15, 117-131.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible Output in its development. In S.M. Gass & C.G. Madden (Eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp.235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language Classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7-26.
Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 470-481.
Warschauer, M., Turbee, L., & Roberts, B. (1996). Computer learning networks and student Empowerment. System, 14, 1-14.